Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compactly supported de Rham cohomology

Definition

Let M be a finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold, possibly with boundary. Let Ωck(M) be the smooth k-forms with compact support in M, and put it equal to zero for k<0 or k>dimM. With the locally extendible boundary convention, exterior differentiation restricts to these spaces and gives the compactly supported de Rham complex (Ωc(M),d). Its cohomology is Hck(M)={ωΩck(M):dω=0}{dη:ηΩck1(M)}. Thus equality of two closed compactly supported representatives requires a compactly supported primitive for their difference. If M is compact this is the ordinary de Rham complex and cohomology. No orientation or choice axiom is required.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Compact support of a differential form defines support as the closure in M of the nonzero locus and includes genuine boundary points; zero has empty support.

[F2]

De rham cochain complex gives the ordinary boundaryless complex and degree convention.

[F3]

The de Rham complex and pullback extend to manifolds with boundary supplies the linear local derivative and d2=0, also at a boundary.

[F4]

Interior, closure, boundary, exterior, derived set and isolated point in a topological space gives the smallest-closed-superset property and the open complement of a closure.

Verification

Given: M as stated and compactly supported forms ω,η of the same degree.

1.1

For scalars a,b, the nonzero locus of aω+bη is contained in suppωsuppη, a closed set by [F4]. Its closure is therefore contained there too. The union is compact: restrict any ambient open cover to its two compact subsets, take a finite subcover for each by [F5], and unite those two finite families. A closed subset F of this compact union is compact as well: adjoin the open set MF to an ambient cover of F, take a finite subcover of the union and discard that added member. By [F5] this is the intrinsic compactness of F. Applying this to the closed support of aω+bη proves that Ωck(M) is a vector subspace. The empty support includes zero.

F1F4F5given
2.1

Outside suppω the form is identically zero on the open complement supplied by [F4]. The local coefficient formula in [F3] makes dω zero on that same open set, including any boundary-chart points. Thus its nonzero locus lies in the closed set suppω, and so does its closure: supp(dω)suppω. The support on the left is a closed subset of the compact support on the right, hence compact by the cover argument in step 1.1. Therefore d restricts to the stated subspaces.

F1F3F4F5step 1.1
3.1

The restricted differential is linear and squares to zero by [F3]. Its image in degree k is consequently a vector subspace of its kernel, so the displayed quotient is defined. Two closed representatives differ by zero in this quotient exactly when their difference equals dη for some ηΩck1(M); a primitive without compact support does not satisfy this definition. When M is compact, every support is closed in M, so step 1.1 makes it compact and Ωck(M)=Ωk(M) in every degree. By [F2] and [F3] the complexes and their quotients then agree.

F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

On the empty manifold all spaces are zero. In degree zero the denominator is zero because Ωc1=0; in degree one it consists exactly of differentials of compactly supported functions. In dimension zero there are no positive-degree forms. In top degree the outgoing derivative is zero, while the incoming compact-support requirement remains in force. All support statements are intrinsic and independent of coordinates; no orientation, countable family of primitives or partition of unity was used.

F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources