How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A one-jump integrator evaluates a continuous integrand at the jump
Example
Fix and let for and for . For every continuous ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-jump integrator and a continuous .
A Stieltjes sum weights each tag by the corresponding integrator increment (Riemann–Stieltjes sums, upper and lower sums, and the Riemann–Stieltjes integral).
Verification
In every tagged partition, all increments of vanish except the one on the interval across its jump; that increment is one. Its tag satisfies , so the complete Stieltjes sum is and tends to by [L2].
The same computation counts a jump at . A jump at is represented by and for and likewise contributes . By contrast, merely assigning a constant endpoint value on the whole interval creates no increment and hence has integral zero.
Depends on
- Riemann–Stieltjes sums, upper and lower sums, and the Riemann–Stieltjes integral
- A continuous integrand is Riemann–Stieltjes integrable against every bounded-variation integrator
- Continuity of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a point of $A$ and on $A$: the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ condition, its agreement with $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c)$ at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
- Partition of $[a,b]$ as a finite strictly increasing list $a = t_0 < t_1 < \dots < t_n = b$, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 77 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, Ch. 6, Theorem 6.15 (standard reference, not scraped)