How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Cauchy–Schwarz: , with equality exactly for dependent pairs
Statement
For all vectors in a real or complex inner-product space,
with equality if and only if and are linearly dependent.
Facts & Assumptions
The pairing is linear in the first argument, conjugate-linear in the second, conjugate symmetric and positive definite, and the induced length satisfies with and exactly for (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).
The induced length is the unique nonnegative square root of the diagonal pairing, and positive definiteness makes the radicand a nonnegative real (The norm induced by a real or complex inner product).
Every nonnegative real has a unique nonnegative square root: there is exactly one with for each (Existence and uniqueness of -th roots: a unique with ).
For complex scalars , , and exactly for (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
For real scalars , exactly for , and (Basic properties of the absolute value).
For nonnegative reals, if and only if (Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives).
A finite list is linearly dependent when some choice of scalars, not all zero, makes the corresponding combination vanish; for the two-element list this means that for scalars not both zero (Linear independence: a finite list is independent when forces every , and a subset is independent when every injective finite list into is independent).
Proof
Given: Vectors in a real or complex inner-product space . In the real case read conjugation as the identity and as the absolute value of , so that [A4] is replaced by [A5].
If , then by conjugate-linearity in the second argument, and ; hence , while are dependent with witness scalars because and .
Suppose now and set , a well-defined scalar because ; expanding with linearity in the first argument, conjugate-linearity in the second and conjugate symmetry gives .
Multiplying step 1.2 by the positive number gives , and since , and are nonnegative, monotonicity of squaring on the nonnegatives gives the inequality .
If are dependent, then either , which is step 1.1, or for some scalar with ; in the second case and with both norms nonnegative, so by uniqueness of nonnegative square roots, and .
Conversely suppose and ; then and step 1.2 gives , so by positive definiteness, that is and the pair is dependent by [A7]; together with steps 1.1 and 2.2 this proves the inequality and both directions of the equality statement.
Depends on
- Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length
- The norm $\lVert v\rVert=\sqrt{\langle v,v\rangle}$ induced by a real or complex inner product
- Existence and uniqueness of $n$-th roots: a unique $a^{1/n} \ge 0$ with $(a^{1/n})^n = a$
- Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, $z\overline z=|z|^2$, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive
- Basic properties of the absolute value
- Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives
- Linear independence: a finite list $v : n \to V$ is independent when $\sum_{i<n} \lambda_i v_i = 0_V$ forces every $\lambda_i = 0_F$, and a subset $S \subseteq V$ is independent when every injective finite list into $S$ is independent
Used by
- A separable infinite-dimensional Hilbert space is ℓ² Corollary
- The induced length is a norm Corollary
- An inner-product space need not be complete Counterexample
- Numerical range and numerical radius Definition
- The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator Definition
- Trace of a trace class operator Definition
- Adjoint, norm and trace of an operator of rank at most one Example
- Integral operator trace under a valid diagonal hypothesis Example
- Volterra operator is Hilbert Schmidt and quasinilpotent Example
- Laplace resolvents of a unitary group Lemma
- Norm of a self adjoint operator from its quadratic form Lemma
- Nuclear series characterizes trace norm Lemma
- Orthogonal complements are closed Lemma
- Scalar and complex measures from a pvm Lemma
- Spectrum of a positive operator is nonnegative Lemma
- Square-summable orthogonal families have norm-convergent finite sums Lemma
- The generator of a unitary group is closed and skew-adjoint Lemma
- The inner product is jointly continuous Lemma
- Weak and strong additivity of orthogonal projections Lemma
- A Hilbert space with a given orthonormal basis is ℓ² of the index set Theorem
- Cyclicity of the trace Theorem
- Existence of a maximal orthonormal family, and maximality as completeness Theorem
- Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space Theorem
- Hilbert Schmidt operators form a two sided ideal Theorem
- Hilbert-adjoint identities Theorem
- Min-max principle below the essential spectrum Theorem
- Numerical radius is an equivalent operator norm Theorem
- Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family Theorem
- Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces Theorem
- The norm completion of an inner-product space is a Hilbert space Theorem
- Trace class iff product of two Hilbert Schmidt operators Theorem
- Trace is absolutely convergent and basis independent Theorem
- Von Neumann parameterization of self-adjoint extensions Theorem
- Weyl criterion for the essential spectrum Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar Salamon, Functional Analysis, §1.3.3, Lemma 1.40, p.38 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Lin and Casey Rodriguez, MIT 18.102 Introduction to Functional Analysis, Lectures 15–16 (standard reference, not scraped)