How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice
Statement
Let be topological spaces and let carry the product topology, with projections (The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space). Then:
- The projections are continuous, and the product topology is the coarsest topology on making all of them continuous.
- Characteristic property. For every space and every function , The functions are the components of , and every family of functions arises from exactly one , namely .
- The projections are open maps (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological), for the product topology and for the box topology alike. They need not be closed; that failure is recorded on this page as a false statement.
- Surjectivity. If every is nonempty then every is surjective. For a natural number this is a theorem of ZF (Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values); for an arbitrary it is the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), and this is the only place in the item where a choice principle is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Topological spaces , the product with the product topology and the projections , a space and a function , and an index .
The product topology on is the initial topology of , and a basis for it is the family of boxes with every open and for all but finitely many ; a basis for the box topology is the family of all boxes with every open (The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space, Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets).
is an open map when is open in the target for every open in the source (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological).
For a topology given as an initial topology of a family : each is continuous, the topology is the coarsest with that property, and a map into it is continuous exactly when every is (Characteristic properties: a map into a space with the initial topology is continuous iff every composite with the defining family is, a map out of a space with the final topology is continuous iff every composite with the defining family is, and the two topologies are respectively the coarsest and the finest making that family continuous, claims 1 and 2; The initial topology of a family of maps into spaces and the final topology of a family of maps out of spaces, and the subspace topology as the model initial topology, Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally).
If is a function with domain a natural number whose values are nonempty sets, then the family of its values has a choice function (Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values, Choice function).
If every member of a family of sets is nonempty then the product of the family is nonempty; this is the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice, Choice function).
The image of a union is the union of the images, and an arbitrary union of open sets is open (Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison).
Proof
By [A1] the product topology is an initial topology, so [L1] gives claim 1 and claim 2 at once, the defining family being .
For a family of functions the assignment defines a function , since has domain and ; it satisfies , and any with for every satisfies for all and , hence .
Let be a box with every open. If then . If , fix ; then , since by definition, and for the function with and for lies in and has .
Assume every is nonempty and is a natural number . By [L2] applied to there is a choice function for the family of values, and defines a point of ; so .
Assume every is nonempty and is arbitrary. By [L3] the product is nonempty.
Both the box topology and the product topology have a basis consisting of boxes, by [A1], and the image of a union of basic sets is the union of their images; so by step 1.3 the image under of any open set of either topology is a union of sets each of which is or an open , hence open. This is claim 3.
Assume every is nonempty and let . By step 1.4 when is a natural number, and by step 1.5 in general, there is a point ; the function with and for then lies in and satisfies . So is surjective, which is claim 4.
Step 1.1 gives claims 1 and 2, step 1.2 gives the bijection between maps into and families of component maps, step 2.1 gives claim 3 and step 2.2 gives claim 4.
Remarks
-
Exactly where choice is spent, and where it is not. Openness of the projections (claim 3) is choice free: step 1.3 uses a single point of the box in question, which is given by the assumption that the box is nonempty, and builds the required preimage from it by changing one coordinate. Surjectivity (claim 4) is different, because there the point has to be produced from nothing but nonemptiness of the factors, and for an infinite index set that is the Axiom of Choice itself.
-
The characteristic property is what makes the product topology the right one. The box topology has no analogue of claim 2: a map into a box-topologised product may have all components continuous and fail to be continuous, and the companion page exhibits the diagonal of doing exactly that.
-
Openness does not survive to closedness. A projection is always open and is in general not closed, and the standard witness, the hyperbola in , is worked in the false statement on this page. There is no asymmetry of taste here: images of open boxes are computed coordinatewise, while a closed set of the product need not be a union of closed boxes at all.
