How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded variation and total variation on an interval
Definition
Let and let (Intervals of : the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length). If and is a partition of (Partition of as a finite strictly increasing list , its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions), the variation of over is
The sum is finite (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products) and nonnegative (Absolute value in an ordered field). The set of all such sums is nonempty, since has the partition with point set . The function has bounded variation on when this set of sums is bounded above (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set). In that case its total variation is
Completeness of gives this supremum and Suprema and infima are unique makes it unique (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)). On a singleton interval, by convention, ; no partition from Partition of as a finite strictly increasing list , its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions, whose standing hypothesis is , is invoked.
Depends on
- Partition of $[a,b]$ as a finite strictly increasing list $a = t_0 < t_1 < \dots < t_n = b$, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions
- Finite sums and finite products, by recursion
- Laws of finite sums and finite products
- Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set
- Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)
- Suprema and infima are unique
- Intervals of $\mathbb{R}$: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
- Absolute value in an ordered field
Used by
- A bounded-variation integrand is Riemann–Stieltjes integrable against every continuous integrator Corollary
- The total-variation bound for a Riemann–Stieltjes integral Corollary
- A common jump can destroy Riemann–Stieltjes integrability Counterexample
- A continuous function on [0,1] can have unbounded variation Counterexample
- Variation function and positive and negative variations Definition
- The Cantor function is continuous and of bounded variation but not absolutely continuous Example
- Young's theorem integrates a Hölder function of unbounded variation against itself Example
- Every bounded-variation function is uniformly approximable by step functions Lemma
- Homogeneity and subadditivity of total variation Lemma
- Refinement and tag-change estimates for Stieltjes sums Lemma
- Total variation bounds increments; bounded-variation functions are bounded; zero variation means constant Lemma
- Total variation is additive over adjacent subintervals and decreases under restriction Lemma
- Conventions and proved scope for bounded variation and Stieltjes integration Remark
- A bounded function with finitely many discontinuities is Stieltjes integrable against a continuous bounded-variation integrator Theorem
- A continuous integrand is Riemann–Stieltjes integrable against every bounded-variation integrator Theorem
- A countable pure-step integrator evaluates a continuous integrand as the absolutely convergent weighted sum of its values at the jumps Theorem
- C¹ implies Lipschitz, Lipschitz implies absolutely continuous, and absolutely continuous implies continuous and bounded variation Theorem
- Functions of bounded variation form an algebra Theorem
- Jordan decomposition for functions of bounded variation Theorem
- Linearity and interval additivity of the Riemann–Stieltjes integral Theorem
- Two bounded-variation functions with no common discontinuity are Riemann–Stieltjes integrable Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 45 results over 10 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William F. Trench, Introduction to Real Analysis, Ch. 3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Christopher Heil, Absolute Continuity and the Banach-Zaretsky Theorem (standard reference, not scraped)