How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Hardy inequality for the averaging operator on the half-line
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let and let be measurable, with . Then equivalently where both sides are extended nonnegative integrals and is allowed on either side. The constant is sharp: for every there is a measurable with . If is supported in for some , then the same inequality holds on , with the same constant.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; an exponent , its conjugate , and a measurable .
Holder's inequality: for conjugate exponents and measurable real-valued with and , , and the right-hand side is finite, so is integrable. (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases)
Assume Countable Choice. For a nonnegative measurable function on a product of sigma-finite measure spaces the iterated and double integrals agree: , with section integrals as in the cited statement. (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability, The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Minkowski's integral inequality: for sigma-finite , , and measurable with , the function lies in and its norm is at most . (Minkowski's integral inequality)
Monotone convergence for the integral: if are measurable and pointwise, then . (Monotone convergence for the integral)
The integral used below is the nonnegative extended integral of a measurable function, which is defined for values in and may be ; it is monotone and additive on nonnegative measurable functions. (The nonnegative Lebesgue integral)
Proof
Reduction to bounded compactly supported . For put , a measurable function with supported in , so that pointwise. Write and ; by [F4] applied to the nondecreasing measurable sequence one has for every , hence and . Therefore it suffices to prove the inequality for every : applying [F4] to both sides then gives , the case included.
The bounded compactly supported case: the dual test function and finiteness. Assume now and outside . Then for all , so is finite on with ; put , a bounded nonnegative measurable function. Its norm satisfies , and because : on the bound gives , and on the bound gives . Thus and .
Sharpness. For set , so . For one has . Given and , this gives . Dividing by and letting , then , shows that no constant smaller than can bound . Each has finite norm: it vanishes below , and above it equals .
The duality identity. With , Tonelli's theorem [F2] applied to the nonnegative measurable function on gives .
The bound on . For substitute , , to get . Apply Minkowski's integral inequality [F3] to on : the hypothesis holds because . The conclusion gives .
The bound for bounded compactly supported . By steps 2.1 and 2.2 and Holder's inequality [F1], . If there is nothing to prove; otherwise by step 1.2, so dividing by gives , which is the claimed inequality for .
The interval case. Let be supported in and extend it by zero to ; the extension has the same integral and its averaging function equals for , so , the middle inequality being the general inequality obtained by combining the reduction of step 1.1 with the bounded-case bound of step 3.1.
Conclusion. Step 1.1 reduces the general measurable case to the bounded compactly supported case, which is step 3.1; step 1.3 shows the constant cannot be improved, and step 4.1 discharges the interval form. This proves both displayed inequalities, the sharpness assertion, and the statement for data supported in .
Source notes
Mironescu, printed p. 78, steps (11.27)-(11.28), applies Hardy's inequality in the radius variable to the same double integral; Kampanou, Chapters 3 and 5, and Teschl, Appendix A, record the boundedness of on with norm , which is the content proved here. The proof above is the standard weighted-dual argument; it uses only Countable Choice through the Fubini-Tonelli interface [F2].
Depends on
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability
- Minkowski's integral inequality
- Monotone convergence for the integral
- The nonnegative Lebesgue integral
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Petru Mironescu, Fine properties of functions: an introduction (Internet Archive capture of the HAL deposit cel-00747696) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Maria Kampanou, Trace Theorems for Sobolev Spaces (master's thesis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, July 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (archived 2025 author manuscript) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Petru Mironescu, Fine properties of functions: an introduction (author-hosted 89-page edition) (standard reference, not scraped)