How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: every zero sequence admits a genus-zero canonical product
Statement
Every discrete zero sequence in admits a genus-zero canonical product.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sequence for .
The genus-zero elementary factor is (Weierstrass elementary factors).
The harmonic series diverges (For rational , converges iff ).
For nonnegative reals , the product converges if and only if converges (For the product converges iff converges, with when ; for the product converges iff converges and its partial products tend to otherwise; and convergent implies convergent).
Refutation
The sequence has no finite accumulation point, so it is a legitimate zero sequence.
For this sequence the genus-zero canonical product is by [F1]. Evaluating at gives the positive-factor product
The series diverges by [F2], so [F3] implies that the product in step 2.1 does not converge. Therefore the genus-zero canonical product for fails even pointwise at , and the statement is false.
Depends on
- Weierstrass elementary factors
- For rational $p > 0$, $\sum 1/k^p$ converges iff $p > 1$
- For $p_k \ge 0$ the product $\prod (1 + p_k)$ converges iff $\sum p_k$ converges, with $1 + \sum_{k<n} p_k \le \prod_{k<n}(1+p_k) \le 1/\bigl(1 - \sum_{k<n} p_k\bigr)$ when $\sum_{k<n} p_k < 1$; for $0 \le p_k < 1$ the product $\prod (1 - p_k)$ converges iff $\sum p_k$ converges and its partial products tend to $0$ otherwise; and $\sum |p_k|$ convergent implies $\prod (1+p_k)$ convergent
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Elias M. Stein and Rami Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Ch. 5 Infinite products (standard reference, not scraped)