Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The kernel of the trace is the closure of the test functions

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let Ω⊂Rn, n≥2, be a bounded C1 domain and 1≤p<∞. Then the kernel of the trace operator of The Lp trace operator on a bounded C1 domain equals the zero-boundary Sobolev space: {u∈W1,p(Ω;K):Tu=0}=W01,p(Ω;K), the W1,p-closure of Cc∞(Ω) (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; a bounded C1 domain Ω; 1≤p<∞; the trace operator T of The Lp trace operator on a bounded C1 domain; a finite boundary atlas and subordinate ambient partition {χj} as in Finite ambient partitions near compact sets; and the half-space H={xn>0} with its trace T+.

[F1]

T is bounded, Tu=u∣∂Ω for continuous Sobolev classes, and T(ηu)=(η∣∂Ω)Tu for η∈Cc∞(Rn); on a chart, for classes supported inside it, the trace is the transported flat half-space trace. (The Lp trace operator on a bounded C1 domain, The trace agrees with classical restriction for continuous Sobolev functions, The trace commutes with smooth cutoffs and is chart local)

[F2]

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Restrictions of Cc∞(Rn) functions are dense in W1,p of a bounded C1 domain, and on the half-space they are dense as well: the published half-space extension operator followed by approximation in Rn produces them. (Ambient smooth restrictions are dense on bounded C^k domains, Integer-order Sobolev extension from a half-space, Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n))

[F3]

Restriction to an open subset is a contraction on W1,p, and multiplication by a smooth function with bounded value and first derivatives is bounded on W1,p with constants depending on finitely many sup norms of the cutoff. (Bounded restriction and cutoff localisation in Sobolev spaces, Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor)

[F4]

If a class in W1,p vanishes a.e. outside a compact subset of an open set, its zero extension lies in W1,p(Rn) with derivatives the zero extensions. (Compactly supported Sobolev functions extend by zero in every integer order)

[F5]

For 1≤p<∞ and f∈Lp(Rn), ∥f(⋅−hen)−f∥p→0; the same holds componentwise for a W1,p function and each of its weak derivatives. (∥τhf−f∥p→0 in Lp(Rn) as h→0, for 1≤p<∞)

[F6]

Under the declared Axiom of Choice (which supplies Countable and Dependent Choice), On products of sigma-finite measure spaces the double integral of a nonnegative measurable function equals the iterated integrals, and for integrable functions the one-variable fundamental theorem holds: if g is absolutely continuous on [0,∞) with g′ integrable and g has compact support, then ∫0∞g′=−g(0). (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability, Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions)

[F7]

Holder's inequality and the flattening lemma: ∫∣fg∣≤∥f∥p∥g∥p′, and composition with a flattening chart is bounded between the corresponding local W1,p spaces. (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, C^k boundary flattening preserves local W^{k,p})

[F8]

Mollification converges in Lp for p<∞, is smooth, and preserves compact support up to the mollifier radius. Testing and Fubini give Di(ρδ∗f)=ρδ∗Dif for f∈W1,p(Rn), so convergence holds in W1,p componentwise. (Complex translation, convolution, approximate identities, and mollification)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1given

The forward inclusion. Every φ∈Cc∞(Ω) is continuous on Ω‾ and vanishes on a neighbourhood of ∂Ω, so Tφ=0 by [F1]. Since T is bounded and W01,p(Ω) is the closure of Cc∞(Ω) (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure), every class in W01,p(Ω) is a limit of test functions and hence has zero trace.

