Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An unbounded stopped exponential martingale needs uniform integrability

Statement refuted

The inference "if Z is a positive continuous local martingale with Z0=1 and τ< almost surely, then EZtτ=1 for all t implies EZτ=1" is false: the equality of the stopped expectations at finite times does not by itself justify optional stopping at an unbounded stopping time. Assume AC and the standing hypothesis (H) of Elementary predictable Brownian integrands. Choose an everywhere-continuous zero-start Brownian realization as in Wiener measure on continuous path space, normalizing the zero-start event as well, and equip this representative with its own usual augmented natural filtration Natural and usual augmented Brownian filtrations. The witness is Zt=exp(Btt/2) and τ=inf{t0:Zt=1/2}; for this pair EZtτ=1 for every finite t, τ< almost surely, yet Ztτ1/2 almost surely and EZτ=1/21, and the stopped family is not uniformly integrable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, (H), an everywhere-continuous zero-start standard Brownian motion B equipped with its usual augmented natural filtration, the process Zt=exp(Btt/2), the level 1/2, the stopping time τ=inf{t:Zt=1/2}, and t>0.

[F1]

Exponential martingale. Z is a positive continuous martingale with EZt=1 for every t, and for θ=2 the same statement applied to exp(2Bt2t) gives Ee2Bt=e2t, hence EZt2=Ee2Btt=et<. The exponential Brownian martingale Brownian motion

[F2]

The level set is hit. On the full-measure event of continuity, logZt=Btt/2 as t because Bt/t0 almost surely by the law of the iterated logarithm; hence Zt0, while Z0=1>1/2, so the intermediate value theorem gives that the continuous path attains the value 1/2 at some finite time and τ< almost surely. Brownian law of the iterated logarithm at infinity Continuity of f:AR at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with limxcf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point Brownian motion Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on [a,b] takes every value between f(a) and f(b)

[F3]

τ is a stopping time. Every path of Z is continuous, so for t>0 the event {τt} equals m1qQ[0,t]{Zq1/2<1/m} identically. A finite infimum of hit times is itself a hit, by continuity and a sequence of hit times decreasing to that infimum. A hit in [0,t] is approximated by rational times; conversely, approximate contacts qm[0,t] have a convergent subsequence by Bolzano–Weierstrass, and continuity gives a hit at its limit. AC permits these countable selections, with positive indices reindexed from zero if required. At t=0 the hit event is empty since Z0=1. Every displayed event is Ft-measurable, so no null-set transfer is needed. Continuous-time stopping times and stopped sigma-algebras Bolzano-Weierstrass: every bounded real sequence has a convergent subsequence The rationals embed densely in the reals Continuity of f:AR at a point of A and on A: the ε-δ condition, its agreement with limxcf(x)=f(c) at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point

[F4]

Finite-grid sampling and maximal domination. The restriction of the all-pairs martingale Z to a finite deterministic grid is a discrete martingale; extend it constantly after the last index. The bounded discrete optional-sampling theorem and the discrete Doob L2 inequality then apply on that grid. Monotone convergence applies to the increasing squares of maxima over nested grids, and Cauchy–Schwarz turns the resulting L2 bound into an integrable dominating supremum. The grid passage is proved in step 1.1. Optional sampling for bounded stopping times Doob Lp maximal inequality Monotone convergence for the integral Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables Dominated convergence Continuous-time filtrations and all-pairs martingales

[F5]

Uniform integrability and L1 limits. If a sequence converges almost surely and is uniformly integrable, then it converges in L1 (a.s. convergence implies probability convergence by dominated convergence of the error-event indicators). Hence its expectations converge to that of the limit. Uniform integrability plus convergence in probability implies L1 convergence A uniformly integrable family Convergence in probability

[F6]

AC bookkeeping. AC is inherited from the Brownian and conditional-expectation interfaces and permits the countable selections of hit times and rational approximate contacts in [F3]. The Axiom of Choice

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

Finite-time means: fix 0<t< and the nested grids rj,n=jt2n, 0j2n. Put Sn=maxjZrj,n. Discrete Doob and [F1] give ESn24EZt2=4et. The grids are nested and dense, and all paths are continuous, so SnS=supstZs. Thus S is measurable, and monotone convergence gives ES24et; Cauchy–Schwarz with the constant one yields ES2et/2<. Let Jn=2n(τt)/t, an integer-valued stopping time for this grid, since {Jnj}={τtrj,n} belongs to Frj,n. It is bounded by 2n. Discrete optional sampling therefore gives EZrJn,n=EZ0=1. These sampled variables converge pointwise to Zτt by continuity and are bounded by the integrable S. Dominated convergence proves EZτt=1. At t=0 the identity is immediate.

F1F3F4given
1.2

Limit of the stopped variables: since τ< almost surely by [F2], for almost every ω and every t>τ(ω) one has Ztτ(ω)=Zτ(ω)=1/2, so Ztτ1/2 almost surely as t. Define the terminal variable as 1/2 on the null event {τ=} as well; it is measurable by finite-time stopped approximation on {τ<}.

F2given
2.1

The contradiction: if the family (Ztτ)t0 were uniformly integrable, then its subfamily at integer times t=n would be uniformly integrable, so [F5] and step 1.2 would give L1 convergence of that sequence and limnEZnτ=E[1/2]=1/2; but step 1.1 gives EZtτ=1 for every finite t. Since 11/2, the family is not uniformly integrable, and the unsupported unit-mean conclusion at the unbounded time τ fails: EZτ=1/21=EZ0.

F4F5step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Boundary and consistency cases: for bounded stopping times τn the identity EZτn=1 does hold, whereas no deterministic bound on τ can hold almost surely: if τT a.s., step 1.1 at T would give 1=EZτ=1/2; the stopping time is finite almost surely, so almost-sure finiteness alone is not enough; the martingale is positive and has EZt=1 for every finite t, so terminal integrability at finite times is not the missing hypothesis; the witness exhibits both the failed conclusion (EZτ=1) and the failed hypothesis (uniform integrability of the stopped family); and AC enters only through [F6].

F1F4F6step 2.1

Source notes

The witness is verified directly from the exponential martingale's Gaussian-conditioning argument, the Brownian LIL and discrete sampling. Only the martingale and moment conclusions of cor-exponential-brownian-martingale are used; its separate Ito integral representation is not invoked. The nested-grid argument supplies the continuous supremum bound required for finite-time dominated convergence.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

142 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources