Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Absolute value and powers of a martingale are submartingales

Statement

Assume AC. If M is a martingale then (Mn) is a submartingale. More generally, for real p1, if EMnp< for every n0, then (Mnp) is a submartingale. We use 0p=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and conventions in the statement.

[F1]

For every real p at least one, the absolute pth power is finite, Borel and convex, including its value zero. Absolute real powers are Borel measurable and convex.

[F2]

A finite convex martingale image is a submartingale when integrable at every time. Convex functions of martingales are submartingales.

[F3]

AC supplies the inherited conditional-expectation existence and any stated choice of versions. The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix p1 and set ϕ(t)=tp on all of R, using ϕ(0)=0. The power lemma supplies finiteness, Borel measurability and convexity, including real noninteger p and the endpoint p=1. Since ϕ(Mn)0, the assumed finite pth moment is exactly its L1 condition. The convex-transform theorem therefore gives E[Mn+1pFn]Mnp a.s. for every n.

givenF1F2
2.1

At p=1, EMn< already follows from the martingale definition, so the first assertion requires no extra moment hypothesis. AC is inherited from the convex-transform theorem and its conditional Jensen argument. For p>1 the moment assumption is retained; no assertion for p<1 is made.

givenF2F3step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources