How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Multistep martingale characterization
Statement
Assume AC. For an integrable adapted real process , the one-step martingale, submartingale or supermartingale condition is equivalent, respectively, to The conditions are understood separately as in Martingale submartingale and supermartingale.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses and conventions in the statement.
Conditional expectations on nested sigma-algebras satisfy the tower identity. Tower property of conditional expectation.
Conditional expectation is linear, order preserving and expectation preserving. Basic algebra and order properties of conditional expectation.
An integrable variable measurable for the conditioning sigma-algebra conditions to itself. Conditioning a known variable and an independent variable.
AC supplies the inherited conditional-expectation existence and any stated choice of versions. The Axiom of Choice.
Proof
For , adaptedness and integrability give . For the submartingale case fix and induct on . If , nesting and the tower identity give . The first inequality uses the one-step hypothesis and conditional order; the second is the induction hypothesis. All conditioned variables are integrable.
For the supermartingale case the identical tower identity has both inequalities reversed, since conditional order preserves the relation . For the martingale case the inner conditional expectation equals , so induction gives equality at every pair. Each induction uses only finitely many almost-sure identities. AC here is inherited from the existence of the conditional classes; no representatives at all pairs are selected.
Conversely, each all-pairs condition evaluated at is its defining one-step condition. This includes , and proves each equivalence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, fifth edition (standard reference, not scraped)