How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A pointwise limit of integrable functions need not be integrable
Statement refuted
Every pointwise limit of integrable functions is integrable.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Counting measure on and the functions .
Counting measure is a measure on (Counting measure on an arbitrary set, Counting measure is a measure).
Integrability means finiteness of the integral of the modulus (Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals).
Counterexample
Each has finite support, so it is integrable on [L1, L2, given] .
For every , one has . The pointwise limit is the [step 1.1, L1, L2, algebra] ∎ constant function , whose integral under counting measure is , so it is not integrable by [L2]. Thus the Statement is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Axler, Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, Example 2.55 (standard reference, not scraped)