Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Jordan decomposition for functions of bounded variation

Statement

A real function ff on [a,b][a,b] has bounded variation if and only if it is a difference of two nondecreasing functions. If f(a)=0f(a)=0, the canonical normalized decomposition is f=PfNff=P_f-N_f. More generally f=f(a)+PfNff=f(a)+P_f-N_f.

It is minimal: if f=f(a)+ghf=f(a)+g-h with nondecreasing g,hg,h and g(a)=h(a)=0g(a)=h(a)=0, then Pf(x)g(x)P_f(x)\le g(x) and Nf(x)h(x)N_f(x)\le h(x) for every xx.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A function f:[a,b]Rf:[a,b]\to\mathbb R.

[L1]

For BV ff, Pf,NfP_f,N_f are nondecreasing, normalized at aa, and f=f(a)+PfNff=f(a)+P_f-N_f (The positive and negative variations are nondecreasing and give the Jordan identities).

[L2]

Total variation is the supremum of sums of absolute increments (Bounded variation and total variation on an interval).

[L5]

Finite sums telescope and distribute over addition (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).

[L6]

uvu+v|u-v|\le |u|+|v| (The triangle inequality).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If ff is BV, [L1] immediately supplies the stated difference of nondecreasing functions, with the asserted normalization.

L1
1.2

Conversely suppose f=f(a)+ghf=f(a)+g-h with g,hg,h nondecreasing. For a partition P=(n,t)P=(n,t), every forward increment of gg and hh is nonnegative, so f(ti+1)f(ti)(g(ti+1)g(ti))+(h(ti+1)h(ti))|f(t_{i+1})-f(t_i)|\le(g(t_{i+1})-g(t_i))+(h(t_{i+1})-h(t_i)). Summing and telescoping gives V(f,P)g(b)g(a)+h(b)h(a)V(f,P)\le g(b)-g(a)+h(b)-h(a), independent of PP; hence ff is BV.

L2L3L4L5L6
2.1

Now assume the decomposition is normalized. On [a,x][a,x], step 1.2 gives Vf(x)g(x)+h(x)V_f(x)\le g(x)+h(x), while f(x)f(a)=g(x)h(x)f(x)-f(a)=g(x)-h(x). Adding these inequalities and dividing by 22 yields Pf(x)g(x)P_f(x)\le g(x); subtracting the increment identity from the variation inequality yields Nf(x)h(x)N_f(x)\le h(x).

step 1.2L1L2algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 56 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources