Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A bounded function with finitely many discontinuities is Stieltjes integrable against a continuous bounded-variation integrator

Statement

Let f:[a,b]→R be bounded and have only finitely many discontinuities. If α:[a,b]→R is continuous and has bounded variation, then ∫abf dα exists.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded f with finite discontinuity set D, and a continuous BV integrator α on [a,b].

[L1]

A BV function is the difference of two nondecreasing functions (Jordan decomposition for functions of bounded variation).

[L2]

The canonical monotone summands of a continuous BV function are continuous (The jumps of a variation function equal the absolute jumps of the original function).

[L3]

For a<b, a bounded integrand and a nondecreasing integrator, mesh integrability is equivalent to continuity of the integrand at every discontinuity of the integrator together with the weighted oscillation criterion (Darboux criterion for Riemann–Stieltjes integrability with a nondecreasing integrator).

[L5]

Stieltjes integration is linear in the integrator (Linearity and interval additivity of the Riemann–Stieltjes integral).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If a=b the integral is 0 by the definition of the Riemann-Stieltjes integral on a singleton interval and there is nothing to prove, so assume a<b, which is the standing hypothesis of [L3].

givenL3
1.2

First suppose that α is continuous and nondecreasing. Write ∣f∣≤M. Given ε>0, [L6] and finiteness of D allow pairwise disjoint closed intervals Ix about the points x∈D whose total α-increment is less than ε/(4M+1).

L6
2.1

On the compact complement of the interiors of the Ix, the function f is continuous and hence uniformly continuous by [L4]. Choose a partition containing all endpoints of the Ix and fine enough that every remaining partition interval has oscillation below ε/(1+α(b)−α(a)). The intervals meeting D contribute at most 2M times their total α-increment, and all other intervals contribute less than ε. After rescaling the two preliminary bounds, the weighted oscillation sum is arbitrarily small, so [L3] gives f∈R(α).

step 1.2L3L4
3.1

For a general continuous BV α, [L1] writes α=α(a)+Pα−Nα. Both Pα and Nα are continuous by [L2]. Step 2.1 gives integrability against each, and linearity in the integrator [L5] gives integrability against α.

step 2.1L1L2L5∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

54 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources