How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The kernel of the trace is the closure of the test functions
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let , , be a bounded domain and . Then the kernel of the trace operator of The trace operator on a bounded domain equals the zero-boundary Sobolev space: the -closure of (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; a bounded domain ; ; the trace operator of The trace operator on a bounded domain; a finite boundary atlas and subordinate ambient partition as in Finite ambient partitions near compact sets; and the half-space with its trace .
is bounded, for continuous Sobolev classes, and for ; on a chart, for classes supported inside it, the trace is the transported flat half-space trace. (The trace operator on a bounded domain, The trace agrees with classical restriction for continuous Sobolev functions, The trace commutes with smooth cutoffs and is chart local)
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Restrictions of functions are dense in of a bounded domain, and on the half-space they are dense as well: the published half-space extension operator followed by approximation in produces them. (Ambient smooth restrictions are dense on bounded C^k domains, Integer-order Sobolev extension from a half-space, Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n))
Restriction to an open subset is a contraction on , and multiplication by a smooth function with bounded value and first derivatives is bounded on with constants depending on finitely many sup norms of the cutoff. (Bounded restriction and cutoff localisation in Sobolev spaces, Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor)
If a class in vanishes a.e. outside a compact subset of an open set, its zero extension lies in with derivatives the zero extensions. (Compactly supported Sobolev functions extend by zero in every integer order)
For and , ; the same holds componentwise for a function and each of its weak derivatives. ( in as , for )
Under the declared Axiom of Choice (which supplies Countable and Dependent Choice), On products of sigma-finite measure spaces the double integral of a nonnegative measurable function equals the iterated integrals, and for integrable functions the one-variable fundamental theorem holds: if is absolutely continuous on with integrable and has compact support, then . (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability, Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions)
Holder's inequality and the flattening lemma: , and composition with a flattening chart is bounded between the corresponding local spaces. (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, C^k boundary flattening preserves local W^{k,p})
Mollification converges in for , is smooth, and preserves compact support up to the mollifier radius. Testing and Fubini give for , so convergence holds in componentwise. (Complex translation, convolution, approximate identities, and mollification)
Proof
The forward inclusion. Every is continuous on and vanishes on a neighbourhood of , so by [F1]. Since is bounded and is the closure of (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure), every class in is a limit of test functions and hence has zero trace.
The half-space zero-extension computation. Let be compactly supported with , and let be its extension by zero to . Choose with in by [F2] and let extend . Fix and . For each , integrating the identity over and using [F6]: for the integral of the tangential derivative vanishes (its inner -integral has compact support), and for it equals ; hence . Passing to the limit by [F7] (the volume pairings converge because and in and are bounded with compact support) and using in gives for every and every test function. By the definition of the weak derivative on , the zero extension satisfies , so with the zero extension of .
Approximation in the half-space by test functions of . Let be as in step 1.2. In the notation of [F5], the translates converge to in as , hence their restrictions to converge to in by [F3]. Each is supported in , so for the mollifications lie in with support in and converge to in by [F8]; their restrictions lie in and converge to in . Hence every compactly supported class in with zero flat trace is a limit of test functions of .
The chart pieces. Let with . Choose the finite atlas and partition of [F1] and write , where is supported away from . For each the class is supported in the chart, by [F1], and by the chart-transport part of [F1] its flattening , reflected into , is a compactly supported class in with ; by [F7] the flattening is bounded, and by step 2.1, is a -limit of test functions of the half-space. Multiply the half-space approximants by a fixed smooth cutoff in the flattened ambient patch equal to one near the support of , before pulling them back. The resulting pullbacks have compact support inside and converge to by [F3] and [F7]; because the charts are only , these functions need only be , not smooth. For each such compactly supported Sobolev approximant, [F4] and [F8] give a smooth approximation with mollifier radius smaller than its distance to . These lie in and can be chosen with errors tending to zero. Thus for every .
The interior piece and conclusion. The function is bounded with bounded first derivatives and vanishes on a neighbourhood of , so vanishes a.e. outside a compact subset of the open set ; by [F4] its zero extension lies in . By [F2] choose with in , and fix with on a neighbourhood of ; then and in by [F3]. Hence . Since is a linear subspace and with every summand in it by step 3.1, . Together with the forward inclusion of step 1.1, this proves .
Source notes
Teschl's Lemma 9.21 (printed p. 210) proves both inclusions, including the extension by zero and the translated mollification used above; Laugesen's Corollary 3.15 (printed p. 64), Schikorra's Theorem III.3.22 (printed p. 77) and Hunter's Theorem 3.44 (printed p. 72) record the same identity. The half-space zero-extension computation in step 1.2 replaces the scaffold's reference to a half-space Gauss-Green formula, which is not available for the unbounded half-space as a bounded--domain identity; the direct integration of the tangential and normal derivatives uses only Fubini and the one-dimensional fundamental theorem.
Depends on
- The $L^p$ trace operator on a bounded $C^1$ domain
- The trace agrees with classical restriction for continuous Sobolev functions
- The trace commutes with smooth cutoffs and is chart local
- The Gauss-Green integration-by-parts formula with Sobolev traces
- Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure
- Ambient smooth restrictions are dense on bounded C^k domains
- Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)
- Compactly supported Sobolev functions extend by zero in every integer order
- C^k boundary flattening preserves local W^{k,p}
- Bounded restriction and cutoff localisation in Sobolev spaces
- Finite ambient partitions near compact sets
- Bounded C^k domains and boundary charts
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Integer-order Sobolev extension from a half-space
- $\|\tau_h f - f\|_p \to 0$ in $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n)$ as $h \to 0$, for $1 \le p < \infty$
- Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions
- The Axiom of Choice
- Complex translation, convolution, approximate identities, and mollification
- Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
112 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (archived 2025 author manuscript) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard S. Laugesen, Linear Analysis and Partial Differential Equations (University of Illinois, complete 158-page graduate notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Armin Schikorra, Partial Differential Equations (University of Pittsburgh, version 4 December 2019) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (revised 18 June 2014, UC Davis, complete 242-page two-quarter notes) (standard reference, not scraped)