Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Multistep martingale characterization

Statement

Assume AC. For an integrable adapted real process X, the one-step martingale, submartingale or supermartingale condition is equivalent, respectively, to E[XnFm]=Xm,E[XnFm]Xm,E[XnFm]Xma.s. for every 0mn. The conditions are understood separately as in Martingale submartingale and supermartingale.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses and conventions in the statement.

[F1]

Conditional expectations on nested sigma-algebras satisfy the tower identity. Tower property of conditional expectation.

[F2]

Conditional expectation is linear, order preserving and expectation preserving. Basic algebra and order properties of conditional expectation.

[F3]

An integrable variable measurable for the conditioning sigma-algebra conditions to itself. Conditioning a known variable and an independent variable.

[F4]

AC supplies the inherited conditional-expectation existence and any stated choice of versions. The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For n=m, adaptedness and integrability give E[XmFm]=Xm. For the submartingale case fix m and induct on nm. If n>m, nesting and the tower identity give E[XnFm]=E[E[XnFn1]Fm]E[Xn1Fm]Xm. The first inequality uses the one-step hypothesis and conditional order; the second is the induction hypothesis. All conditioned variables are integrable.

givenF1F2F3
2.1

For the supermartingale case the identical tower identity has both inequalities reversed, since conditional order preserves the relation . For the martingale case the inner conditional expectation equals Xn1, so induction gives equality at every pair. Each induction uses only finitely many almost-sure identities. AC here is inherited from the existence of the conditional classes; no representatives at all pairs are selected.

givenF1F2F4step 1.1
3.1

Conversely, each all-pairs condition evaluated at (m,n)=(k,k+1) is its defining one-step condition. This includes k=0, and proves each equivalence.

givenstep 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources