Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Proper smooth maps pull back compactly supported forms

Statement

Let F:MN be a smooth map of finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifolds, possibly with boundary. Suppose F is proper, meaning that F1(K) is compact in M for every compact subset KN. Then pullback sends Ωck(N) linearly into Ωck(M) for every integer k. More precisely, supp(Fω)F1(suppω). The containment holds for every smooth map; properness is used to make the set on the right compact. No choice axiom or orientation is needed.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Compactly supported de Rham cohomology defines the compact-support spaces and includes the local support and compact-closed-subset verification.

[F2]

The de Rham complex and pullback extend to manifolds with boundary gives smooth linear pullback, including boundary targets, by its local coordinate formulas.

[F3]

Smooth maps between manifolds with boundary defines smooth maps as continuous maps with the stated local smooth extensions.

[F4]

Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space gives the closed support and smallest-closed-superset properties.

Proof

Given: F as in the statement and ωΩck(N), with K=suppω.

1.1

The complement NK is open by [F4], and ω vanishes identically there. Since F is continuous by [F3], U=F1(NK) is open. For xU, the pullback formula in [F2] evaluates ωF(x)=0 on the images under dFx of any tangent vectors, so (Fω)x=0. Thus the nonzero locus of Fω is contained in the closed set MU=F1(K). Taking its closure and using [F4] proves the support containment. This step does not use properness.

F1F2F3F4given
2.1

Properness makes F1(K) compact because K is compact. The left-hand support S in step 1.1 is closed in M. To verify its compactness, add MS to any ambient open cover of S; this covers F1(K). By [F5] take finitely many covering members and discard MS. The remaining finite family still covers S, so [F5] makes S compact. Therefore FωΩck(M) by [F1]. Linearity is the same pointwise linearity of [F2], restricted to these vector subspaces.

F1F2F5step 1.1given
3.1

For k<0 or when the source form is forced to be zero by dimension, pullback is zero. In degree zero it is ordinary composition of functions, and step 1.1 applies unchanged; in degree one it evaluates ω on dFxv. A rank-deficient or constant map may make the inclusion strict, which is harmless; no equality of supports was used. Empty manifolds and zero forms give empty supports. Boundary points are included in [F2], and properness still refers to compact sets in the whole manifold, including its boundary. Only one given compact support and a finite subcover were used, so no choice principle enters.

F1F2F3F5step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources