Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A scale integral estimate for mean-zero kernels

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let d≥1, 1<p<∞, θ=1−1/p, and let ψ∈Cc(Rd) with ∫Rdψ=0. For t>0 put ψt(y):=t−dψ(y/t). Then for every g∈Lp(Rd) and every T>0, ∫0Tt−p∥g∗ψt∥Lp(Rd)p dt≤C(d,p,ψ)∑i=1d∫0∞h−p∫Rd∣g(x+hei)−g(x)∣pdx dh≤C′(d,p,ψ) [g]θ,pp, with C′ independent of T and of g.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice; d≥1, 1<p<∞, θ=1−1/p; a kernel ψ∈Cc(Rd) with ∫ψ=0 and support in a ball of radius cψ>0; the scaled kernels ψt(y)=t−dψ(y/t) for t>0; a function g∈Lp(Rd); and T>0.

[F1]

Assume Countable Choice. For complex K∈L1(Rd) and f∈Lp, the convolution K∗f exists absolutely a.e., defines a measurable class independent of representatives, and satisfies ∥K∗f∥p≤∥K∥1∥f∥p. (Complex translation, convolution, approximate identities, and mollification)

[F2]

Holder's inequality: for conjugate exponents p,p′ and measurable φ,ψ with φ∈Lp, ψ∈Lp′, ∫∣φψ∣≤∥φ∥p∥ψ∥p′. (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases)

[F3]

Assume Countable Choice. For nonnegative measurable functions on a product of sigma-finite measure spaces the double integral equals the iterated integrals with measurable section integrals. (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F4]

The Euclidean seminorm is the extended double integral [g]θ,p=(∫∫∣g(ξ)−g(η)∣p∣ξ−η∣−d−pθdξ dη)1/p, and it is comparable to the sum of coordinate-direction integrals: [g]θ,pp≤C1(d,p,θ)∑i=1d∫0∞h−1−pθ∫∣g(ξ+hei)−g(ξ)∣pdξ dh, and also ∑i∫0∞h−1−pθ∫∣g(ξ+hei)−g(ξ)∣pdξ dh≤C2[g]θ,pp, with 1+pθ=p. (The Gagliardo--Slobodeckij space on Euclidean space, The coordinate-direction form of the Slobodeckij seminorm)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2algebragiven

The difference form and the pointwise ball estimate. For t>0 one has ∫ψt=0 by the change of variables y↦ty, so for a.e. x the convolution equals g∗ψt(x)=∫Rd(g(x−y)−g(x))ψt(y) dy, the subtracted term ∫g(x)ψt(y)dy vanishing; this is well defined for a.e. x by [F1] and the a.e. finiteness of g. Since ∥ψt∥∞=t−d∥ψ∥∞ and supp⁡ψt⊆B(0,cψt), the absolute value is at most ∥ψ∥∞t−d∫B(0,cψt)∣g(x−y)−g(x)∣dy, and Holder [F2] over that ball gives ∣g∗ψt(x)∣p≤∥ψ∥∞pt−dp(ωdcψdtd)p−1∫B(0,cψt)∣g(x−y)−g(x)∣pdy=C(ψ)t−d∫B(0,cψt)∣g(x−y)−g(x)∣pdy.

2.1F3step 1.1algebra

Integrating in x and t. Integrating the bound of step 1.1 over x and using Tonelli [F3] to exchange the x- and y-integrals gives ∥g∗ψt∥pp≤C(ψ)t−d∫∣y∣≤cψt∫Rd∣g(x−y)−g(x)∣pdx dy=C(ψ)t−d∫∣y∣≤cψtDg(∣y∣,y^) dy, where Dg(r,ω):=∫Rd∣g(x+rω)−g(x)∣pdx and y^:=y/∣y∣. Multiplying by t−p and integrating over t∈(0,T), another application of Tonelli [F3] gives ∫0Tt−p∥g∗ψt∥ppdt≤C(ψ)∫RdDg(∣y∣,y^)(∫0T1{∣y∣≤cψt}t−p−ddt)dy; the inner integral vanishes for ∣y∣>cψT and is at most ∫∣y∣/cψ∞t−p−ddt=cψp+d−1p+d−1∣y∣−(p+d−1), so the left-hand side is at most C′(d,p,ψ)∫RdDg(∣y∣,y^)∣y∣−(p+d−1)dy, a bound independent of T.

3.1F3F4step 2.1algebragiven∎

Identifying the weight and invoking the coordinate-direction form. The substitution y=x+h together with translation invariance of Lebesgue measure and Tonelli [F3] gives ∫RdDg(∣y∣,y^)∣y∣−(p+d−1)dy=∫Rd∥g(⋅+h)−g(⋅)∥pp∣h∣−d−pθdh=[g]θ,pp, because p+d−1=d+pθ at θ=1−1/p. By the comparability clause of [F4], [g]θ,pp≤C1∑i=1d∫0∞h−p∫Rd∣g(ξ+hei)−g(ξ)∣pdξ dh (again 1+pθ=p). Step 2.1 first gives the bound by the seminorm. Combining with both directions of [F4] gives both displayed inequalities, with the second constant independent of T and of g.

Source notes

Mironescu's estimates (11.32)-(11.37) (printed pp. 78-79) bound a mean-zero kernel of scale t by Ct−d on the ball and apply Holder over the ball; Kampanou's estimates leading to (3.6)-(3.7) (printed pp. 24-26) decompose the difference and apply Tonelli; Gagliardo's direct and inverse estimates (printed pp. 290-300) and Schikorra's Section V.2 (printed pp. 98-100) use scaled kernels with vanishing moments of exactly this form. The proof above keeps the T-upper limit through both integrations and drops it only into a convergent tail integral, which is why the final constant does not depend on T.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources