Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A non-Dini continuous Poisson source can destroy the continuity of the second derivatives

Statement refuted

The assertion that continuity of a compactly supported source f suffices for the Newtonian potential Nf to be of class C2 with continuous second derivatives is false; the counterexample and its verification are in the next section.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, the dimension n=2, any function h and source f with the properties constructed in the counterexample below, and the sign convention −ΔΦ=δ0 with Φ(x)=−(2π)−1log⁡∣x∣ of Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian.

[A1]

The only choice assumption is Countable Choice ACω, used through the measure, polar and potential interfaces cited below; no full Axiom of Choice is used. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F1]

f is continuous: ∣f(x)∣≤h(∣x∣) with h(r)→0 as r↓0, and f is smooth on {x≠0}; moreover supp⁡f⊆B‾1/3(0)⊆B‾1/2(0). The Newtonian potential Nf(x)=∫Φ(x−y)f(y) dy of the bounded compactly supported f is absolutely finite at every x and locally bounded. (Newtonian potential of compactly supported data, Bounded compact data give an everywhere finite Newtonian potential, Euclidean spheres and closed balls as subspaces of Rn)

[F2]

∂iΦ(z)=−zi/(2π∣z∣2) for z≠0, and the mixed kernel is ∂1∂1Φ(z)=cos⁡(2θ)/(2π∣z∣2) with z=∣z∣(cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ); polar integration on R2 uses r dr dθ. (Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian, Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma)

[F3]

For integrable parameter-dependent functions differentiable in the parameter, differentiation under the integral is valid when the parameter derivatives are measurable and bounded by one integrable majorant throughout a parameter neighbourhood. Repeated differentiation requires this hypothesis at each order. If the resulting derivatives are also pointwise continuous in the parameter under such majorants, dominated convergence makes the parameter integral derivatives continuous. (Differentiation under the integral sign, Dominated convergence)

[F4]

For every 0<α<1, every compactly supported continuous g with finite α-Hölder seminorm has Ng∈C2(R2) with second derivatives locally α-Hölder and −ΔNg=g pointwise; in particular this applies to every g∈Cc∞(R2) and to every Cc0,α function. (Hölder data give a classical Newtonian solution, Local Hölder and scaled C-two-alpha norms on balls)

[F5]

A smooth cutoff equal to one on a compact set and supported in a prescribed larger open set exists (rescalings of a fixed bump), and the mean value theorem bounds an increment by a derivative supremum times the length of the segment. (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls, The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a), Ck maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space)

[F6]

If functions converge pointwise under one integrable majorant, their integrals converge (Dominated convergence).

[L0]

The refuted claim: continuity of a compactly supported continuous source f implies that the Newtonian potential Nf is C2 with continuous second derivatives.

Counterexample

Choose a smooth scalar cutoff η∈C∞([0,∞);[0,1]) with η=1 on [0,1/4] and η=0 on [1/3,∞). In R2 define h(0):=0, h(r):=η(r)/log⁡(1/r) for 0<r<1/3, and h(r):=0 for r≥1/3. Then h is continuous at 0, smooth on (0,∞), equals 1/log⁡(1/r) for 0<r≤1/4, and is supported in [0,1/3]. Put f(x):=h(∣x∣) x12−x22∣x∣2 for x≠0 and f(0):=0. The claim refuted is that such a continuous compactly supported source forces Nf to be C2 with continuous second derivatives.

Proof technique: direct.

1.1givenF1algebraA1

Continuity, smoothness away from 0, and support. Since (x12−x22)/∣x∣2 is bounded by 1 and h≤1, ∣f(x)∣≤h(∣x∣) for x≠0 and f(0)=0; as h(r)=1/log⁡(1/r)→0 near 0, f is continuous there. For x≠0, both h(∣x∣) and the angular factor are smooth, so f is smooth there. It vanishes for ∣x∣≥1/3, hence is compactly supported in B‾1/3(0) and the potential is everywhere absolutely finite by [F1].

2.1step 1.1F1F2F6algebra

Nf∈C1 and its first derivatives are kernel convolutions. Fix x∈R2, a coordinate i, and h≠0, and write z=x−y, r=∣h∣. Then Nf(x+hei)−Nf(x)h=∫Φ(z+hei)−Φ(z)hf(x−z) dz, while the candidate derivative is Gi(x):=∫∂iΦ(z)f(x−z) dz, which is absolutely finite because ∣∂iΦ(z)∣≤C∣z∣−1 is locally integrable and f is bounded with compact support. On ∣z∣≤2r, local integrability of the logarithmic kernel gives 1r∫∣z∣≤2r(∣Φ(z+hei)∣+∣Φ(z)∣)∣f(x−z)∣ dz+∫∣z∣≤2r∣∂iΦ(z)f(x−z)∣ dz≤C∥f∥∞r(1+∣log⁡r∣)→0. On ∣z∣>2r, the segment from z to z+hei stays at distance at least ∣z∣/2 from the origin, so the mean-value estimate for D2Φ gives ∣Φ(z+hei)−Φ(z)h−∂iΦ(z)∣≤Cr∣z∣−2. Since the support of f(x−⋅) is bounded, the integral of this error is at most C∥f∥∞r∫2rRxs−1ds=o(1) for a fixed finite Rx containing that support. Thus ∂iNf(x)=Gi(x). For x′ in a fixed compact neighborhood of any x0, choose one ball BR containing all supports of f(x′−⋅); after the change of variables above, Nf(x′) and Gi(x′) are integrals on BR dominated respectively by ∥f∥∞∣Φ∣ and ∥f∥∞∣∂iΦ∣, both integrable there. For any sequence xj→x0, pointwise continuity of f and [F6] give Nf(xj)→Nf(x0) and Gi(xj)→Gi(x0); sequential continuity on R2 proves continuity of Nf and each Gi. Hence Nf∈C1 by the definition of C1. Inserting [F2] gives ∂1Nf(x)=−(2π)−1∫(x1−y1)∣x−y∣−2f(y) dy.

2.2step 1.1F2algebra

The truncated Hessian integral. With z=r(cos⁡θ,sin⁡θ) and cos⁡2θ=2cos⁡2θ−1, the angular factor gives z12−z22=r2cos⁡2θ, so by [F2] and polar integration, for 0<ε<1/4, ∫ε<∣z∣<1∂1∂1Φ(−z)f(z) dz=12π∫ε1/4h(r)r dr∫02πcos⁡22θ dθ+O(1)=12∫ε1/4h(r)r dr+O(1), where ∫02πcos⁡22θ dθ=π and the O(1) collects the region 1/4<∣z∣<1, on which ∣h∣≤1 and ∣∂1∂1Φ∣≤(2π)−1∣z∣−2. Since ∫h(r)r−1dr=−log⁡log⁡(1/r) on (0,1/4), the last expression equals 12log⁡log⁡(1/ε)+O(1)→+∞: the truncated integrals diverge and the principal value p.v.∫∂1∂1Φ(−z)f(z) dz does not exist.

2.3step 1.1F3F4F5algebra

Away from the origin second derivatives are finite and continuous. Let x≠0 and choose, by [F5], a cutoff χ=1 on B‾(x,∣x∣/4) with supp⁡χ⊂B(x,∣x∣/2). By step 1.1, f is smooth away from 0, so χf∈Cc∞⊂Cc0,1/2; [F4] gives N(χf)∈C2 near x. For g:=(1−χ)f, one has g=0 on B(x,∣x∣/4). Thus for x′∈B(x,∣x∣/8) and y∈supp⁡g, ∣x′−y∣≥∣x−y∣−∣x−x′∣≥∣x∣/8>0. The integrand Φ(x′−y)g(y) is smooth in x′ there, and it and all its x′-derivatives are dominated by constants times ∣g(y)∣ on the bounded support. Repeated differentiation under the integral sign [F3] shows that Ng is smooth on B(x,∣x∣/8). Hence Nf is C2 near every x≠0 with finite continuous second derivatives there.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2F2F5algebra

The second derivative at 0 does not exist. By step 2.1, for t≠0, ∂1Nf(te1)−∂1Nf(0)t=−12πt∫(te1−y∣te1−y∣2+y∣y∣2)1f(y) dy. Split at ∣y∣=2∣t∣. On ∣y∣≤2∣t∣ the integrand is bounded by C∥f∥∞(∣y∣−1+∣te1−y∣−1), whose integral over the ball of radius 2∣t∣ is O(∣t∣), so this part contributes O(1) after division by t. On ∣y∣≥2∣t∣ the second-order Taylor formula along the segment from −y to te1−y, together with the homogeneity of ∂1Φ (degree −1) and the mean value bound [F5] for its second derivatives (degree −3), writes the integrand divided by t as ∂1∂1Φ(−y)f(y)+O(∣t∣ ∣y∣−3) f(y), and ∫∣y∣≥2∣t∣∣t∣ ∣y∣−3∣f(y)∣ dy≤C∣t∣∫2∣t∣1/2s−2ds=O(1). The main term is exactly the integral of step 2.2 with ε=2∣t∣, equal to 12log⁡log⁡(1/(2∣t∣))+O(1)→+∞ as t→0. Hence the difference quotients of ∂1Nf at 0 diverge to +∞ and ∂1∂1Nf(0) does not exist; a fortiori Nf∉C2 near the origin, and its second derivatives are not continuous there.

4.1step 1.1step 2.2step 3.1step 2.3given∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 2.1--3.1 exhibit a continuous compactly supported source f whose Newtonian potential is well defined and C1, is C2 away from one point, but fails to be twice differentiable at that point; the truncated Hessian integrals at 0 diverge like 12log⁡log⁡(1/ε). Therefore continuity of the source does not imply continuity of the second derivatives of Nf, and the counterexample refutes exactly that overclaim. The Hölder hypothesis of Hölder data give a classical Newtonian solution is used there only through a Dini-type small-scale estimate, and h(r)=1/log⁡(1/r) has ∫01/4h(r)r−1dr=+∞, so the failure occurs precisely at the modulus threshold.

Remarks

  • The source f is continuous and compactly supported but not Hölder continuous at the origin: if ωf(r):=sup⁡∣x−y∣≤r∣f(x)−f(y)∣, then ωf(r)≥∣f(re1)−f(0)∣=1/log⁡(1/r) for 0<r≤1/4, so ∫01/4ωf(r)r−1dr=∞. No exact equality of the modulus with its radial profile is needed. The example therefore isolates the small-scale modulus as the exact input needed by the Newtonian regularity theorem, beyond mere continuity.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

105 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources