How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Smooth compactly supported functions of an open set are dense in
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let be open with and . Then is dense in : for every and every there is with . Consequently is dense in , and if a class satisfies for all , then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; an open set with ; ; a class ; and a tolerance .
classes and zero extension: is a space of almost-everywhere classes with norm and pairing ; the zero extension of , equal to on and off , is a well-defined class in with (The space as the quotient by null functions, Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions, Integral over a measurable subset).
A continuous real function on a nonempty compact metric space attains its minimum (A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value). Exhaustion tools: a closed and bounded subset of is compact (Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line), and for nonempty the function is -Lipschitz, hence continuous (, so the distance to a fixed nonempty set is -Lipschitz).
Mollifier existence: A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls gives a smooth equal to on and supported in . Its support has finite measure by Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of has finite outer measure, and its inner ball contains a positive-volume box by A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included, so . Thus is a real unit-mass smooth bump supported in ; radiality is unnecessary.
Monotone and dominated convergence: a nondecreasing sequence of nonnegative measurable functions has integral limit equal to the integral of its pointwise limit, and a sequence dominated by one integrable function has integrals converging to the integral of its pointwise limit (Monotone convergence for the integral, Dominated convergence).
Global smoothing: if , Hölder on each finite-measure compact set makes locally integrable (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases, Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of has finite outer measure). Its convolution with the real unit-mass bump of [F3] is smooth on all of by Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign. The rescaled family is that of The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump.
Approximate identity convergence: a mollifier family is an approximate identity (A unit-mass smooth bump generates an approximate identity), and for every and one has as (Every approximate identity converges to the identity in for ).
Zero-boundary Sobolev space: every lies in because its classical derivatives are weak derivatives (Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms), and is by definition the closure of in the norm (Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure).
Inner product: on the pairing of [F1] is an inner product inducing the norm ( with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space), and Cauchy--Schwarz gives (Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs).
Proof
If , use . Otherwise, for , when , set ; when , set . By [F2] each is compact and contained in , the sets increase, and : in the proper-open-set case every point has positive distance from the complement by openness.
Let be the zero extension of [F1] and let . Since , the sequence decreases pointwise to and is bounded by the integrable function ; hence by dominated convergence, and pointwise. Equivalently, the integrals increase to by monotone convergence, so the same limit follows. Choose with .
Put for the selected in step 2.1, with a representative zero outside . Then . If , and already has error less than ; hence assume . Consider every pair with , and . The balls cover , so compactness gives a finite nonempty subcover ; put . If and , some covering ball gives , so . Thus . This sumset is compact: it is bounded, and for a point outside it the continuous function attains on a minimum greater than , so its complement is open.
Choose the unit-mass smooth bump constructed in [F3], and put for . By [F5] this is smooth globally. If , every has , while off ; hence the defining integral is zero. Its support therefore lies in the compact set , so .
By [F6], . Choose with this norm less than and set . Since vanish outside , .
Density of in follows because and were arbitrary in step 5.1. Consequently is dense in : given and , step 5.1 supplies with , and by [F7]. Finally let satisfy for every . By density choose classes with ; then Cauchy--Schwarz [F8] gives , so and .
Depends on
- Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Integral over a measurable subset
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump
- A radial mollifier family in Rn
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Zero-boundary Sobolev space as a norm closure
- Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives
- $|d(x,A) - d(y,A)| \le d(x,y)$, so the distance to a fixed nonempty set is $1$-Lipschitz
- A Euclidean bump for a compact set inside an open set
- $L^2$ with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space
- Interior mollification commutes with weak derivatives
- A unit-mass smooth bump generates an $L^1$ approximate identity
- Cauchy–Schwarz: $|\langle x,y\rangle|\le\|x\|\,\|y\|$, with equality exactly for dependent pairs
- Dominated convergence
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- Every $L^1$ approximate identity converges to the identity in $L^p$ for $1 \le p < \infty$
- Monotone convergence for the integral
- The support of a convolution lies in the closure of the support sumset
- Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign
- A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
- Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ has finite outer measure
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- A continuous real-valued function on a nonempty compact metric space is bounded and attains a greatest and a least value
Used by
- The L² operator associated with a symmetric elliptic form Definition
- The associated elliptic operator is densely defined, symmetric and lower bounded Lemma
- The normal second derivative is recovered from the equation Lemma
- The symmetric shifted solution operator is positive and self-adjoint Lemma
- Higher eigenvalues by orthogonality-constrained minimisation Theorem
- Interior H² regularity for divergence-form equations Theorem
- The first positive Neumann eigenvalue has the mean-zero Rayleigh characterisation Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
150 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (UC Davis, revised 18 June 2014, complete 242-page notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard S. Laugesen, Linear Analysis and Partial Differential Equations (University of Illinois, 2020, complete 158-page graduate notes) (standard reference, not scraped)