How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A non-Dini continuous Poisson source can destroy the continuity of the second derivatives
Statement refuted
The assertion that continuity of a compactly supported source suffices for the Newtonian potential to be of class with continuous second derivatives is false; the counterexample and its verification are in the next section.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the dimension , any function and source with the properties constructed in the counterexample below, and the sign convention with of Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian.
The only choice assumption is Countable Choice , used through the measure, polar and potential interfaces cited below; no full Axiom of Choice is used. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
is continuous: with as , and is smooth on ; moreover . The Newtonian potential of the bounded compactly supported is absolutely finite at every and locally bounded. (Newtonian potential of compactly supported data, Bounded compact data give an everywhere finite Newtonian potential, Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of )
for , and the mixed kernel is with ; polar integration on uses . (Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian, Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma)
For integrable parameter-dependent functions differentiable in the parameter, differentiation under the integral is valid when the parameter derivatives are measurable and bounded by one integrable majorant throughout a parameter neighbourhood. Repeated differentiation requires this hypothesis at each order. If the resulting derivatives are also pointwise continuous in the parameter under such majorants, dominated convergence makes the parameter integral derivatives continuous. (Differentiation under the integral sign, Dominated convergence)
For every , every compactly supported continuous with finite -Hölder seminorm has with second derivatives locally -Hölder and pointwise; in particular this applies to every and to every function. (Hölder data give a classical Newtonian solution, Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls)
A smooth cutoff equal to one on a compact set and supported in a prescribed larger open set exists (rescalings of a fixed bump), and the mean value theorem bounds an increment by a derivative supremum times the length of the segment. (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls, The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with , maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space)
If functions converge pointwise under one integrable majorant, their integrals converge (Dominated convergence).
The refuted claim: continuity of a compactly supported continuous source implies that the Newtonian potential is with continuous second derivatives.
Counterexample
Choose a smooth scalar cutoff with on and on . In define , for , and for . Then is continuous at , smooth on , equals for , and is supported in . Put for and . The claim refuted is that such a continuous compactly supported source forces to be with continuous second derivatives.
Proof technique: direct.
Continuity, smoothness away from , and support. Since is bounded by and , for and ; as near , is continuous there. For , both and the angular factor are smooth, so is smooth there. It vanishes for , hence is compactly supported in and the potential is everywhere absolutely finite by [F1].
and its first derivatives are kernel convolutions. Fix , a coordinate , and , and write , . Then while the candidate derivative is , which is absolutely finite because is locally integrable and is bounded with compact support. On , local integrability of the logarithmic kernel gives On , the segment from to stays at distance at least from the origin, so the mean-value estimate for gives Since the support of is bounded, the integral of this error is at most for a fixed finite containing that support. Thus . For in a fixed compact neighborhood of any , choose one ball containing all supports of ; after the change of variables above, and are integrals on dominated respectively by and , both integrable there. For any sequence , pointwise continuity of and [F6] give and ; sequential continuity on proves continuity of and each . Hence by the definition of . Inserting [F2] gives .
The truncated Hessian integral. With and , the angular factor gives , so by [F2] and polar integration, for , where and the collects the region , on which and . Since on , the last expression equals : the truncated integrals diverge and the principal value does not exist.
Away from the origin second derivatives are finite and continuous. Let and choose, by [F5], a cutoff on with . By step 1.1, is smooth away from , so ; [F4] gives near . For , one has on . Thus for and , . The integrand is smooth in there, and it and all its -derivatives are dominated by constants times on the bounded support. Repeated differentiation under the integral sign [F3] shows that is smooth on . Hence is near every with finite continuous second derivatives there.
The second derivative at does not exist. By step 2.1, for , Split at . On the integrand is bounded by , whose integral over the ball of radius is , so this part contributes after division by . On the second-order Taylor formula along the segment from to , together with the homogeneity of (degree ) and the mean value bound [F5] for its second derivatives (degree ), writes the integrand divided by as , and . The main term is exactly the integral of step 2.2 with , equal to as . Hence the difference quotients of at diverge to and does not exist; a fortiori near the origin, and its second derivatives are not continuous there.
Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 2.1--3.1 exhibit a continuous compactly supported source whose Newtonian potential is well defined and , is away from one point, but fails to be twice differentiable at that point; the truncated Hessian integrals at diverge like . Therefore continuity of the source does not imply continuity of the second derivatives of , and the counterexample refutes exactly that overclaim. The Hölder hypothesis of Hölder data give a classical Newtonian solution is used there only through a Dini-type small-scale estimate, and has , so the failure occurs precisely at the modulus threshold.
Remarks
- The source is continuous and compactly supported but not Hölder continuous at the origin: if , then for , so . No exact equality of the modulus with its radial profile is needed. The example therefore isolates the small-scale modulus as the exact input needed by the Newtonian regularity theorem, beyond mere continuity.
Depends on
- Newtonian potential of compactly supported data
- Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian
- Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
- Hölder data give a classical Newtonian solution
- Bounded compact data give an everywhere finite Newtonian potential
- Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls
- Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of $\mathbb{R}^n$
- Differentiation under the integral sign
- Dominated convergence
- A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
- The mean value theorem, as the case $g(x) = x$ of Cauchy's: for $f$ continuous on $[a,b]$ with $a < b$ and differentiable on $(a,b)$ there is $c \in (a,b)$ with $f(b) - f(a) = f'(c)(b-a)$
- $C^k$ maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
105 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Xu-Jia Wang, Schauder Estimates for Elliptic and Parabolic Equations (Australian National University, 2006; complete 7-page note) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2025 archived author manuscript, complete 392 pages) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (UC Davis, revised 18 June 2014; complete 242-page graduate notes) (standard reference, not scraped)