Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Doob Lp maximal inequality

Statement

Assume AC. Let N∈N0, p>1, and q=p/(p−1). If X=(Xn)n≥0 is a nonnegative submartingale and XN∈Lp, then ∥max⁡0≤k≤NXk∥p≤q∥XN∥p. In particular, for a martingale M with MN∈Lp, ∥max⁡0≤k≤N∣Mk∣∥p≤q∥MN∥p.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses, objects, and conventions in the Statement.

[F1]

Doob L1 maximal inequality gives the refined level inequality with XN restricted to the crossing event.

[F3]

Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases bounds the mixed terminal/maximal moment.

[F5]
[F6]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from F1 and F5 through conditional expectation.

Proof

1.1F1F2

Put XN∗=max⁡k≤NXk and fix r>0. Layer cake and F1 give E(XN∗∧r)p=∫0rpλp−1P(XN∗≥λ) dλ≤∫0rpλp−2E[XN1{XN∗≥λ}] dλ=q E ⁣[XN(XN∗∧r)p−1]. The last identity follows by integrating pλp−2 up to XN∗∧r.

2.1F3step 1.1

Hölder bounds the last expression by q∥XN∥p∥XN∗∧r∥pp−1. If the truncated norm is nonzero, divide by its (p−1)st power; if it is zero, the desired inequality is immediate. Thus ∥XN∗∧r∥p≤q∥XN∥p.

3.1F4step 2.1

Let r↑∞. F4 yields ∥XN∗∥p≤q∥XN∥p, including the case where a priori the maximal moment might be infinite.

4.1F5F6∎

If M is a martingale, ∣Mk∣ is a nonnegative submartingale by F5 and its terminal value is ∣MN∣. Applying step 3.1 proves the second display. AC is exactly the inherited dependence in F6.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources