How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The critical Sobolev embedding is not compact
Statement refuted
Refuted claim. The continuous critical embedding , , is compact.
The witness is the standard concentrating cone: one fixed profile rescaled so that its norm is constant while its support shrinks to a point.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the Axiom of Choice, , , , , and for .
Scaling. For measurable nonnegative and , . (A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not, Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure)
Membership in . Each is Lipschitz on and vanishes on . Its Sobolev trace is therefore zero, because the trace agrees with boundary values for continuous Sobolev functions; the trace-kernel theorem then gives . To establish the missing premise for that chain rule, on the ball put . These smooth functions converge uniformly to , and converges almost everywhere to , with modulus at most . Dominated convergence passes their weak test identities to the limit, proving with that weak gradient for finite . The scalar truncation chain rule then gives the cone gradient and membership. (Dominated convergence, Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives) (Chain rule for globally Lipschitz scalar maps of Sobolev functions, Positive, negative, and truncated Sobolev functions, The trace agrees with classical restriction for continuous Sobolev functions, The kernel of the trace is the closure of the test functions, Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)
Almost-everywhere subsequences. An -convergent sequence has a subsequence converging almost everywhere to a representative of its limit (). (Assuming Countable Choice, -convergent sequences have almost-everywhere convergent subsequences, The space as the quotient by null functions)
Counterexample
By [F1], because , and , while ; by [F2] all lie in , so the sequence is bounded in and converges to almost everywhere and in .
Suppose a subsequence converged in to some . Then by continuity of the norm, while [F3] provides a further subsequence converging almost everywhere to a representative of ; since for every , that representative vanishes almost everywhere, forcing and contradicting the positive norm. Hence no subsequence converges in and the refuted compactness claim is false; the companion subcritical statement Subcritical compactness for on arbitrary bounded open sets shows that the strict inequality cannot be relaxed. The Axiom of Choice is inherited through [F2].
Depends on
- Subcritical compactness for $W^{1,p}_0$ on arbitrary bounded open sets
- Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Positive, negative, and truncated Sobolev functions
- Chain rule for globally Lipschitz scalar maps of Sobolev functions
- A linear map $T$ of $\mathbb{R}^n$ sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with $\lambda_n(T[E])=|\det T|\,\lambda_n(E)$ when $T$ is invertible and $T[E]$ Lebesgue null when it is not
- Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure
- The kernel of the trace is the closure of the test functions
- The trace agrees with classical restriction for continuous Sobolev functions
- Assuming Countable Choice, $L^p$-convergent sequences have almost-everywhere convergent subsequences
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- The Axiom of Choice
- Dominated convergence
- Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
126 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (Aalto University, 2026, complete graduate lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (archived 2025 author manuscript) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (UC Davis, revised 18 June 2014, complete 242-page two-quarter notes) (standard reference, not scraped)