How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Integration is an isomorphism on top compactly supported de Rham cohomology
Statement
Let be a nonempty connected oriented smooth manifold without boundary. With the finite-localization integral, the map , , is an isomorphism. More explicitly, a compactly supported top form has integral zero if and only if it is the derivative of a compactly supported -form. For this means that the zero form has the zero negative-degree primitive. The theorem holds in ZF, without a choice axiom.
Facts & Assumptions
Compactly supported top cohomology propagates across overlapping oriented coordinate balls supplies normalized bump top forms, compact primitives for zero-integral forms supported in a ball, and equality of normalized ambient classes across an overlap.
Integration descends to compactly supported top de Rham cohomology supplies the well-defined linear map and vanishing on compact exact forms.
Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes gives the finite-localization integral using connected coordinate domains.
Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets excludes two disjoint nonempty opens covering .
Compactly supported de Rham cohomology gives the compact-support quotient, its linear operations and zero negative degrees.
A chart bump at a point with prescribed support gives a smooth function equal to one at a specified point and supported in any prescribed open neighborhood.
The standard smooth step function gives a smooth equal to zero on and to one on .
A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it gives finite subcovers by ambient open sets. Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line, A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism and A closed subspace of a compact space is compact, and a finite union of compact subspaces is compact give compactness of closed coordinate balls, their chart preimages, and closed subsets thereof.
Proof
Given: A manifold as stated. A ball below means a coordinate ball as in [F1].
Choose one ball and one normalized compact bump in it, possible by nonemptiness and [F1]. Let be the union of all balls reachable from by a finite sequence of coordinate balls with consecutive nonempty overlaps, allowing a sequence of length zero. It is an open set containing . If , take any coordinate ball about . If met , it would meet a ball at the end of some finite chain; adjoining would put , contradicting . Thus , and the complement is open. By [F4] and , . This defines the set of all finite chains and proves their existence when needed, without choosing a chain at every point.
Let and put . For every , restrict a chart about to a coordinate ball whose closed coordinate ball lies inside the original chart. The latter closure is compact by [F8]. Apply [F6] inside and consider the set of all resulting pairs with for some . Their opens cover , so [F8] retains finitely many supported in coordinate balls . Each support is compact: it is closed, lies in the corresponding compact closed coordinate ball, and [F8] applies. Put , using [F7], and define where and zero where . This is smooth because on the neighborhood of the possible zero denominator. Each has compact support in , and wherever , a neighborhood of . Thus with compactly supported inside the ball . If is empty, take the empty sum. All integrals below are the finite-localization integrals of [F3]. Set . Choose one normalized bump inside each of these finitely many balls using [F1]. The form has integral zero by [F2] and has compact support inside by [F5]. By [F1], it is for an ambient compact primitive. Hence .
For each of the finitely many , step 1.1 supplies a finite overlap chain from to : choose a point in , use its membership in , and append to the chain containing that point. Choose normalized bumps in the finitely many intermediate balls by [F1]. Consecutive normalized classes agree by [F1], so transitivity along the finite chain gives . This also holds for the zero-length chain. Consequently, using the actual finite sums from step 1.2, The last equality is linearity [F2]. Finite unions of the finite chains and of their finitely many compact primitives remain finite; thus the quotient equality can equivalently be witnessed by the corresponding finite sum of compact primitives under [F5].
If , step 2.1 gives ; the quotient definition [F5] means precisely for a compactly supported . Conversely, such a derivative has integral zero by [F2]. Thus the claimed iff and injectivity hold. For each real , the compactly supported form has integral by [F2]. This proves surjectivity, with explicit linear inverse ; step 2.1 proves that this inverse is independent of the temporary chosen normalized bump.
In dimension zero every singleton is open, so [F4] forces the nonempty connected manifold to be one point. Its integral is the orientation sign times the function value by [F2], hence is an isomorphism, and zero integral means the zero form, with zero negative-degree primitive by [F5]. At every primitive above is a compactly supported function as supplied by [F1], including at the ends of a coordinate interval. Empty support and zero coefficients contribute zero classes and can use zero primitives; nonempty is necessary since the empty manifold has zero cohomology and cannot map onto . All selections concern one base bump, one finite support cover, finitely many finite chains, and finitely many primitives for a given input. No countable partition, infinite family of primitives, path selections, or AC is used.
Depends on
- Compactly supported top cohomology propagates across overlapping oriented coordinate balls
- Integration descends to compactly supported top de Rham cohomology
- Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes
- Separation of a topological space, connected and disconnected spaces, clopen sets, and connected subsets
- Compactly supported de Rham cohomology
- A chart bump at a point with prescribed support
- The standard smooth step function
- A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- A continuous image of a compact space is compact; a continuous real-valued map on a nonempty compact space attains a maximum and a minimum; and a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism
- A closed subspace of a compact space is compact, and a finite union of compact subspaces is compact
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
78 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Robbin–Salamon, Introduction to Differential Topology (standard reference, not scraped)