How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compactly supported top cohomology propagates across overlapping oriented coordinate balls
Statement
Let be an oriented smooth manifold without boundary. A coordinate ball here is a domain with a chart onto an open Euclidean ball (or onto ), with the induced orientation. If are such domains with , and have supports compactly contained in respectively and satisfy , then in . Such normalized bump forms exist in every nonempty coordinate ball, and in every nonempty open overlap. Every compactly supported top form whose support is contained in one coordinate ball and whose integral is zero has a compactly supported primitive in that ball; extending the primitive by zero gives an ambient primitive. All integrals are the finite-localization integrals, and no choice axiom is used.
Facts & Assumptions
Zero-integral compactly supported top forms on Euclidean space have compactly supported primitives supplies a compact primitive on all of , with its dimension-zero clause.
Integration descends to compactly supported top de Rham cohomology fixes the integral and the quotient by compact primitives.
A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls gives , equal to one on a smaller closed ball and supported inside a larger one.
Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes gives signed chart agreement, locality and linearity of the integral without a global partition.
The de Rham complex and pullback extend to manifolds with boundary supplies pullback functoriality and its commutation with ; only boundaryless domains are used.
A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it permits finite-cover proofs for compact supports and their continuous images.
Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line makes the closed bounded Euclidean bump support compact.
Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in gives monotonicity, finite slice additivity and linearity for normalization.
Proof
Given: The oriented boundaryless manifold and coordinate balls in the statement. A support contained in a ball means a compact subset of that open domain, not a closed set meeting its boundary.
We can replace a ball chart by a chart onto all of . For , after translating and positively scaling its image to the unit ball, use If , then and , so ; substitution in the other direction gives . Both formulas are smooth, including at zero, with positive denominators. Moreover On its eigenvalue is and on the line through nonzero it is ; at zero it is the identity. Thus this change preserves orientation. A chart already onto needs no change. In dimension zero the ball and are both a point.
Let have compact support and zero integral. Write for the whole-space chart from step 1.1 and . Its support is contained in , which is compact: pulling an open cover back along the continuous chart and taking a finite subcover proves this by [F6]. By signed chart agreement and locality [F4], , so the last integral is zero regardless of the chart sign . Apply [F1] and obtain with compact support in . Its pullback has compact support in by the same continuous-image cover argument for , and by [F5]. This whole-space reparametrization is why the Euclidean primitive cannot escape the original chart.
Extend by zero outside . Its compact support is closed in the Hausdorff manifold: for a point outside , the Hausdorff separation neighbourhoods from each point of have a finite subfamily covering by [F6], and the intersection of the corresponding neighbourhoods of the outside point misses . Thus and form an open cover on which the two smooth formulas agree. The extension is smooth, compactly supported, and its derivative is on both opens, hence everywhere by [F5]. This proves the primitive assertion.
In a nonempty open set choose one point and one chart ball with a smaller concentric closed ball contained in its chart image. For use [F3] to put a nonnegative bump inside that chart image, with on a positive-radius ball; [F7] makes its support compact. The smooth chart form , pulled back and extended by zero as in step 3.1, has integral by [F4], where . To verify positivity without a global positivity theorem, enclose the support in a rectangle and choose a nondegenerate smaller rectangular cube inside the ball on which . Split the large rectangle finitely at the small cube's coordinate faces; [F8] gives , all other summands being nonnegative. The coefficient integrals exist by the chart-integral clause [F4]. Divide the form by . The resulting is supported compactly in and has integral one. For , take one point and the function of value there and zero elsewhere; its integral is , and its singleton support is compact and open.
Apply step 4.1 in to obtain . The differences and have integral zero by [F4], and their supports are compact subsets of and respectively: a finite union of compact sets is compact by taking and joining two finite subcovers in [F6]. Steps 2.1 and 3.1 give ambient compact primitives of these differences. Therefore and the difference primitive is compactly supported in the finite union of their supports. By [F2], the two ambient classes agree.
At , overlapping coordinate balls are the same singleton, and normalized forms there both have the value . A zero-integral form supported in a singleton is zero, so its primitive is the zero negative-degree element as in [F1]. At the reparametrization is a diffeomorphism of an interval onto the line and the primitive from [F1] is a compactly supported function; the zero extension in step 3.1 covers both interval ends. Empty support gives the zero primitive; an empty manifold has no pair of overlapping balls and imposes no normalization obligation. No positivity of the two given forms was needed, only their two integrals. The construction makes finitely many choices of charts, bumps and primitives for the stated pair; it makes no simultaneous selection over all points or all balls.
Depends on
- Zero-integral compactly supported top forms on Euclidean space have compactly supported primitives
- Integration descends to compactly supported top de Rham cohomology
- A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
- Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes
- The de Rham complex and pullback extend to manifolds with boundary
- A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in $\mathbb{R}^m$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
77 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Robbin–Salamon, Introduction to Differential Topology (standard reference, not scraped)