Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Total variation bounds increments; bounded-variation functions are bounded; zero variation means constant

Statement

Let f:[a,b]→R have bounded variation. Then

  1. ∣f(y)−f(x)∣≤Var⁡[a,b](f) for all x,y∈[a,b];
  2. f is bounded on [a,b];
  3. Var⁡[a,b](f)=0 if and only if f is constant.

These claims include the singleton interval a=b.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Reals a≤b and a bounded-variation function f:[a,b]→R.

[L1]

Total variation is the supremum of the partition sums V(f,P), with value 0 on a singleton interval (Bounded variation and total variation on an interval).

[L3]

Finite sums of nonnegative terms dominate every term (Laws of finite sums and finite products).

[L4]

∣u+v∣≤∣u∣+∣v∣ in an ordered field (The triangle inequality).

[L5]

A subset of R is bounded when the absolute values of its members have a common real bound (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If a<b and x<y lie in [a,b], insert x and y into the endpoint partition. The resulting partition sum contains ∣f(y)−f(x)∣ as a nonnegative term, so ∣f(y)−f(x)∣≤V(f,P)≤Var⁡[a,b](f). The same inequality is 0≤Var⁡[a,b](f) when x=y, and when a=b only that case occurs.

L1L2L3
2.1

Put M:=∣f(a)∣+Var⁡[a,b](f). For x∈[a,b], ∣f(x)∣≤∣f(x)−f(a)∣+∣f(a)∣≤M, so f([a,b]) is bounded.

step 1.1L4L5
3.1

If the total variation is 0, step 1.1 gives ∣f(y)−f(x)∣=0 for every x,y, hence f is constant. Conversely, if f is constant then every increment in every partition sum is 0, so every sum and its supremum are 0; the singleton convention gives the same conclusion when a=b.

step 1.1L1L3∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources