Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For a continuous integrand, the Riemann-Stieltjes and Lebesgue-Stieltjes integrals agree

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let a<b, let g:[a,b]→R be continuous, let F:R→R be nondecreasing and right-continuous, and let μF be the Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure attached to F. Then g is μF-integrable on (a,b] and ∫abg dF=∫(a,b]g dμF.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, reals a<b, a continuous function g:[a,b]→R, a nondecreasing right-continuous function F:R→R, its Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure μF, the Riemann-Stieltjes integral I:=∫abg dF, and a real B>0 with ∣g(x)∣≤B on [a,b].

[L1]

A continuous integrand is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable against every bounded-variation integrator; since a nondecreasing function has bounded variation, I exists. (A continuous integrand is Riemann–Stieltjes integrable against every bounded-variation integrator)

[L2]

For a nondecreasing integrator, Riemann-Stieltjes integrability is equivalent to the Darboux criterion; because g is continuous, for every ε>0 there is a partition P with UF(g,P)−LF(g,P)<ε. (Darboux criterion for Riemann–Stieltjes integrability with a nondecreasing integrator)

[L3]

For every u<v, μF((u,v])=F(v)−F(u). (Interval formulas and atoms for a Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure)

[L4]

The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions, and the simple integral of ∑jcjχEj is ∑jcjμ(Ej). (The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions, The integral of a nonnegative simple function)

[L5]

Continuous functions on R are Borel measurable. (Continuous functions on Euclidean spaces are Borel measurable)

[L6]

A measurable real function is integrable exactly when the integral of its absolute value is finite, and the Lebesgue integral is linear on L1. (Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals, The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ))

[L8]

Riemann-Stieltjes sums are S(g,F;P,ξ)=∑i=1mg(ξi)(F(ti)−F(ti−1)), and ∫abg dF=J means that every tagged partition of sufficiently small mesh has sum within any prescribed ε>0 of J. (Riemann–Stieltjes sums, upper and lower sums, and the Riemann–Stieltjes integral)

[L9]

The Riemann-Stieltjes integral is linear in the integrand. (Linearity and interval additivity of the Riemann–Stieltjes integral)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L3L4L5L6L8L9construct

Extend g to a continuous function g~:R→R by setting g~(x)=g(a) for x<a, g~(x)=g(x) for x∈[a,b], and g~(x)=g(b) for x>b. Then [L5] makes g~ Borel measurable. Put h:=(B+g~)χ(a,b]. This is a nonnegative measurable function. Since 0≤h≤2B χ(a,b], [L3], [L4], [L6], and [L7] show that h is μF-integrable. Let J:=∫ab(B+g) dF. By [L1], the integral J exists. The constant integrand B has the same Riemann-Stieltjes sum B(F(b)−F(a)) for every tagged partition, so [L8] gives ∫abB dF=B(F(b)−F(a)). Therefore [L9] yields J=I+B(F(b)−F(a)).

1.2L2L3L4L8chooseconstruct

Let ε>0. By [L2], choose a partition P0={a=t0<⋯<tm=b} with UF(g,P0)−LF(g,P0)<ε. By [L8], choose δ>0 such that every tagged partition of mesh below δ has Riemann-Stieltjes sum for B+g within ε of J. Let P={a=s0<⋯<sn=b} be a refinement of P0 with mesh below δ. For each i put mi:=inf⁡[si−1,si]g,Mi:=sup⁡[si−1,si]g, and define nonnegative simple functions on R by ℓP:=∑i=1n(B+mi)χ(si−1,si],uP:=∑i=1n(B+Mi)χ(si−1,si]. Then ℓP≤h≤uP. Because each refined infimum is at least the corresponding coarse infimum and each refined supremum is at most the corresponding coarse supremum, the Stieltjes lower sum increases and the upper sum decreases under this refinement, so UF(g,P)−LF(g,P)≤UF(g,P0)−LF(g,P0)<ε. Also [L3] and [L4] give ∫ℓP dμF=B(F(b)−F(a))+LF(g,P),∫uP dμF=B(F(b)−F(a))+UF(g,P).

2.1step 1.2L7L8algebra

Fix any tagging ξ of P. Then ∫ℓP dμF≤∫h dμF≤∫uP dμF, and because mi≤g(ξi)≤Mi on every subinterval, ∫ℓP dμF≤S(B+g,F;P,ξ)≤∫uP dμF. Hence both ∫h dμF and S(B+g,F;P,ξ) lie in an interval of length UF(g,P)−LF(g,P)<ε, so ∣∫h dμF−S(B+g,F;P,ξ)∣<ε.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1L8

Because ∥P∥<δ, [L8] gives ∣S(B+g,F;P,ξ)−J∣<ε. Combining this with step 2.1, ∣∫h dμF−J∣<2ε. Since ε>0 was arbitrary, ∫h dμF=J=I+B(F(b)−F(a)).

4.1step 1.1step 3.1L3L6∎

Step 1.1 gives h=g~ χ(a,b]+Bχ(a,b], and both summands are integrable by step 1.1. Therefore [L3] and [L6] yield ∫(a,b]g dμF=∫h dμF−BμF((a,b])=(I+B(F(b)−F(a)))−B(F(b)−F(a))=I. This is exactly ∫(a,b]g dμF=∫abg dF, so the two integrals agree.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources