Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A jump boundary datum is outside the trace range for p≥2

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Choice. The claim that for p≥2 every boundary datum g∈Lp(∂Ω) on a bounded C1 domain Ω⊂R2 is the trace of some u∈W1,p(Ω) is false. Let a boundary chart containing the closed straight segment [0,1] strictly inside its patch be given and let g=1(0,1) be the jump function on that segment, extended by zero. Then g∈Lp(∂Ω) for every p, but for every 2≤p<∞ one has g∉W1−1/p,p(∂Ω): the chart computation gives a divergent Slobodeckij seminorm, and by The sharp trace theorem: boundedness and range in the fractional space no u∈W1,p(Ω) has Tu=g. In particular the Dirichlet datum is not arbitrary in Lp(∂Ω), and the trace range depends on p: for 1<p<2 the same jump function does belong to W1−1/p,p(∂Ω) because 1−1/p<1/p.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; a bounded C1 domain Ω⊂R2 with a boundary chart containing [0,1] strictly inside a straight patch; the jump function g=1(0,1) on that segment, extended by zero; and 1<p<∞ with θ=1−1/p.

[F1]

On a straight chart the boundary norm is that of the Euclidean Slobodeckij space on R: [g]θ,pp=∫R∫R∣g(x)−g(y)∣p∣x−y∣−1−pθdx dy, an extended nonnegative integral, and the boundary space is the set of Lp classes with finite norm. (The Gagliardo--Slobodeckij space on Euclidean space, The fractional Sobolev space on a compact C1 boundary)

[F2]

Assume Countable Choice. For nonnegative measurable functions on a product of sigma-finite spaces the double integral equals the iterated integrals. (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F3]

The trace range of T:W1,p(Ω)→Lp(∂Ω) is exactly Wθ,p(∂Ω) for 1<p<∞. (The sharp trace theorem: boundedness and range in the fractional space)

[F4]

Lp(∂Ω) is the quotient of the boundary-measurable functions by the almost-everywhere zero functions, so a bounded function supported in a finite-measure boundary is an Lp class. (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions)

Counterexample

1.1F1F2algebragiven

The full seminorm of the line jump. Let g=1(0,1) on R and put q=pθ>0. Symmetry and Tonelli give [g]θ,pp=2∫01(∫−∞0(x−y)−1−qdy+∫1∞(y−x)−1−qdy)dx=(2/q)∫01(x−q+(1−x)−q)dx=(4/q)∫01x−qdx. Thus it is finite exactly when q<1, and infinite when q≥1; at q=1 the logarithmic divergence is explicit. Since q=p−1, the threshold is exactly p=2.

2.1F1F3F4step 1.1algebra∎

Transfer to the boundary and conclusion. Because ∂Ω has finite surface measure and the straight chart has bounded density, g∈Lp(∂Ω) is a bounded function on a finite-measure boundary, hence an Lp class by [F4]; choose a subordinate cutoff equal to one near the closed segment. In that atlas its representation is exactly the line jump from step 1.1, while all other localised representations are bounded Lipschitz multiples and coordinate transforms of it. The multiplier and atlas estimates of Chart independence of the fractional boundary norm therefore make the norm finite when p<2 and infinite when p≥2, independently of the atlas. By [F3] the trace range equals the boundary space, so for p≥2 there is no u∈W1,p(Ω) with Tu=g. For 1<p<2, step 1.1 gives pθ<1 and [g]θ,p<+∞, so g is in the trace range in that exponent range: the range genuinely depends on p.

Source notes

Hunter's Section 3.9 (printed p. 73) identifies the trace range for 1<p<∞ with the Besov space B1−1/p,p, which is not all of Lp; Gagliardo's Teorema [1.I] (printed p. 289) states the two-sided condition whose boundary class is a strict subspace of Lp, and Schikorra's Section V.2 (printed pp. 97-98) records the derivative loss. The computation above is elementary and separates the cases p<2 and p≥2 explicitly.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources