Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The diagonal x↦(x,x,… ) from R into RN is continuous for the product topology and not for the box topology

Statement refuted

Refuted: that the box topology has the characteristic property of a product, that is, that a map into ∏iXi with all components continuous is continuous for the box topology. Equivalently, this exhibits again that the two topologies differ (FALSE: the product topology and the box topology agree on every product).

Witness. Let P:=RN=∏k∈NR with every factor carrying the usual topology (The absolute value makes R a metric space: d(x,y)=∣x−y∣ is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (x−r,x+r), and it is unbounded, Metrizable space: a topological space whose topology is induced by some metric; metrizability is topological, the metric is not), and let

Δ:R→P,Δ(t)k:=t(k∈N)

be the diagonal map. Every component πk∘Δ is the identity of R, hence continuous. Then Δ is continuous for the product topology (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice, claim 2) and is not continuous for the box topology: the box

B  :=  ∏k∈N(−1k+1, 1k+1)

is box-open and Δ−1[B]={0}, which is not open in R.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: P=∏k∈NR, the diagonal Δ, and the box B above; 1/(k+1) abbreviates 1/ι(k+1) (The canonical natural ι(n)=n⋅1F of a field).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Each component πk∘Δ is the identity map of R, since (πk∘Δ)(t)=Δ(t)k=t; the identity is continuous, its preimages being the sets themselves.

givenL1
1.2

Each factor of B is a bounded open interval and 1/(k+1)>0 by [L3], so B is a box with open factors and hence open in the box topology.

A1L2L3
1.3

{0} is not open in R: for every r>0 the interval (−r,r) contains r/2, which is different from 0; so no bounded open interval around 0 lies inside {0}.

L2
2.1

0∈Δ−1[B], since Δ(0)k=0∈(−1/(k+1), 1/(k+1)) for every k by [L3].

step 1.2L2L3
2.2

Δ is continuous for the product topology, by step 1.1 and [A2].

step 1.1A2
3.1

Δ−1[B]={0}: a real t lies in it exactly when ∣t∣<1/(k+1) for every k∈N; if t≠0 then ∣t∣>0 and [L3] gives a natural m≥1 with 1/m<∣t∣, and taking k:=m−1 contradicts that condition. With step 2.1 this gives the stated equality.

step 2.1L2L3
4.1

By steps 1.2, 3.1 and 1.3 the preimage under Δ of a box-open set is not open in R, so Δ is not continuous into P with the box topology, by [L1]; by step 2.2 it is continuous into P with the product topology, although its components are the same in both cases. That refutes the claim.

step 1.2step 2.2step 3.1step 1.3L1∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources