How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Riemann–Stieltjes sums, upper and lower sums, and the Riemann–Stieltjes integral
Definition
Let , let , and let be a partition (Partition of as a finite strictly increasing list , its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions). A choice of tags for makes a tagged partition as in Tagged partitions of , with a tag in each subinterval, and the Riemann sum . Its Riemann-Stieltjes sum is
The function is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to on if there is such that for every there is for which every tagged partition with satisfies . Then .
If is bounded (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set) and is nondecreasing (Nondecreasing, increasing (strictly increasing), nonincreasing, decreasing, monotone and strictly monotone real functions on a subset of , with the dictionary to monotone sequences), put
where . These are the lower and upper Stieltjes sums. Each subinterval is nonempty and its image under bounded is bounded above and below, so the suprema exist by Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property) and the infima by Greatest lower bound (infimum) and Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum. Finite sums use Finite sums and finite products, by recursion and Laws of finite sums and finite products. On the integral is ; for set , matching The integral with oriented limits: and .
Depends on
- Partition of $[a,b]$ as a finite strictly increasing list $a = t_0 < t_1 < \dots < t_n = b$, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions
- Tagged partitions of $[a,b]$, with a tag $\xi_i$ in each subinterval, and the Riemann sum $S(f,P,\xi) = \sum_i f(\xi_i)\,\Delta_i$
- Finite sums and finite products, by recursion
- Laws of finite sums and finite products
- Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set
- Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)
- Greatest lower bound (infimum)
- Every nonempty set bounded below has an infimum
- Nondecreasing, increasing (strictly increasing), nonincreasing, decreasing, monotone and strictly monotone real functions on a subset of $\mathbb{R}$, with the dictionary to monotone sequences
- Intervals of $\mathbb{R}$: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length
- The integral with oriented limits: $\int_a^a f := 0$ and $\int_b^a f := -\int_a^b f$
Used by
- The identity integrator recovers the Riemann integral Corollary
- The total-variation bound for a Riemann–Stieltjes integral Corollary
- A common jump can destroy Riemann–Stieltjes integrability Counterexample
- Nyström quadrature operators and their reconstructed equations Definition
- The absolute line integral over a rectifiable path using its arc-length function Definition
- The complex line integral over a rectifiable path as a componentwise Riemann–Stieltjes integral Definition
- A finite-step integrator gives a weighted sum over its jumps Example
- A one-jump integrator evaluates a continuous integrand at the jump Example
- A Riemann–Stieltjes integrable integrand need not be bounded Example
- The Cantor function defines a nonclassical Stieltjes integrator and ∫₀¹ 1 dc=1 Example
- A continuous kernel defines a compact integral operator on C of an interval Lemma
- Refinement and tag-change estimates for Stieltjes sums Lemma
- The half-order diagonal singularity defines a bounded improper integral Lemma
- The Riemann–Stieltjes integral is unique Lemma
- Translations of the half-order kernel are continuous in the improper L1 norm Lemma
- Conventions and proved scope for bounded variation and Stieltjes integration Remark
- A continuous function of a Stieltjes-integrable function is Stieltjes integrable for a nondecreasing integrator Theorem
- A continuous integrand is Riemann–Stieltjes integrable against every bounded-variation integrator Theorem
- A continuously differentiable integrator reduces Stieltjes integration to ordinary integration Theorem
- A countable pure-step integrator evaluates a continuous integrand as the absolutely convergent weighted sum of its values at the jumps Theorem
- Change of variable for the Riemann–Stieltjes integral Theorem
- Darboux criterion for Riemann–Stieltjes integrability with a nondecreasing integrator Theorem
- For a continuous integrand, the Riemann-Stieltjes and Lebesgue-Stieltjes integrals agree Theorem
- Linearity and interval additivity of the Riemann–Stieltjes integral Theorem
- Riemann–Stieltjes integration by parts Theorem
- Two bounded-variation functions with no common discontinuity are Riemann–Stieltjes integrable Theorem
- Young's Riemann–Stieltjes existence theorem for rational Hölder exponents Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- William F. Trench, Introduction to Real Analysis, Definition 3.1.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, Ch. 6 (standard reference, not scraped)