Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lp-bounded martingale convergence

Statement

Assume AC. Let p>1. If M is a martingale and C:=supnEMnp<, then some MLp satisfies MnM almost surely and in Lp. Moreover Mn=E[MFn]a.s.,supnMnppp1supnMnp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses, objects, and conventions in the Statement.

[F1]

Doob submartingale convergence theorem gives almost-sure convergence from a uniform positive-part bound.

[F2]

Doob Lp maximal inequality gives the finite-horizon maximal estimate.

[F3]

Monotone convergence for the integral and Dominated convergence pass respectively to the infinite maximum and to the Lp limit.

[F4]

Conditional lp contraction and Multistep martingale characterization identify the terminal conditional expectations.

[F5]

The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the martingale and conditional-expectation interfaces.

Proof

1.1

Since the underlying measure is a probability measure, Hölder gives supnEMnC1/p. In particular supnE(Mn)+C1/p. The martingale M is also a submartingale, so F1 applies directly to M and gives MnM almost surely for a finite integrable M.

F1
1.2

For each N, F2 gives maxkNMkpqsupnMnp,q=pp1. The maxima increase to M=supnMn, so F3 yields the displayed infinite-horizon bound and MLp. In particular MM almost surely, hence MLp.

F2F3
2.1

We have MnMp(2M)p and pointwise convergence to zero. Dominated convergence gives MnMp0.

F3step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Fix n and take mn. F4 gives Mn=E[MmFn]. Conditional Lp contraction and step 2.1 imply E[MmMFn]pMmMp0. The left conditional expectations therefore converge to zero while Mn is fixed, proving Mn=E[MFn] almost surely. AC has only the inherited role in F5.

F4F5

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources