How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A bounded function with finitely many discontinuities is Stieltjes integrable against a continuous bounded-variation integrator
Statement
Let be bounded and have only finitely many discontinuities. If is continuous and has bounded variation, then exists.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A bounded with finite discontinuity set , and a continuous BV integrator on .
A BV function is the difference of two nondecreasing functions (Jordan decomposition for functions of bounded variation).
The canonical monotone summands of a continuous BV function are continuous (The jumps of a variation function equal the absolute jumps of the original function).
For , a bounded integrand and a nondecreasing integrator, mesh integrability is equivalent to continuity of the integrand at every discontinuity of the integrator together with the weighted oscillation criterion (Darboux criterion for Riemann–Stieltjes integrability with a nondecreasing integrator).
Continuous functions on compact intervals are uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor in : a continuous real function on a compact subset of is uniformly continuous, proved -natively from sequential compactness).
Stieltjes integration is linear in the integrator (Linearity and interval additivity of the Riemann–Stieltjes integral).
Continuity makes the increment of arbitrarily small on sufficiently short intervals around each point (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).
Proof
If the integral is by the definition of the Riemann-Stieltjes integral on a singleton interval and there is nothing to prove, so assume , which is the standing hypothesis of [L3].
First suppose that is continuous and nondecreasing. Write . Given , [L6] and finiteness of allow pairwise disjoint closed intervals about the points whose total -increment is less than .
On the compact complement of the interiors of the , the function is continuous and hence uniformly continuous by [L4]. Choose a partition containing all endpoints of the and fine enough that every remaining partition interval has oscillation below . The intervals meeting contribute at most times their total -increment, and all other intervals contribute less than . After rescaling the two preliminary bounds, the weighted oscillation sum is arbitrarily small, so [L3] gives .
For a general continuous BV , [L1] writes . Both and are continuous by [L2]. Step 2.1 gives integrability against each, and linearity in the integrator [L5] gives integrability against .
Depends on
- Darboux criterion for Riemann–Stieltjes integrability with a nondecreasing integrator
- Jordan decomposition for functions of bounded variation
- The jumps of a variation function equal the absolute jumps of the original function
- Linearity and interval additivity of the Riemann–Stieltjes integral
- Bounded variation and total variation on an interval
- Continuity of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a point of $A$ and on $A$: the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ condition, its agreement with $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c)$ at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
- Heine-Cantor in $\mathbb{R}$: a continuous real function on a compact subset of $\mathbb{R}$ is uniformly continuous, proved $\mathbb{R}$-natively from sequential compactness
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 144 results over 20 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, Ch. 6, Theorem 6.10 (standard reference, not scraped)