Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A strongly continuous unitary group need not be norm continuous

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Choice. On H=L2(R;C) let U(t)f(x)=eitxf(x). Then U is a strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group that is not norm continuous: U(t)I=2 for every t0. Its generator is iQ, where Q is the position operator, and no strongly continuous semigroup that is norm continuous at zero has an unbounded generator; since iQ is unbounded, norm continuity fails, confirming the computation below. Here a strongly continuous semigroup on a real or complex Banach space X means bounded linear maps S(t) for t0 with S(0)=I, S(t+s)=S(t)S(s) and continuous orbit maps; its generator is Gx=limh0(S(h)xx)/h, on exactly the vectors where this norm limit exists.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

A family U:RB(H) with U(0)=I, U(s+t)=U(s)U(t) and unitary values is a strongly continuous unitary group exactly when the orbit maps are continuous; for L2 functions, continuity follows from dominated convergence (Strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group, Dominated convergence).

[A2]

For the position operator Q the spectral PVM is E(B)f=1Bf, so eitQf(x)=eitxf(x) by the functional calculus (Position operator on L^2(R)).

[A3]

The group generated by a self-adjoint T has generator iT (A self-adjoint operator generates a strongly continuous unitary group).

[A4]

The operator norm is the supremum over the unit ball, and TxTx; hence ABAB by applying these bounds successively (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).

[A5]

If X is Banach then B(X) is complete in operator norm (If (Y) is Banach then (\mathcal B(X,Y)) is Banach). The bounded-generator assertion will be proved below, rather than assumed from the group definition.

[A6]

The stated AC assumption is inherited through the position-operator and spectral-generation suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

Counterexample

technique · direct

Given: H=L2(R;C) and U(t)f(x)=eitxf(x).

1.1

Multiplication by eitx is well defined on almost-everywhere classes, preserves the L2 norm, and has inverse multiplication by eitx. The scalar exponential identities give U(s)U(t)=U(s+t) and U(0)=I, so U is a unitary group.

A1given
1.2

By the position-operator example U(t)=eitQ, and by the generation lemma its generator is iQ on D(Q)={f:x2f(x)2dx<}. These are the uses of AC inherited in [A6]. For positive integers n, fn=1[n,n+1] has norm one, belongs to D(Q), and satisfies Qfnn. Thus this generator is unbounded.

A2A3A6
1.3

For t0, eitx12 gives U(t)I2. At x0=π/t the absolute value equals 2. Given 0<ε<2, continuity supplies δ>0 such that it exceeds 2ε on the finite interval J=(x0δ,x0+δ). The vector 1J/2δ has norm one and its image under U(t)I has norm at least 2ε. Letting ε0 proves U(t)I=2. At t=0 the norm is zero.

A4given
1.4

To prove the general assertion, let S be a semigroup on a Banach space X as defined in the statement, with S(h)I0 as h0. If X={0} its generator is the zero operator on all of X. Otherwise choose a>0 so that S(h)2 for 0ha. For 0sT, write s=ka+r with 0r<a and kT/a; the semigroup law gives S(s)MT:=2T/a+1. Consequently, for 0stT, S(t)S(s)MTS(ts)I. Thus S is uniformly continuous in operator norm on every compact time interval.

A4given
2.1

For each fH, U(t)ff2=eitx12f(x)2dx0 by dominated convergence, with majorant 4f2. This applies along every sequence t0, hence gives continuity at zero. The group law and isometry give U(t)fU(t0)f=U(tt0)ff, proving continuity at every t0.

A1step 1.1
2.2

On a compact interval define the operator integral of S by tagged Riemann sums. To justify existence, uniform continuity in step 1.4 bounds the difference between a sum and any refinement by the interval length times the modulus of continuity at the original mesh. Comparing two sums through their common refinement proves the Cauchy property as both meshes tend to zero. Completeness in [A5] gives the limit, independent of tags and partitions. The triangle inequality for sums gives cdF(s)ds(dc)sup[c,d]F(s) for the continuous integrands used here. Linearity, subdivision, translation of intervals, and interchange with a fixed bounded operator follow first for sums and then for their limits. Put Bτ=0τS(s)ds. Then τ1BτIsup0sτS(s)I<1 for sufficiently small τ>0.

A4A5step 1.4
3.1

For such τ, let C=Iτ1Bτ and q=C<1. The series R=n=0Cn converges in operator norm: its tails are bounded by the geometric tails qn, and [A5] gives completeness. Telescoping finite sums and the product bound in [A4] give (IC)R=R(IC)=I. Thus Bτ is invertible with bounded inverse τ1R.

A4A5step 2.2
4.1

For h>0, the semigroup law and the integral identities from step 2.2 yield S(h)IhBτ=1h(ττ+hS(s)ds0hS(s)ds)S(τ)I in operator norm, by continuity at τ and at zero and the integral bound. Hence BτXD(G) and GBτ=S(τ)I. Since Bτ is onto, D(G)=X and G=(S(τ)I)Bτ1 is bounded. There is no additional factor 1/τ in this last formula with the unnormalized integral Bτ.

A4step 1.4step 2.2step 3.1
5.1

Restrict U to nonnegative times. Its right generator extends the two-sided generator iQ: on D(Q) the two-sided limit from step 1.2 in particular gives the right limit. If U were norm continuous at zero, step 4.1 would make this right generator bounded on all of H, contradicting the unit vectors fn in step 1.2. This corroborates the direct computation in step 1.3 and completes all claims.

step 2.1step 1.2step 1.3step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

39 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources