How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
Statement
Let and . Then there exists a smooth function such that on and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Real numbers .
The standard smooth step function is smooth, takes values in , vanishes on , and equals on (The standard smooth step function).
Coordinate differentiation uses the one-variable chain, sum and product rules (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with , Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ). Smoothness means that every iterated coordinate derivative exists and is continuous ( maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space).
The support is the closure of the nonzero locus (The support of a function on and its compactly supported Riemann integral).
Proof
Put and , and define and . The coordinate derivatives of are , , and zero at every higher order, so is smooth. Here is when and otherwise.
Every iterated coordinate derivative of is a finite sum of products of derivatives of and factors : induction follows by applying the chain and product rules in [L1] to each factor. These factors are continuous by [F1] and step 1.1, so is smooth.
If , then , so ; if , then , so . Also by [F1].
The nonzero locus lies in , whose closure is contained in the closed ball . Thus [F2] gives , since . Together with steps 2.1 and 2.2 this proves the claim.
Depends on
- The standard smooth step function
- $C^k$ maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space
- The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if $g$ is differentiable at $c$ and $f$ is differentiable at $g(c)$, then $f \circ g$ is differentiable at $c$ with $(f \circ g)'(c) = f'(g(c))\,g'(c)$
- Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: $(f+g)'(c) = f'(c) + g'(c)$, $(\alpha f)'(c) = \alpha f'(c)$, $(fg)'(c) = f'(c)g(c) + f(c)g'(c)$, and $(f/g)'(c) = \bigl(f'(c)g(c) - f(c)g'(c)\bigr)/g(c)^{2}$ when $g(c) \ne 0$
- The support of a function on $\mathbb{R}^n$ and its compactly supported Riemann integral
Used by
- Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^k,p(Rⁿ) Corollary
- Geodesics are exactly critical points of energy with fixed endpoints Corollary
- Interior gradient bound for Poisson solutions Corollary
- Weak differentiation has a closed graph on its natural domains Corollary
- A hypersurface jump is not W^1,p Counterexample
- A non-Dini continuous Poisson source can destroy the continuity of the second derivatives Counterexample
- A nonzero boundary value creates a zero-extension jump Counterexample
- A step has no locally integrable weak derivative Counterexample
- Boundary H² regularity needs domain regularity Counterexample
- Boundary W^2,p regularity needs more than Lipschitz boundary Counterexample
- Bounded discontinuous elliptic coefficients need not give H² solutions Counterexample
- Finite speed of propagation does not imply strong Huygens Counterexample
- Point evaluation is unbounded below the Sobolev continuity threshold Counterexample
- Subcritical W^1,p is not closed under multiplication Counterexample
- The strong Huygens principle in the homogeneous Cauchy setting Definition
- A normalized compactly supported top form on Euclidean space Example
- A point source produces a uniform expanding sphere Example
- A radial bump on Euclidean space Example
- A two-dimensional interior tail Example
- Broken trajectories in an index-two torus moduli space Example
- Dilation determines the Riesz-potential target exponent Example
- L² forcing defines an H⁻¹ functional Example
- Sharp Sobolev threshold for a radial power Example
- The Morse complex of the circle Example
- The Morse complex of the two-sphere Example
- Compactly supported cohomology is contravariant for every smooth map False statement
- A Euclidean bump for a compact set inside an open set Lemma
- Caccioppoli inequality for truncated subsolutions Lemma
- Compactly supported top cohomology propagates across overlapping oriented coordinate balls Lemma
- Every integer is realized by a map to the sphere Lemma
- Heat-ball representation formula Lemma
- Local W^2,p regularity of weak solutions of the Poisson equation Lemma
- Locally finite smooth partitions of unity on domains Lemma
- Logarithmic Caccioppoli estimate for positive supersolutions Lemma
- Moser iteration for positive supersolutions: negative-power and logarithmic comparison Lemma
- Nondegenerate local Hölder coordinates for a Hölder coefficient Lemma
- Peak functions at strongly pseudoconvex boundary points, by a dbar correction Lemma
- Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in L² Lemma
- Smooth finite point motions extend to disk isotopies Lemma
- Sobolev level-set step: energy decay with explicit level gap and radius loss Lemma
…and 17 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)
- Will J. Merry, Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nigel Hitchin, Differentiable Manifolds (standard reference, not scraped)