1.2F2F6F7algebragiven

The half-space zero-extension computation. Let w∈W1,p(H) be compactly supported with T+w=0, and let wˉ be its extension by zero to Rn. Choose wm∈Cc∞(Rn)∣H with wm→w in W1,p(H) by [F2] and let w~m∈Cc∞(Rn) extend wm. Fix φ∈Cc∞(Rn) and i. For each m, integrating the identity ∂i(w~mφ)=∂iw~m φ+w~m∂iφ over H and using [F6]: for i≠n the integral of the tangential derivative vanishes (its inner xi-integral has compact support), and for i=n it equals −∫Rn−1w~m(x′,0)φ(x′,0)dx′; hence ∫Hwm∂iφ=−∫H(∂iwm)φ−δin∫Rn−1(T+wm)φ(⋅,0). Passing to the limit by [F7] (the volume pairings converge because wm→w and ∂iwm→∂iw in Lp and φ,∂iφ are bounded with compact support) and using T+wm→T+w=0 in Lp(Rn−1) gives ∫Hw∂iφ=−∫H(∂iw)φ for every i and every test function. By the definition of the weak derivative on Rn, the zero extension satisfies ∫Rnwˉ ∂iφ=−∫Rn∂iw‾ φ, so wˉ∈W1,p(Rn) with Diwˉ the zero extension of Diw.

2.1F3F5F8step 1.2algebra

Approximation in the half-space by test functions of H. Let w be as in step 1.2. In the notation of [F5], the translates wˉε:=wˉ(⋅−εen) converge to wˉ in W1,p(Rn) as ε↓0, hence their restrictions to H converge to w in W1,p(H) by [F3]. Each wˉε is supported in {xn≥ε}, so for 0<δ<ε/2 the mollifications ρδ∗wˉε lie in Cc∞(Rn) with support in {xn>0} and converge to wˉε in W1,p(Rn) by [F8]; their restrictions lie in Cc∞(H) and converge to w in W1,p(H). Hence every compactly supported class in W1,p(H) with zero flat trace is a limit of test functions of H.

3.1F1F3F4F7F8step 2.1algebragiven

The chart pieces. Let u∈W1,p(Ω) with Tu=0. Choose the finite atlas and partition of [F1] and write u=∑jχju+u0, where u0:=(1−∑jχj)u is supported away from ∂Ω. For each j the class χju is supported in the chart, T(χju)=(χj∣∂Ω)Tu=0 by [F1], and by the chart-transport part of [F1] its flattening wj:=(χju)∘Φj−1, reflected into H, is a compactly supported class in W1,p(H) with T+wj=0; by [F7] the flattening is bounded, and by step 2.1, wj is a W1,p(H)-limit of test functions of the half-space. Multiply the half-space approximants by a fixed smooth cutoff in the flattened ambient patch equal to one near the support of wj, before pulling them back. The resulting pullbacks have compact support inside Ω and converge to χju by [F3] and [F7]; because the charts are only C1, these functions need only be C1, not smooth. For each such compactly supported Sobolev approximant, [F4] and [F8] give a smooth approximation with mollifier radius smaller than its distance to ∂Ω. These lie in Cc∞(Ω) and can be chosen with errors tending to zero. Thus χju∈W01,p(Ω) for every j.

4.1F2F3F4step 1.1step 3.1algebragiven∎

The interior piece and conclusion. The function 1−∑jχj is bounded with bounded first derivatives and vanishes on a neighbourhood of ∂Ω, so u0 vanishes a.e. outside a compact subset of the open set Ω; by [F4] its zero extension lies in W1,p(Rn). By [F2] choose ψm∈Cc∞(Rn) with ψm→uˉ0 in W1,p(Rn), and fix ξ∈Cc∞(Ω) with ξ=1 on a neighbourhood of supp⁡u0; then ξψm∈Cc∞(Ω) and ξψm→ξuˉ0=u0 in W1,p(Ω) by [F3]. Hence u0∈W01,p(Ω). Since W01,p(Ω) is a linear subspace and u=∑jχju+u0 with every summand in it by step 3.1, u∈W01,p(Ω). Together with the forward inclusion of step 1.1, this proves {Tu=0}=W01,p(Ω).

Source notes

Teschl's Lemma 9.21 (printed p. 210) proves both inclusions, including the extension by zero and the translated mollification used above; Laugesen's Corollary 3.15 (printed p. 64), Schikorra's Theorem III.3.22 (printed p. 77) and Hunter's Theorem 3.44 (printed p. 72) record the same identity. The half-space zero-extension computation in step 1.2 replaces the scaffold's reference to a half-space Gauss-Green formula, which is not available for the unbounded half-space as a bounded-C1-domain identity; the direct integration of the tangential and normal derivatives uses only Fubini and the one-dimensional fundamental theorem.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

112 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources