LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Refinement and tag-change estimates for Stieltjes sums

Statement

Let $\alpha$ have bounded variation on $[a,b]$ , let $P=(n,t)$ be a partition, and let $Q$ refine $P$ . If the oscillation of $f$ on $[t_i,t_{i+1}]$ is at most $\omega_i$ , then any tagged sum on $P$ and any tagged sum on $Q$ satisfy

$|S_Q-S_P|\le\sum_{i<n}\omega_i\operatorname{Var}_{[t_i,t_{i+1}]}(\alpha).$

In particular, if every $\omega_i\le\omega$ , the bound is $\omega\operatorname{Var}_{[a,b]}(\alpha)$ . Two tagged sums on arbitrary partitions whose intervals all have oscillation at most $\omega$ differ by at most $2\omega\operatorname{Var}_{[a,b]}(\alpha)$ .

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Functions $f,\alpha:[a,b]\to\mathbb R$ , a partition $P$ , a refinement $Q$ , and tags on both.

[L1]

Stieltjes sums are weighted finite sums of integrator increments (Riemann–Stieltjes sums, upper and lower sums, and the Riemann–Stieltjes integral).

[L2]

Total variation bounds every sum of absolute increments and is additive on adjacent subintervals (Bounded variation and total variation on an interval, Total variation is additive over adjacent subintervals and decreases under restriction).

[L3]

A refinement groups its subintervals inside the coarse ones, and any two partitions have a common refinement (Partition of $[a,b]$ as a finite strictly increasing list $a = t_0 < t_1 < \dots < t_n = b$ , its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions).

[L4]

Finite sums group and telescope (Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, Laws of finite sums and finite products).

[L5]

The absolute value of a finite sum is at most the sum of absolute values (The triangle inequality).

Proof

technique · direct

1.1

Inside one coarse interval $[t_i,t_{i+1}]$ , the refined integrator increments telescope to $\alpha(t_{i+1})-\alpha(t_i)$ . Subtract the coarse term by assigning its tag value to every refined increment. Each coefficient difference has absolute value at most $\omega_i$ , so the absolute difference contributed by that block is at most $\omega_i$ times the sum of the absolute refined increments, hence at most $\omega_i\operatorname{Var}_{[t_i,t_{i+1}]}(\alpha)$ .

L1L2L3L4L5

2.1

Summing step 1.1 over the coarse blocks proves the first estimate. If $\omega_i\le\omega$ , additivity of variation gives the uniform bound. The conclusions remain $0$ when the variation or the interval is $0$ .

step 1.1L2L4L5

3.1

For two arbitrary partitions, pass to their common refinement and apply the uniform estimate once from each original sum to the refined sum. The triangle inequality gives the factor $2$ .

step 2.1L3L5∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 58 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources

William F. Trench, Introduction to Real Analysis, Ch. 3 (standard reference, not scraped)
W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, Ch. 6 (standard reference, not scraped)