Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let Ω⊆Rn be open, n≥1, let k∈N0, and let u:Ω→C have real and imaginary parts of class Ck. For each multi-index α∈N0n with ∣α∣≤k, the componentwise classical derivative ∂αu is locally integrable and is the weak derivative Dαu. By the uniqueness lemma, it represents the unique locally integrable weak-derivative class. For α=0, this says D0u=u.

If Ω=∅, the assertion is vacuous: there is only the zero class and every displayed test identity is zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, an open set Ω⊆Rn, u∈Ck(Ω;C), k∈N0, and a multi-index α with ∣α∣≤k.

[F1]

By the regular-distribution pairing and signed-transpose convention, the weak test identity is equivalent to ∂αTf=Tg as distributions (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function).

[F2]

Under Countable Choice, classical derivatives of Ck functions are compatible with distributional derivatives: Distributional differentiation is continuous and commutes.

[F3]

Under Countable Choice, a locally integrable weak derivative is unique almost everywhere (Uniqueness of a weak derivative as an almost-everywhere class).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2given

Apply [F2] to u and α. The regular distributions of u and ∂αu are defined, so in particular both functions are locally integrable, and ∂αTu=T∂αu. The Countable Choice use is exactly the comparison of the compactly supported Riemann integrals with the corresponding Lebesgue integrals in [F2].

2.1F1step 1.1given

By [F1], this distributional equality is equivalent to the weak test identity. Explicitly, evaluation on any φ∈Cc∞(Ω) gives (−1)∣α∣∫Ωu Dαφ dx=∫Ω(∂αu)φ dx. Multiplying by (−1)∣α∣ gives the defining weak identity for ∂αu; the sign is its own inverse. Since the test was arbitrary, ∂αu is a weak derivative.

3.1F3step 2.1given∎

The weak derivative class is unique by [F3], so the locally integrable class represented by ∂αu is the class denoted Dαu. When α=0, the identity reduces to u=u.

Sources

  • Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces, Chapter 1 §1.1, printed pp. 2–3: compact-support integration by parts has no boundary term, successive integrations give the multi-index identity, and Remarks 1.3(1) state that classical derivatives through order k are weak derivatives.
  • John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations, Chapter 3 §3.1, printed pp. 47–48, for the weak-derivative integration-by-parts convention.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources