How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compactly supported cohomology is contravariant for every smooth map
Statement
False. Pullback makes compactly supported de Rham cohomology contravariant for every smooth map, without a properness condition.
Facts & Assumptions
Proper smooth maps pull back compactly supported forms proves and uses properness exactly to make the right-hand set compact.
A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls supplies a smooth equal to one near zero and supported in .
Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line makes the closed bounded support in [F2] compact and, conversely, shows that the unbounded real line is not compact.
Refutation
Given: The smooth constant map , .
Take the bump from [F2], with . Its support is closed and bounded, hence compact by [F3], so . Pullback in degree zero is composition, and therefore on all of .
The support of the constant-one function is , which is not compact by [F3] (equivalently, the open cover has no finite subcover). Hence . Pullback therefore fails even to define the proposed compact-support cochain map, so it cannot induce the claimed contravariant cohomology map.
Here is nonproper because the compact singleton has inverse image ; this is exactly the obstruction isolated by [F1]. The zero input still pulls back to compact support and an empty source would be vacuous, but neither repairs the universal assertion. The example is already in degree zero and dimension one, has no boundary endpoints, and uses one explicit bump with no choice principle.
Depends on
- Proper smooth maps pull back compactly supported forms
- A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
40 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Robbin–Salamon, Introduction to Differential Topology, compactly supported pullback discussion (standard reference, not scraped)