How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Gagliardo--Slobodeckij space on Euclidean space
Definition
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) for the measure-theoretic interfaces cited below. Let , , and . Lebesgue measure on and its sigma-algebra are those of Lebesgue measurable sets, the family , and the restricted set function .
For a Lebesgue measurable put The integrand is read as on the diagonal ; the integral is the nonnegative extended integral of The nonnegative Lebesgue integral over the completed product measure of Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability. The Gagliardo-- Slobodeckij space of order and exponent is where is the quotient of the measurable functions by almost-everywhere equality (The space as the quotient by null functions); its elements are classes, and the space is normed by Write also for the value on a class, and call the Slobodeckij seminorm.
Three conventions are part of the definition. First, the diagonal is a Lebesgue-null subset of (its section at every is a single point, so Tonelli gives product measure zero), and on the diagonal the integrand is declared zero; thus the convention changes the integrand only on a null set and does not affect the integral. Second, the integral is a nonnegative extended integral, so is allowed and is a set of classes with finite seminorm; the difference is taken between representatives, and changing representatives on a null set changes the integrand only on a null subset of the product. Third, the definition is stated on classes but representative independence is not assumed here: it is the first clause of Well-definedness of the Slobodeckij seminorm and norm ↗, the item that establishes that this definition is well posed on classes. That the expression is a genuine norm, and that is a vector space, are likewise proved there, not asserted as part of the definition.
On this page the case used is the trace exponent which is available exactly for . For that exponent the weight simplifies to . The endpoint is treated separately on this page and is never described by a space .
Remarks
- Constants have zero seminorm: if almost everywhere then the integrand vanishes identically, so . Adding the term therefore removes the ambiguity only where constants are themselves classes. On with no nonzero constant lies in , since Lebesgue measure is infinite, so on the whole space the term is already sensitive to the difference between a constant and the zero class; the definiteness statement is nevertheless proved, not assumed, in Well-definedness of the Slobodeckij seminorm and norm ↗.
- The weight is not locally integrable at the origin: its radial integral there is . Its tail is integrable, since . With density declared zero on the diagonal, the weighted measure is sigma-finite (exhaust by bounded sets with ), but is not finite on compact neighbourhoods of the diagonal. It has the same null sets as Lebesgue product measure because its density is finite and strictly positive off the null diagonal. Finite seminorms depend on cancellation in ; no equivalence with another function space is asserted here.
Source notes
Schikorra, Section V.1, printed pp. 96-97, defines by the double integral and with the sum norm. Gagliardo, definition (1.3) on printed pp. 288-289, uses the equivalent incremental-quotient description on a compact boundary (extended here to ); Kampanou, printed pp. 18-19, uses the same modular seminorm for the boundary trace space.
Depends on
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- The nonnegative Lebesgue integral
- Lebesgue measurable sets, the family $\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^n)$, and the restricted set function $\lambda_n$
- Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
- A jump boundary datum is outside the trace range for p≥2 Counterexample
- The fractional Sobolev space on a compact C¹ boundary Definition
- A scale integral estimate for mean-zero kernels Lemma
- Chart independence of the fractional boundary norm Lemma
- Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in Slobodeckij spaces Lemma
- The coordinate-direction form of the Slobodeckij seminorm Lemma
- The half-space trace lies in the fractional Slobodeckij space Lemma
- Well-definedness of the Slobodeckij seminorm and norm Lemma
- A bounded right inverse of the half-space trace by normal mollification Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Armin Schikorra, Partial Differential Equations (University of Pittsburgh, version 4 December 2019) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Emilio Gagliardo, Caratterizzazioni delle tracce sulla frontiera relative ad alcune classi di funzioni in $n$ variabili, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova 27 (1957), 284-305 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Maria Kampanou, Trace Theorems for Sobolev Spaces (master's thesis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, July 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)