How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Boundary regularity needs more than Lipschitz boundary
Statement refuted
A weak-solution regularity assertion that replaces the boundary hypothesis by mere Lipschitz regularity is false; this does not refute the a priori estimate Global Dirichlet estimate on a domain, whose hypothesis already requires . The reentrant sector below is a bounded Lipschitz domain, but not a domain at its vertex. Let with , put , and define . Choose a smooth radial cutoff supported in and equal to near , and let . Choose so that for . Then , for every finite , and weakly. However, near , so Hence this weak solution is not in for those exponents (in particular not in ). The reentrant corner shows why weak boundary regularity requires more than a Lipschitz chart.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , , the sector (with , ), the harmonic profile , a radial cutoff with on , and , and .
The only choice principle used is Countable Choice ; no full Axiom of Choice is used. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
Weak solutions of with zero boundary values are the classes with for every ; by density it suffices to test against . (Weak Dirichlet solutions for a divergence-form operator, The Laplacian of a function and of a vector field)
In polar coordinates on the open sector, for ; the Lebesgue integral of a radial function is . (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma)
For every there is a radial cutoff with on , and . (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls)
A class lies in precisely when it and all its weak derivatives through order two lie in . In particular, failure of integrability of a second weak derivative excludes membership; converges if and only if . (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)
Counterexample
The profile is harmonic and vanishes on the two sides. For one has, by [F2], so is harmonic on the sector (in particular ). Moreover and , so vanishes on the two radial sides of ; at the reentrant vertex the sector has interior angle , so is a bounded Lipschitz domain that is not there.
The localized profile is in . Since and (the gradient of the harmonic profile has absolute value because the angular factor contributes a unit vector in polar coordinates), the integrals and converge; hence with support in . To approximate in by functions: first truncate radially, with equal to near and to for every . This transition need not be compactly supported: remains compactly supported because is supported in . The estimate follows from near the vertex. Next cut off in the angular variable with a smooth vanishing for and for and equal to for . For each fixed , the squared error is , hence the norm error is : near either side , the angular cutoff derivative is on strips of angular width , and the resulting radial weight is integrable. The resulting functions are supported in a compact subset of the open sector and can be mollified there, so by definition of the closure.
The forcing is smooth and bounded, and the weak equation holds. Since is harmonic, on the sector; the right-hand side is supported in the annulus where and its gradient are smooth up to the two radial sides for , so and hence for every finite . For integration by parts on the compactly contained support gives ; both sides are continuous in in the norm, so the identity holds for every by [F1]: is a weak solution of with zero boundary values.
The second derivatives diverge exactly above the threshold. On one has , a function homogeneous of degree ; write on the sector branch. Direct differentiation gives , and . Thus the Frobenius Hessian norm is , so there are constants with on (by the displayed nonvanishing norm, since ). By [F2], which by [F4] diverges exactly when , that is . Using gives , so the weak solution is not in for those exponents; taking (which is allowed because ) shows in particular that .
Conclusion. On the bounded Lipschitz reentrant domain there is a weak solution of with , which fails to lie in for every . Thus smooth data and a Lipschitz boundary alone do not guarantee weak-solution regularity. This example is not a counterexample to the a priori estimate Global Dirichlet estimate on a domain, whose domain already assumes ; it makes no claim that the estimate’s boundary hypothesis is necessary.
Remarks
- The mechanism is the corner exponent : the harmonic profile grows like , its first derivatives like (square-integrable already for , since the radial gradient integral is ; the zero-boundary closure was proved in step 1.2), and its second derivatives like , which is not -integrable for large because the radial weight in two dimensions is (equal to when ).
- The failure is purely at the vertex, not at the sides: the two radial sides are straight, and on each of them the localized solution is smooth for . This isolates the reentrant corner as the obstruction, in contrast to convex corners, where improves the integrability threshold, but the Hessian is still unbounded when ; it is bounded when .
Depends on
- Global $W^{2,p}$ Dirichlet estimate on a $C^{1,1}$ domain
- Weak Dirichlet solutions for a divergence-form operator
- The Laplacian of a $C^2$ function and of a $C^2$ vector field
- Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
- A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2025 archived author manuscript, complete 392 pages) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Villavert, Elementary Theory and Methods for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations (2017; complete 220-page lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Armin Schikorra, Partial Differential Equations I & II (version October 1, 2025; complete 281-page graduate lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)