Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-21
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: every continuous function on a compact interval has a rectifiable graph

Statement

False claim: if f:[a,b]R is continuous on a compact interval, then its graph path x(x,f(x)) is rectifiable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The universal claim in the Statement.

[L1]

A function has bounded variation on [a,b] exactly when its finite partition-variation sums are bounded above (Bounded variation and total variation on an interval).

[L2]

The harmonic series k11/k diverges (For rational p>0, 1/kp converges iff p>1, case p=1).

[L3]

The shift formulas give sin((2k+1)π/2)=(1)k for kN (Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi).

[L4]

For every real u, sinu1 (Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine).

[L5]

A path in Rn is rectifiable if and only if each coordinate function has bounded variation (A path in Rn is rectifiable exactly when every coordinate has bounded variation).

[L6]

For every real ε>0, there is a positive integer N with 1/N<ε (For every ε>0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n1 with 1/n<ε).

[L7]

Refutation

technique · contradiction
1.1

Suppose, for contradiction, that every continuous real function on a compact interval has a rectifiable graph.

assume-contra
1.2

Define f(0):=0 and f(x):=xsin(1/x) for 0<x1. By [L4], f(x)x, so f is continuous at zero; [L9] gives continuity elsewhere.

L4L9algebra
1.3

Put xk:=2/((2k+1)π). By [L6] and [L8], xk0, so choose K with xK1. By [L3], f(xk)=(1)kxk.

L3L6L8chooseconstructalgebra
2.1

For N>K, use the partition with points 0,xN,xN1,,xK,1, omitting a duplicate endpoint if needed. Consecutive oscillatory nodes contribute f(xk)f(xk+1)=xk+xk+1xk to its variation sum.

step 1.3L1constructalgebra
3.1

Since xk=2/((2k+1)π)1/(π(k+1)), the variation sums in step 2.1 dominate partial tails of a fixed positive multiple of the harmonic series. They are unbounded by [L2], so [L1] says f does not have bounded variation.

step 2.1L1L2algebra
4.1

The identity coordinate is continuous by [L10], and f is continuous by step 1.2, so the same fact makes γ(x)=(x,f(x)) a path. Its second coordinate is not of bounded variation by step 3.1. The forward implication in [L5], read contrapositively, therefore shows that γ is not rectifiable.

step 1.2step 3.1L5L10
5.1

The interval [0,1] is compact by [L7] and f is continuous by step 1.2, so step 1.1 would make its graph rectifiable, contradicting step 4.1. The universal claim is false.

step 1.1step 1.2step 4.1L7discharge-contradiction

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

80 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources