Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The diagonal x(x,x,)x \mapsto (x,x,\dots) from R\mathbb{R} into RN\mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}} is continuous for the product topology and not for the box topology

Statement refuted

Refuted: that the box topology has the characteristic property of a product, that is, that a map into iXi\prod_i X_i with all components continuous is continuous for the box topology. Equivalently, this exhibits again that the two topologies differ (FALSE: the product topology and the box topology agree on every product).

Witness. Let P:=RN=kNRP := \mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{N}} = \prod_{k \in \mathbb{N}}\mathbb{R} with every factor carrying the usual topology (The absolute value makes R\mathbb{R} a metric space: d(x,y)=xyd(x,y) = |x-y| is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (xr,x+r)(x-r, x+r), and it is unbounded, Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not), and let

Δ:RP,Δ(t)k:=t(kN)\Delta : \mathbb{R} \to P, \qquad \Delta(t)_k := t \quad (k \in \mathbb{N})

be the diagonal map. Every component πkΔ\pi_k \circ \Delta is the identity of R\mathbb{R}, hence continuous. Then Δ\Delta is continuous for the product topology (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice, claim 2) and is not continuous for the box topology: the box

B  :=  kN(1k+1, 1k+1)B \;:=\; \prod_{k \in \mathbb{N}} \Big(-\tfrac{1}{k+1},\ \tfrac{1}{k+1}\Big)

is box-open and Δ1[B]={0}\Delta^{-1}[B] = \{0\}, which is not open in R\mathbb{R}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: P=kNRP = \prod_{k \in \mathbb{N}}\mathbb{R}, the diagonal Δ\Delta, and the box BB above; 1/(k+1)1/(k+1) abbreviates 1/ι(k+1)1/\iota(k+1) (The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field).

[L3]

For every real η>0\eta > 0 there is a natural m1m \ge 1 with 1/m<η1/m < \eta (For every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon); ι(k+1)1>0\iota(k+1) \ge 1 > 0 and 0<uv0 < u \le v gives 0<1/v1/u0 < 1/v \le 1/u (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order, The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Each component πkΔ\pi_k \circ \Delta is the identity map of R\mathbb{R}, since (πkΔ)(t)=Δ(t)k=t(\pi_k \circ \Delta)(t) = \Delta(t)_k = t; the identity is continuous, its preimages being the sets themselves.

givenL1
1.2

Each factor of BB is a bounded open interval and 1/(k+1)>01/(k+1) > 0 by [L3], so BB is a box with open factors and hence open in the box topology.

A1L2L3
1.3

{0}\{0\} is not open in R\mathbb{R}: for every r>0r > 0 the interval (r,r)(-r,r) contains r/2r/2, which is different from 00; so no bounded open interval around 00 lies inside {0}\{0\}.

L2
2.1

0Δ1[B]0 \in \Delta^{-1}[B], since Δ(0)k=0(1/(k+1), 1/(k+1))\Delta(0)_k = 0 \in (-1/(k+1),\ 1/(k+1)) for every kk by [L3].

step 1.2L2L3
2.2

Δ\Delta is continuous for the product topology, by step 1.1 and [A2].

step 1.1A2
3.1

Δ1[B]={0}\Delta^{-1}[B] = \{0\}: a real tt lies in it exactly when t<1/(k+1)|t| < 1/(k+1) for every kNk \in \mathbb{N}; if t0t \ne 0 then t>0|t| > 0 and [L3] gives a natural m1m \ge 1 with 1/m<t1/m < |t|, and taking k:=m1k := m - 1 contradicts that condition. With step 2.1 this gives the stated equality.

step 2.1L2L3
4.1

By steps 1.2, 3.1 and 1.3 the preimage under Δ\Delta of a box-open set is not open in R\mathbb{R}, so Δ\Delta is not continuous into PP with the box topology, by [L1]; by step 2.2 it is continuous into PP with the product topology, although its components are the same in both cases. That refutes the claim.

step 1.2step 2.2step 3.1step 1.3L1

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 98 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources