Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-04 (gpt-5.6-sol-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The cylinder and the Mobius band as quotients of the square by (0,y)(1,y)(0,y) \sim (1,y) and by (0,y)(1,1y)(0,y) \sim (1, 1-y), both by a closed quotient map

Example

Let S:=[0,1]×[0,1]S := [0,1] \times [0,1] be the unit square, which carries one topology by claim 1 of Products commute with subspaces; for infinite nonempty families, the closure identity Ai=Ai\overline{\prod A_i}=\prod \overline{A_i} uses the Axiom of Choice (For n1n \ge 1 the product topology on nn copies of the usual topology of R\mathbb{R} is the metric topology of dd_\infty on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and hence also of d1d_1 and d2d_2, so Rn\mathbb{R}^n as a product and Rn\mathbb{R}^n as a metric space are one space, Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace, Intervals of R\mathbb{R}: the nine order-convex forms, nondegeneracy, and length). Define two relations on SS, in each case leaving every point not on the two vertical edges alone:

cylinder:(0,y)c(1,y);Mobius band:(0,y)m(1,1y)(y[0,1]).\text{cylinder:}\quad (0,y) \sim_{\mathrm{c}} (1,y); \qquad\qquad \text{Mobius band:}\quad (0,y) \sim_{\mathrm{m}} (1, 1-y) \qquad (y \in [0,1]).

Precisely, c\sim_{\mathrm{c}} has as classes the pairs {(0,y),(1,y)}\{(0,y),(1,y)\} and the singletons {(s,t)}\{(s,t)\} with 0<s<10 < s < 1; m\sim_{\mathrm{m}} has as classes the pairs {(0,y),(1,1y)}\{(0,y),(1,1-y)\} and the same singletons. Write Mc:=S/ ⁣cM_{\mathrm{c}} := S/\!\sim_{\mathrm{c}} (the cylinder) and Mm:=S/ ⁣mM_{\mathrm{m}} := S/\!\sim_{\mathrm{m}} (the Mobius band), each with the quotient topology (The quotient topology of a surjection, quotient maps, saturated sets, and the quotient of a space by an equivalence relation with its canonical projection) and canonical projection PcP_{\mathrm{c}}, PmP_{\mathrm{m}}. Then:

  1. Both projections are closed quotient maps: the saturation of a closed subset of SS is closed, so PcP_{\mathrm{c}} and PmP_{\mathrm{m}} carry closed sets to closed sets (A continuous open surjection, a continuous closed surjection, and a continuous surjection admitting a continuous section are all quotient maps).
  2. The cylinder is (R/Z)×[0,1](\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}) \times [0,1]. With T=R/ZT = \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z} and its open quotient map qq (R/Z\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}: the quotient map is open, and the quotient is homeomorphic to [0,1][0,1] with its endpoints identified), the map Q1:=q×id[0,1]Q_1 := q \times \mathrm{id}_{[0,1]} is an open quotient map R×[0,1]T×[0,1]\mathbb{R} \times [0,1] \to T \times [0,1] and induces a homeomorphism McT×[0,1]M_{\mathrm{c}} \cong T \times [0,1] (Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological).

Nothing here claims that the cylinder and the Mobius band are different spaces. Distinguishing them needs an invariant, and the standard ones are not available at this point in the reading order (What the theory of these constructions still owes at this point in the reading order: preservation of quotient maps under products, separation beyond Hausdorff, and the invariants that tell the glued spaces apart). Both are recorded as constructions, and only the cylinder is identified with a space built earlier.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The square S=[0,1]×[0,1]S = [0,1]\times[0,1]; the relations c\sim_{\mathrm{c}} and m\sim_{\mathrm{m}} with their quotients and projections; the edges E0:={0}×[0,1]E_0 := \{0\}\times[0,1] and E1:={1}×[0,1]E_1 := \{1\}\times[0,1]; T=R/ZT = \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z} with projection qq; the maps Q1:=q×id:R×[0,1]T×[0,1]Q_1 := q \times \mathrm{id} : \mathbb{R}\times[0,1] \to T \times [0,1] and F1:R×[0,1]McF_1 : \mathbb{R}\times[0,1] \to M_{\mathrm{c}}, F1(x,y):=Pc(xx, y)F_1(x,y) := P_{\mathrm{c}}(x - \lfloor x \rfloor,\ y).

[A1]

For a quotient Z/ ⁣Z/\!\sim with projection Π\Pi: Π\Pi is a surjection, WW is open exactly when Π1[W]\Pi^{-1}[W] is open, WW is closed exactly when Π1[W]\Pi^{-1}[W] is closed, and Π1[Π[A]]\Pi^{-1}[\Pi[A]] is the saturation of AA (The quotient topology of a surjection, quotient maps, saturated sets, and the quotient of a space by an equivalence relation with its canonical projection, The adjunction space YfXY \cup_f X glued along a continuous map, and, for a nonempty space, the cone and the suspension as quotients of X×[0,1]X \times [0,1]).

[A2]

qq is a surjective open quotient map with q(x)=q(x)q(x) = q(x') exactly when xxZx - x' \in \mathbb{Z}; for every real xx there is exactly one integer x\lfloor x \rfloor with xx<x+1\lfloor x\rfloor \le x < \lfloor x\rfloor + 1, and x+m=x+m\lfloor x+m\rfloor = \lfloor x \rfloor + m for integers mm (R/Z\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}: the quotient map is open, and the quotient is homeomorphic to [0,1][0,1] with its endpoints identified, Integer part: for every real xx there is exactly one integer mm with mx<m+1m \le x < m + 1, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals).

[L1]

A continuous closed surjection and a continuous open surjection are quotient maps (A continuous open surjection, a continuous closed surjection, and a continuous surjection admitting a continuous section are all quotient maps, clauses 1 and 2); for a quotient map ss and a continuous ff constant on its fibres there is exactly one continuous fˉ\bar f with fˉs=f\bar f \circ s = f (For a quotient map q:XYq : X \to Y, a map out of YY is continuous iff its composite with qq is; a continuous map on XX constant on the fibres of qq factors uniquely through qq; and a composite of quotient maps is a quotient map, claim 2).

[L5]

The pasting technique of The square with opposite edges identified is homeomorphic to the product (R/Z)×(R/Z)(\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}) \times (\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}): a map defined on R\mathbb{R} by taking a fractional part and then applying a quotient projection that identifies the two endpoints of [0,1][0,1] is continuous, because on [m1,m+1][m-1,m+1] it agrees with a map glued from two continuous pieces over the finite closed cover {[m1,m], [m,m+1]}\{[m-1,m],\ [m,m+1]\}, and the open intervals (m1,m+1)(m-1,m+1), mZm \in \mathbb{Z}, cover R\mathbb{R}.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

E0E_0 and E1E_1 are closed in SS: each is the trace on SS of a closed subset of R2\mathbb{R}^2, namely {0}×R\{0\}\times\mathbb{R} and {1}×R\{1\}\times\mathbb{R}, whose complements are open by [L2] and [L4].

L2L4
1.2

The maps τc(0,y):=(1,y)\tau_{\mathrm{c}}(0,y) := (1,y) and τm(0,y):=(1,1y)\tau_{\mathrm{m}}(0,y) := (1,1-y) are homeomorphisms E0E1E_0 \to E_1, being yyy \mapsto y and y1yy \mapsto 1-y read through the homeomorphisms y(0,y)y \mapsto (0,y) and y(1,y)y \mapsto (1,y) of [0,1][0,1] onto E0E_0 and E1E_1, and both are continuous with continuous inverses by [L2], [L3] and [L4].

L2L3L4
1.3

For CSC \subseteq S the saturation of CC under c\sim_{\mathrm{c}} is Cτc[CE0]τc1[CE1]C \cup \tau_{\mathrm{c}}[C \cap E_0] \cup \tau_{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}[C \cap E_1], since the only non-singleton classes are the pairs {(0,y),(1,y)}\{(0,y),(1,y)\}; the same formula with τm\tau_{\mathrm{m}} gives the saturation under m\sim_{\mathrm{m}}.

givenA1
1.4

Q1Q_1 is continuous, surjective and open: continuity and surjectivity are [L2] and [A2] coordinatewise, and Q1[U×V]=q[U]×VQ_1[U \times V] = q[U] \times V for UU open in R\mathbb{R} and VV open in [0,1][0,1], which is open by [A2] and [L2]; images of unions are unions of images. By [L1] it is an open quotient map.

A2L1L2
1.5

Q1(x,y)=Q1(x,y)Q_1(x,y) = Q_1(x',y') exactly when xxZx - x' \in \mathbb{Z} and y=yy = y', by [A2]; so the restriction E:=Q1SE := Q_1 \restriction S has exactly the classes of c\sim_{\mathrm{c}} as its fibres, and EE is continuous by [L3] and surjective, since xx[0,1)x - \lfloor x \rfloor \in [0,1) by [A2].

A2L3
1.6

F1F_1 is constant on the fibres of Q1Q_1, since xxx - \lfloor x \rfloor depends only on the class of xx modulo Z\mathbb{Z} by [A2], and it is continuous by [L5] applied in the first variable, the second variable being untouched, together with [L2] and [L3].

A2L2L3L5
2.1

If CC is closed in SS then CE0C \cap E_0 is closed in E0E_0 and hence in SS by step 1.1 and [L4], so τc[CE0]\tau_{\mathrm{c}}[C\cap E_0] is closed in E1E_1 by step 1.2 and hence in SS; likewise for τc1[CE1]\tau_{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}[C \cap E_1]. So by step 1.3 the saturation of CC is a union of three closed sets, hence closed, and Pc[C]P_{\mathrm{c}}[C] is closed by [A1]. The same argument with τm\tau_{\mathrm{m}} gives the statement for PmP_{\mathrm{m}}.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3A1L4
2.2

By step 1.5 and [L1] applied to the quotient map PcP_{\mathrm{c}} and the continuous EE, there is exactly one continuous Eˉ:McT×[0,1]\bar E : M_{\mathrm{c}} \to T \times [0,1] with EˉPc=E\bar E \circ P_{\mathrm{c}} = E; by step 1.6 and [L1] applied to the quotient map Q1Q_1 of step 1.4 and the continuous F1F_1, there is exactly one continuous Fˉ:T×[0,1]Mc\bar F : T \times [0,1] \to M_{\mathrm{c}} with FˉQ1=F1\bar F \circ Q_1 = F_1.

step 1.4step 1.5step 1.6A1L1
3.1

FˉEˉ=id\bar F \circ \bar E = \mathrm{id} and EˉFˉ=id\bar E \circ \bar F = \mathrm{id}: for (s,t)S(s,t) \in S one has Fˉ(Eˉ(Pc(s,t)))=F1(s,t)=Pc(ss, t)\bar F(\bar E(P_{\mathrm{c}}(s,t))) = F_1(s,t) = P_{\mathrm{c}}(s - \lfloor s \rfloor,\ t), which is Pc(s,t)P_{\mathrm{c}}(s,t) because s=0\lfloor s \rfloor = 0 for s[0,1)s \in [0,1) and (0,t)c(1,t)(0,t) \sim_{\mathrm{c}} (1,t) for s=1s = 1; and for (x,y)R×[0,1](x,y) \in \mathbb{R}\times[0,1] one has Eˉ(Fˉ(Q1(x,y)))=E(xx, y)=Q1(x,y)\bar E(\bar F(Q_1(x,y))) = E(x - \lfloor x\rfloor,\ y) = Q_1(x,y) by [A2]. Both PcP_{\mathrm{c}} and Q1Q_1 are surjective.

step 1.4step 1.5step 2.2A1A2
4.1

Claim 1 is step 2.1, and claim 2 follows from steps 2.2 and 3.1, the maps Eˉ\bar E and Fˉ\bar F being mutually inverse and continuous, hence homeomorphisms.

step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1

Remarks

  • The two constructions differ in one sign and in nothing else. They use the same square, the same two edges and the same kind of relation; the Mobius band glues the left edge to the right edge after reversing it. Claim 1 is proved for both. Claim 2 is not: it identifies the cylinder with (R/Z)×[0,1](\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}) \times [0,1], and no analogous description of the Mobius band is attempted here. Separating the two spaces would need an invariant, and none is claimed here.

  • Why closedness rather than openness. Neither projection is open. Take U:={(s,t)S:s<1/2}U := \{\, (s,t) \in S : s < 1/2 \,\}, which is open in SS; its saturation is U({1}×[0,1])U \cup (\{1\} \times [0,1]), and that is not open in SS, because every neighbourhood in SS of the point (1,1/2)(1,1/2) contains points (s,1/2)(s,1/2) with 1/2<s<11/2 < s < 1, which lie in neither piece. So Pc[U]P_{\mathrm{c}}[U] is not open, and the same computation applies to PmP_{\mathrm{m}}; this is the failure recorded in FALSE: every quotient map is an open map. Closedness holds instead because the two edges are closed and the gluing map between them is a homeomorphism, which is what step 2.1 uses.

  • The cylinder is a product and the Mobius band is not built as one. Claim 2 writes McM_{\mathrm{c}} as T×[0,1]T \times [0,1]; no analogous description is attempted for MmM_{\mathrm{m}}, and none is available at this point in the reading order.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 154 results over 29 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources