Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conventions and proved scope for bounded variation and Stieltjes integration

Statement

Total variation is zero on a singleton, and both ordinary and Riemann–Stieltjes integrals use the oriented convention when endpoints are reversed. Absolute continuity here is formulated with finite disjoint families of intervals.

On a nondegenerate interval [a,b][a,b] with a<ba<b, and for a nondecreasing integrator, the weighted Darboux condition matches the all-fine-mesh definition only together with continuity of the integrand at the integrator's discontinuities; this extra compatibility is vacuous for a continuous integrator. The hypothesis a<ba<b is part of the statement and not cosmetic: on [a,a][a,a] the integral is 00 by convention, so every bounded integrand is integrable there, while a singleton interval admits no partition at all and so the Darboux condition fails; a consumer needing a=ba=b reads the value off the definition instead. A general BV integrator is handled through Jordan decomposition or tagged sums. Finite-step integrators turn the integral of a continuous integrand into a weighted evaluation sum over the jumps, while continuously differentiable integrators reduce the integral of a Riemann-integrable integrand to an ordinary integral against the derivative. The no-common-discontinuity theorem is sharp in view of the companion common-jump counterexample. Young's theorem is proved here only for rational Hölder exponents because arbitrary real exponents are not available at this point in the reading order; the later Real powers for positive bases, with the zero-base positive-exponent convention is what supplies them. No Lebesgue–Stieltjes measure, almost-everywhere differentiability theorem, or arbitrary-real-exponent Stieltjes theorem is asserted on this page.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 103 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources