How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A continuous integrand is Riemann–Stieltjes integrable against every bounded-variation integrator
Statement
If is continuous and has bounded variation, then exists.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A continuous and a BV function .
The refinement estimate bounds differences of tagged sums by oscillation times total variation (Refinement and tag-change estimates for Stieltjes sums).
A Stieltjes mesh limit, when it exists, is unique (The Riemann–Stieltjes integral is unique, Riemann–Stieltjes sums, upper and lower sums, and the Riemann–Stieltjes integral).
Total variation is finite for a BV function (Bounded variation and total variation on an interval).
A continuous real function on a compact interval is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor in : a continuous real function on a compact subset of is uniformly continuous, proved -natively from sequential compactness, Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).
Uniform partitions of arbitrarily small mesh exist, and common refinements exist (Partition of as a finite strictly increasing list , its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions).
Proof
Put . If , every integrator increment is , so every Stieltjes sum is and the integral exists. Assume . Given , uniform continuity gives such that implies . Any two tagged partitions of mesh below have all local oscillations below ; comparing both with their common refinement through [L1] makes their sums differ by less than .
Choose one tagged uniform partition with mesh tending to for each natural index and call its sum . Step 1.1 makes Cauchy, so [L5] gives a real limit .
Given , choose the threshold in step 1.1 for error and then a uniform sum beyond that threshold with . Every arbitrary tagged sum with sufficiently small mesh differs from by less than , hence is within of . This is the mesh-limit definition, and [L2] identifies the unique value.
Depends on
- Refinement and tag-change estimates for Stieltjes sums
- The Riemann–Stieltjes integral is unique
- Riemann–Stieltjes sums, upper and lower sums, and the Riemann–Stieltjes integral
- Bounded variation and total variation on an interval
- Heine-Cantor in $\mathbb{R}$: a continuous real function on a compact subset of $\mathbb{R}$ is uniformly continuous, proved $\mathbb{R}$-natively from sequential compactness
- Continuity of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a point of $A$ and on $A$: the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ condition, its agreement with $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c)$ at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
- The Cauchy criterion from the least-upper-bound property: in a complete ordered field every Cauchy sequence converges
- Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals
- Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences
- Partition of $[a,b]$ as a finite strictly increasing list $a = t_0 < t_1 < \dots < t_n = b$, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions
Used by
- A bounded-variation integrand is Riemann–Stieltjes integrable against every continuous integrator Corollary
- A one-jump integrator evaluates a continuous integrand at the jump Example
- The Cantor function defines a nonclassical Stieltjes integrator and ∫₀¹ 1 dc=1 Example
- A countable pure-step integrator evaluates a continuous integrand as the absolutely convergent weighted sum of its values at the jumps Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 121 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, Ch. 6, Theorem 6.8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- William F. Trench, Introduction to Real Analysis, Exercise 3.2.9 (standard reference, not scraped)