How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Lp-bounded martingale convergence
Statement
Assume AC. Let . If is a martingale and , then some satisfies almost surely and in . Moreover
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses, objects, and conventions in the Statement.
Doob submartingale convergence theorem gives almost-sure convergence from a uniform positive-part bound.
Doob Lp maximal inequality gives the finite-horizon maximal estimate.
Monotone convergence for the integral and Dominated convergence pass respectively to the infinite maximum and to the limit.
Conditional lp contraction and Multistep martingale characterization identify the terminal conditional expectations.
The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the martingale and conditional-expectation interfaces.
Proof
Since the underlying measure is a probability measure, Hölder gives . In particular . The martingale is also a submartingale, so F1 applies directly to and gives almost surely for a finite integrable .
For each , F2 gives The maxima increase to , so F3 yields the displayed infinite-horizon bound and . In particular almost surely, hence .
We have and pointwise convergence to zero. Dominated convergence gives .
Fix and take . F4 gives . Conditional contraction and step 2.1 imply The left conditional expectations therefore converge to zero while is fixed, proving almost surely. AC has only the inherited role in F5.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- van der Vaart, Martingales, Diffusions and Financial Mathematics, Theorem 2.25 and §2.9, pp. 16, 23–24 (standard reference, not scraped)