How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dominated convergence
Statement
Let and be measurable complex-valued functions such that almost everywhere and almost everywhere for a single nonnegative measurable function with . Then , and hence
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Measurable complex-valued functions with almost everywhere and almost everywhere for one nonnegative measurable function of finite integral.
Reverse Fatou's lemma holds under an integrable majorant (Reverse Fatou's lemma under an integrable majorant).
The integral is linear on (The Lebesgue integral is linear on ).
The integral triangle inequality holds on (The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus).
Real and complex integrability are defined in Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals.
The nonnegative integral is additive, and a nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes (Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral, A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes).
A nonnegative measurable function with finite integral is finite almost everywhere (A nonnegative measurable function with finite integral is finite almost everywhere).
The nonnegative integral is monotone and homogeneous (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
Proof
Let be a measurable null set outside which and , and let . By [L6], the set is null. Put , , Then pointwise, , and is nonnegative, measurable, and finite everywhere. Also By [L5] and [L7], so by [L4].
The functions are nonnegative, converge pointwise to , and are dominated by the finite everywhere majorant . Applying [L1] therefore gives Hence .
Because is supported on the null set , [L5] gives Therefore, by [L2] and [L3], and the right-hand side tends to .
Depends on
- Reverse Fatou's lemma under an integrable majorant
- Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals
- The Lebesgue integral is linear on $L^1(\mu)$
- The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus
- Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral
- A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes
- A nonnegative measurable function with finite integral is finite almost everywhere
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
Used by
- Bounded convergence on a finite measure space Corollary
- Fatou can be strict and domination can fail simultaneously Counterexample
- FALSE: dominated convergence holds without a dominating function False statement
- Continuity under the integral sign Theorem
- Differentiation under the integral sign Theorem
- Integrable simple functions are dense in L¹(μ) Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory Notes, Theorem 4.24 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Theorem 2.24 (standard reference, not scraped)