How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bounded-variation Riemann-Stieltjes theory does not construct the Brownian Ito integral
Statement refuted
The inference "the pathwise Riemann--Stieltjes construction for a bounded-variation integrator defines the Brownian Ito integral " is false. Almost surely, Brownian paths have infinite total variation on every nondegenerate compact interval, so the hypothesis of the Riemann--Stieltjes existence theorem for every continuous integrand fails; and for the explicit integrand , , the Riemann--Stieltjes sums along dyadic partitions do not converge to a common limit, because the left-endpoint rule gives while the right-endpoint rule gives . The counterexample refutes only the bounded-variation construction; it does not assert that no pathwise integral of any other kind exists, and it does not claim that the Ito integral fails to exist.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a standard Brownian motion Brownian motion, , the dyadic partitions of , and the integrand .
Almost surely, on every nondegenerate compact interval the variation sums of the Brownian path are unbounded, so the path is not of bounded variation there. Brownian paths have infinite total variation Bounded variation and total variation on an interval
If the integrator has bounded variation on and the integrand is continuous there, then the Riemann--Stieltjes sums converge along partitions of mesh tending to , independently of the evaluation points, to the Riemann--Stieltjes integral . A continuous integrand is Riemann–Stieltjes integrable against every bounded-variation integrator Partition of as a finite strictly increasing list , its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions
Along the dyadic partitions of , uniformly almost surely, and the two telescoping identities and hold with . Uniform dyadic Brownian quadratic variation process Quadratic variation along a partition sequence
AC is declared for the ambient interfaces. The Axiom of Choice
Counterexample
By [F1] there is an event of probability one on which the Brownian path is of unbounded variation on every nondegenerate compact interval; on that event the hypothesis " has bounded variation" of [F2] fails for and every interval with , so the Riemann--Stieltjes existence theorem for a general continuous integrand is not available pathwise.
For the specific integrand and the dyadic partitions, the two evaluation rules give the sums and , whose telescoping identities [F3] express them as and .
By the quadratic-variation limit of [F3], and almost surely; the two limits differ by , so the Riemann--Stieltjes sums of with have no common limit along dyadic partitions and the pathwise Riemann--Stieltjes integral does not exist in that sense, even though the Ito integral does.
Consequently the bounded-variation construction cannot serve as the definition of the Brownian Ito integral: its central hypothesis fails almost surely on every nondegenerate interval [F1], and its conclusion fails explicitly for the witness , by the limit mismatch of step 2.1. The Ito integral of the same integrand exists and equals by the companion example page, so the failure is a failure of the pathwise construction, not of the stochastic integral. AC enters only through [F4].
Source notes
Lawler, Section 2.8, records that Brownian paths have infinite variation on every interval and that the ordinary bounded-variation theory therefore does not apply; van der Vaart, Section 5.1, states the same boundary at the start of the stochastic-integration construction. The left/right limit mismatch is the standard quadratic-variation computation, included so that the failure is witnessed by an explicit pair of evaluation rules rather than only by the failure of a hypothesis.
Depends on
- Brownian paths have infinite total variation
- Bounded variation and total variation on an interval
- Partition of $[a,b]$ as a finite strictly increasing list $a = t_0 < t_1 < \dots < t_n = b$, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions
- A continuous integrand is Riemann–Stieltjes integrable against every bounded-variation integrator
- Uniform dyadic Brownian quadratic variation process
- Quadratic variation along a partition sequence
- Brownian motion
- The Axiom of Choice
- AC supplies countable selections and prescribed serial paths
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gregory F. Lawler, Stochastic Calculus: An Introduction with Applications, Section 2.8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Aad van der Vaart, Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations, Section 5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)