Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-21
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: every continuous function on a compact interval has a rectifiable graph

Statement

False claim: if f:[a,b]→R is continuous on a compact interval, then its graph path x↦(x,f(x)) is rectifiable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The universal claim in the Statement.

[L1]

A function has bounded variation on [a,b] exactly when its finite partition-variation sums are bounded above (Bounded variation and total variation on an interval).

[L2]

The harmonic series ∑k≥11/k diverges (For rational p>0, ∑1/kp converges iff p>1, case p=1).

[L3]

The shift formulas give sin⁡((2k+1)π/2)=(−1)k for k∈N (Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi).

[L4]

For every real u, ∣sin⁡u∣≤1 (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine).

[L5]

A path in Rn is rectifiable if and only if each coordinate function has bounded variation (A path in Rn is rectifiable exactly when every coordinate has bounded variation).

[L6]

For every real ε>0, there is a positive integer N with 1/N<ε (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n≥1 with 1/n<ε).

[L7]

Refutation

technique · contradiction
1.1assume-contra

Suppose, for contradiction, that every continuous real function on a compact interval has a rectifiable graph.

1.2L4L9algebra

Define f(0):=0 and f(x):=xsin⁡(1/x) for 0<x≤1. By [L4], ∣f(x)∣≤x, so f is continuous at zero; [L9] gives continuity elsewhere.

1.3L3L6L8chooseconstructalgebra

Put xk:=2/((2k+1)π). By [L6] and [L8], xk↓0, so choose K with xK≤1. By [L3], f(xk)=(−1)kxk.

2.1step 1.3L1constructalgebra

For N>K, use the partition with points 0,xN,xN−1,…,xK,1, omitting a duplicate endpoint if needed. Consecutive oscillatory nodes contribute ∣f(xk)−f(xk+1)∣=xk+xk+1≥xk to its variation sum.

3.1step 2.1L1L2algebra

Since xk=2/((2k+1)π)≥1/(π(k+1)), the variation sums in step 2.1 dominate partial tails of a fixed positive multiple of the harmonic series. They are unbounded by [L2], so [L1] says f does not have bounded variation.

4.1step 1.2step 3.1L5L10

The identity coordinate is continuous by [L10], and f is continuous by step 1.2, so the same fact makes γ(x)=(x,f(x)) a path. Its second coordinate is not of bounded variation by step 3.1. The forward implication in [L5], read contrapositively, therefore shows that γ is not rectifiable.

5.1step 1.1step 1.2step 4.1L7discharge-contradiction∎

The interval [0,1] is compact by [L7] and f is continuous by step 1.2, so step 1.1 would make its graph rectifiable, contradicting step 4.1. The universal claim is false.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

80 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources