How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fatou can be strict and domination can fail simultaneously
Statement refuted
Whenever almost everywhere and each is integrable, Fatou's lemma is an equality and dominated convergence is automatic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The spike sequence on .
Fatou's lemma is only a one-sided inequality (Fatou's lemma).
Dominated convergence requires one integrable majorant for the whole sequence (Dominated convergence).
Counterexample
The sequence converges pointwise almost everywhere to , but for every .
Therefore [step 1.1, L1, L2] ∎ so Fatou is strict, and the unchanged integral also shows that no dominated convergence conclusion can hold. This is exactly the hypothesis loss recorded in [L1] and [L2].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory Notes, Example 4.18 (standard reference, not scraped)