Depends on
- The product set $\prod_{i \in I} X_i$ of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space
- Characteristic properties: a map into a space with the initial topology is continuous iff every composite with the defining family is, a map out of a space with the final topology is continuous iff every composite with the defining family is, and the two topologies are respectively the coarsest and the finest making that family continuous
- The initial topology of a family of maps into spaces and the final topology of a family of maps out of spaces, and the subspace topology as the model initial topology
- Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally
- Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological
- The Axiom of Choice
- Choice function
- Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values
- Topology on a set, open and closed sets, clopen sets, the closed-set axiomatisation, and the coarser/finer comparison
- Basis and subbasis for a topology, and the topology generated by a family of sets
Used by
- A homotopy equivalence induces a bijection between path components Corollary
- Every nonempty contractible space is path-connected Corollary
- In the subspace of ℝ² made of the vertical unit segments over 1/(n+1) together with the two points (0,0) and (0,1), the component of (0,0) is a singleton while its quasicomponent is {(0,0), (0,1)} Counterexample
- On A = ([0,∞) × ℝ) ∪ (ℝ × {0}) the first projection is a quotient map, by the section x ↦ (x,0), and is neither open nor closed Counterexample
- The comb space is path-connected and fails to be locally connected at every point of the limit tooth strictly above the base, so path-connectedness does not imply local connectedness Counterexample
- The diagonal x ↦ (x,x,…) from ℝ into ℝ^ℕ is continuous for the product topology and not for the box topology Counterexample
- The hyperbola {(x,y) : xy = 1} is closed in ℝ² and its image under the first projection is ℝ ∖ {0}, which is not closed Counterexample
- The diagonal Δ_X ⊆ X × X, the diagonal map δ_X, and the pairing ⟨ f, g ⟩ of two maps Definition
- The evaluation map e : C(X,Y) × X → Y, e(f,x) = f(x) Definition
- Every convex subset of ℝⁿ, in particular every ball and ℝⁿ itself, is path-connected and hence connected Example
- For a fixed space X, product with X defines an endofunctor of Top Example
- For every space X, the cylinder X×[0,1] deformation retracts onto X×{0} Example
- ℝ^* is homeomorphic to the unit circle by inverse stereographic projection, and ℕ^* is the ordinal space ω + 1 Example
- ℝⁿ as the product of n copies of the real line: the product topology is the Euclidean topology and the projections are continuous, open and surjective Example
- The Cantor set is homeomorphic to {0,1}^ℕ with the product of discrete topologies, the ternary digits being the coordinates Example
- The coordinate-reading sequence in a compact binary cube has a convergent subnet but no convergent subsequence Example
- The cylinder and the Mobius band as quotients of the square by (0,y) ∼ (1,y) and by (0,y) ∼ (1, 1-y), both by a closed quotient map Example
- The square with opposite edges identified is homeomorphic to the product (ℝ/ℤ) × (ℝ/ℤ) Example
- The zigzag curve and its closure worked out: the components, the path components, and the points at which local connectedness fails Example
- FALSE: the intersection of two connected subspaces is connected False statement
- FALSE: the projections of a product are closed maps False statement
- Arbitrary products of completely regular spaces are completely regular Lemma
- Arbitrary products preserve T₀, T₁, and Hausdorffness Lemma
- Every continuous [0,1]-valued function extends uniquely over the closure of the full evaluation image Lemma
- Finite pointwise minima of continuous maps to [0,1] are continuous Lemma
- For continuous maps into a convex subset of ℝⁿ, the straight-line formula defines a continuous homotopy Lemma
- Homotopy relative to a subspace is reflexive and symmetric Lemma
- Sums, products, absolute values, finite maxima and minima, and quotients of continuous real-valued maps on a topological space are continuous where defined Lemma
- The evaluation map of a point–closed-set separating family is a topological embedding Lemma
- The graph of a continuous map into a Hausdorff space is closed in the product Lemma
- The graph of the piecewise-linear map oscillating between 0 and 1 on the intervals [1/(n+2), 1/(n+1)] is path-connected, its closure adds the segment {0} × [0,1], and that closure is connected, is not path-connected because no path joins the segment to the graph, and is not locally connected Lemma
- Two homotopies relative to the same subspace concatenate after piecewise-linear reparametrisation Lemma
- δ_X is a topological embedding of X onto Δ_X, and ⟨ f, g ⟩ is continuous whenever f and g are Lemma
- What the theory of these constructions still owes at this point in the reading order: preservation of quotient maps under products, separation beyond Hausdorff, and the invariants that tell the glued spaces apart Remark
- Why the criterion is about the product topology, and the choice cost of the compact separation lemmas Remark
- A product of connected spaces is connected in the product topology, and that argument is a theorem of ZF; for an infinite index set it is the assertion that the product of nonempty spaces is nonempty that uses the Axiom of Choice Theorem
- A product of finitely many compact spaces is compact in the product topology Theorem
- Assuming the ultrafilter lemma, an arbitrary product of compact Hausdorff spaces is compact Theorem
- For n≥1, the map H(x,t)=((1-t)+t/‖ x‖₂)x is continuous on (ℝⁿ∖{0})×[0,1], starts at x, ends at radial normalisation, fixes the unit sphere, and never reaches 0 Theorem
- If f : X × Z → Y is continuous then its transpose F : Z → C(X,Y), F(z)(x) = f(x,z), is continuous for the compact-open topology, with no hypothesis on X beyond being metric Theorem
…and 5 more results.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 53 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Product topology (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Axiom of choice (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Munkres, Topology, 2nd ed., §19 (standard reference, not scraped)