How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A pullback in Top is the fibre product with the subspace topology inherited from the product
Example
For continuous maps , the pullback in is
with the subspace topology inherited from the product topology on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed continuous maps.
A pullback represents compatible pairs of maps (Pullbacks and pushouts as limits and colimits of cospans and spans).
Top-limits have the Set-limit as underlying set (Top is complete and cocomplete, and its underlying-set functor preserves all small limits and colimits).
For with the product topology of The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space, a function is continuous exactly when every component is continuous (A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice, claim 2).
A map into a subspace is continuous exactly when its composite with the inclusion is continuous, provided its set map lands there (Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace).
Verification
The restricted coordinate projections are continuous by [F2] and [F3], and their composites with agree by definition of .
If and are continuous with , their unique Set-theoretic pairing lands in by [L1]. Its composite with is , continuous by [F2], so [F3] makes the factor continuous.
Its uniqueness follows from uniqueness of its two coordinate functions. Thus [F1] identifies the displayed space as the pullback.
Depends on
- Pullbacks and pushouts as limits and colimits of cospans and spans
- Top is complete and cocomplete, and its underlying-set functor preserves all small limits and colimits
- The product set $\prod_{i \in I} X_i$ of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space
- A map into a product is continuous iff each of its components is; the projections are continuous and open; and each projection is surjective when every factor is nonempty, which for an infinite index set uses the Axiom of Choice
- Subspace topology: the traces of the open sets, its closed sets and its bases, the continuity of the inclusion, and the characteristic property of a map into a subspace
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 54 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Proposition 3.6.2 (standard reference, not scraped)