Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two bounded-variation functions with no common discontinuity are Riemann–Stieltjes integrable

Statement

Let f,α:[a,b]→R have bounded variation. If no point is a discontinuity of both functions, then ∫abf dα exists.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: BV functions f and α with disjoint discontinuity sets.

[L2]

A BV function can be approximated uniformly by step functions whose breakpoints avoid a prescribed countable set of its continuity points (Every bounded-variation function is uniformly approximable by step functions).

[L3]

Direct subtraction of two Stieltjes sums and the finite-sum triangle inequality give ∣Sα(f)−Sα(g)∣≤∥f−g∥∞Var⁡(α) (Riemann–Stieltjes sums, upper and lower sums, and the Riemann–Stieltjes integral, Bounded variation and total variation on an interval, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products, The triangle inequality).

[L5]

If α is continuous at a point, its variation function is continuous there; refinement errors are bounded by local variation times local oscillation (The jumps of a variation function equal the absolute jumps of the original function, Refinement and tag-change estimates for Stieltjes sums).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By the no-common-discontinuity hypothesis, f is continuous at every point of Dα. For each n≥1, [L1] and [L2] provide a finite step function sn with ∥f−sn∥∞<1/n and all interior breakpoints outside Dα. If an endpoint belongs to Dα, continuity of f there permits the value on the adjacent open component to be changed to f at that endpoint while retaining the same bound after beginning with tolerance 1/(2n). Thus sn is continuous at every point of Dα.

L1L2
2.1

Each sn is integrable with respect to α. Its finitely many discontinuities are points where α is continuous by step 1.1. By [L5], choose disjoint neighborhoods of those points whose total local variation is small. Outside them sn is locally constant, while inside them [L5] bounds differences between fine sums by the small local variation times the finite oscillation of sn. Hence the fine sums are Cauchy. Choose a sequence of uniform tagged sums with mesh tending to zero; [L4] gives its limit, and comparison with a sufficiently late member of this sequence shows that every sufficiently fine tagged sum has the same limit.

step 1.1L4L5
3.1

Given ε>0, choose n so that 2Var⁡[a,b](α)/n<ε/2 (the zero-variation case is immediate), and then choose a mesh bound making any two sums of sn differ by less than ε/2. By [L3], replacing sn by f in either sum changes it by at most Var⁡(α)/n. Hence all sufficiently fine sums of f are Cauchy. Choose uniform tagged sums with mesh tending to zero; their sums form a Cauchy sequence and converge by [L4]. Comparing an arbitrary sufficiently fine sum with a late uniform sum proves convergence of the whole mesh family to that sequential limit, which is exactly the defining Stieltjes integral.

step 2.1L3L4∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources