Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Weighted-integrable Hp functions have vanishing moments in the atomic range

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let n≥1, 0<p≤1 and s=⌊n(1/p−1)⌋. Suppose f∈Hp(Rn) is represented by a locally integrable function and assume additionally that xαf∈L1(Rn) for every multi-index ∣α∣≤s. Then ∫Rnf(x)xα dx=0(∣α∣≤s). In particular every compactly supported L1 function f∈H1 satisfies ∫Rnf=0, and no compactly supported integrable function of nonzero integral lies in H1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥1, 0<p≤1, s=⌊n(1/p−1)⌋, f∈Hp∩Lloc1 with xαf∈L1 for ∣α∣≤s.

[F1]

Fourier decay: for the fixed kernel, reproducing order and grand-maximal order of the Fourier-decay theorem, every f∈Hp has f^ continuous on Rn∖{0} with ∣f^(ξ)∣≤Cn,p,N,K,φ∥f∥Hp∣ξ∣n(1/p−1) and f^(ξ)=o(∣ξ∣n(1/p−1)) as ξ→0 (Fourier transform decay of real Hp elements).

[F2]

If f∈L1 then f^ is bounded and uniformly continuous on Rn, and f^(ξ)=∫f(x)e−2πix⋅ξdx; if moreover xαf∈L1, then ∂αf^(ξ)=∫(−2πix)αf(x)e−2πix⋅ξdx, so ∂αf^(0)=(−2πi)∣α∣∫xαf (The L1 transform is bounded and uniformly continuous, Fourier differentiation and multiplication identities on tempered distributions).

[F3]

If m≥1, the Peano Taylor formula applies to every real Cm function near 0: g(h)=Tmg(0;h)+o(∣h∣m) (Multivariable Taylor formula with o(∥h∥k) remainder). For a complex-valued function, apply this to its real and imaginary parts and combine the two expansions.

[F4]

At p=1, Atomic characterisation of real Hp for 0<p≤1 gives f=∑jλjaj in S′ with ∑j∣λj∣<∞. The size/support conditions of Hp atoms with a prescribed moment order give ∥aj∥1≤1. Thus the partial sums converge in complex L1 by Complex Lp completeness and almost-everywhere subsequences, and their L1 limit has the same distributional limit since ∣⟨h,χ⟩∣≤∥h∥1∥χ∥∞. Injectivity of Locally integrable functions embed in distributions identifies it a.e. with the given locally integrable representative of f. Hence that representative belongs to L1.

Proof technique: the little-o Fourier decay against the Taylor expansion of f^ at the origin.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F2given

Smoothness of f^ at the origin. For each coordinate, the exponential difference quotient is bounded by 2π∣xj∣, since ∣eiu−1∣≤∣u∣. Iterating dominated convergence with the assumed integrable functions ∣xαf∣ proves the derivative formula in [F2]; dominated convergence applied to each derivative integrand proves its continuity. Since xαf∈L1 for ∣α∣≤s, [F2] gives that f^ is s times continuously differentiable near the origin and that ∂αf^(0) is the Fourier transform of (−2πix)αf at the origin.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

A nonvanishing lowest derivative contradicts the little-o decay. Suppose some ∂αf^(0)≠0 with ∣α∣≤s, and choose such an α of minimal total degree m. Put γ=n(1/p−1)≥0. If m=0, then f^(0)≠0; choose any unit vector η. Continuity from [F2] gives ∣f^(tη)∣≥∣f^(0)∣/2 for all sufficiently small t>0, contradicting [F1], which says f^(tη)=o(tγ) and hence tends to zero. If m≥1, every derivative of order below m vanishes. By [F2], f^ is Cm near 0, so [F3] applied to its real and imaginary parts gives, for fixed η∈Rn, f^(tη)=tmQ(η)+o(tm)(t↓0),Q(η)=∑∣β∣=m∂βf^(0)β!ηβ. This complex homogeneous polynomial is not identically zero, so choose a unit vector η with Q(η)≠0. Then ∣f^(tη)∣≥ctm for all sufficiently small t>0. Since m≤s=⌊γ⌋≤γ, one has tm≥tγ for 0<t≤1, contradicting [F1]. Thus every ∂αf^(0) with ∣α∣≤s vanishes.

3.1step 2.1F2algebra

Conclusion. By [F2], ∂αf^(0)=(−2πi)∣α∣∫xαf for every ∣α∣≤s; step 2.1 shows these derivatives all vanish, so ∫xαf=0 for ∣α∣≤s. For p=1 one has s=0, so the integral of f vanishes; applying this to a compactly supported L1 function f∈H1 gives ∫f=0, and a compactly supported L1 function with ∫f≠0 cannot be in H1.

4.1step 3.1F4given∎

Remark on the hypothesis. For p=1 every H1 function that is a locally integrable function automatically has f∈L1 by [F4], so the "compactly supported L1" formulation is a special case; for p<1 the hypothesis xαf∈L1 is a genuine additional assumption. This corollary proves the stated vanishing moments and no more.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources