Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compactly supported top cohomology propagates across overlapping oriented coordinate balls

Statement

Let Mn be an oriented smooth manifold without boundary. A coordinate ball here is a domain with a chart onto an open Euclidean ball (or onto Rn), with the induced orientation. If U,V are such domains with UV, and μU,μVΩcn(M) have supports compactly contained in U,V respectively and satisfy MμU=MμV=1, then [μU]=[μV] in Hcn(M). Such normalized bump forms exist in every nonempty coordinate ball, and in every nonempty open overlap. Every compactly supported top form whose support is contained in one coordinate ball and whose integral is zero has a compactly supported primitive in that ball; extending the primitive by zero gives an ambient primitive. All integrals are the finite-localization integrals, and no choice axiom is used.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Zero-integral compactly supported top forms on Euclidean space have compactly supported primitives supplies a compact primitive on all of Rn, with its dimension-zero clause.

[F2]

Integration descends to compactly supported top de Rham cohomology fixes the integral and the quotient by compact primitives.

[F3]

A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls gives 0ρ1, equal to one on a smaller closed ball and supported inside a larger one.

[F4]

Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes gives signed chart agreement, locality and linearity of the integral without a global partition.

[F5]

The de Rham complex and pullback extend to manifolds with boundary supplies pullback functoriality and its commutation with d; only boundaryless domains are used.

[F8]

Proof

Given: The oriented boundaryless manifold and coordinate balls in the statement. A support contained in a ball means a compact subset of that open domain, not a closed set meeting its boundary.

1.1

We can replace a ball chart by a chart onto all of Rn. For n1, after translating and positively scaling its image to the unit ball, use T(x)=x1x2,S(y)=2y1+1+4y2. If q=1+4y2, then S(y)2=(q1)/(q+1)<1 and 1S(y)2=2/(q+1), so T(S(y))=y; substitution in the other direction gives S(T(x))=x. Both formulas are smooth, including at zero, with positive denominators. Moreover DTx(v)=v1x2+2xx,v(1x2)2. On x its eigenvalue is (1x2)1>0 and on the line through nonzero x it is (1+x2)/(1x2)2>0; at zero it is the identity. Thus this change preserves orientation. A chart already onto Rn needs no change. In dimension zero the ball and R0 are both a point.

givenconstruct
2.1

Let ζ have compact support KU and zero integral. Write ϕ:URn for the whole-space chart from step 1.1 and ζ~=(ϕ1)(ζU). Its support is contained in ϕ(K), which is compact: pulling an open cover back along the continuous chart and taking a finite subcover proves this by [F6]. By signed chart agreement and locality [F4], 0=Mζ=εϕRnζ~, so the last integral is zero regardless of the chart sign εϕ=±1. Apply [F1] and obtain dη~=ζ~ with compact support in Rn. Its pullback ηU=ϕη~ has compact support in U by the same continuous-image cover argument for ϕ1, and dηU=ζU by [F5]. This whole-space reparametrization is why the Euclidean primitive cannot escape the original chart.

F1F4F5F6step 1.1
3.1

Extend ηU by zero outside U. Its compact support LU is closed in the Hausdorff manifold: for a point outside L, the Hausdorff separation neighbourhoods from each point of L have a finite subfamily covering L by [F6], and the intersection of the corresponding neighbourhoods of the outside point misses L. Thus U and ML form an open cover on which the two smooth formulas agree. The extension is smooth, compactly supported, and its derivative is ζ on both opens, hence everywhere by [F5]. This proves the primitive assertion.

F5F6step 2.1
4.1

In a nonempty open set W choose one point and one chart ball with a smaller concentric closed ball contained in its chart image. For n1 use [F3] to put a nonnegative bump ρ inside that chart image, with ρ=1 on a positive-radius ball; [F7] makes its support compact. The smooth chart form ρdx1dxn, pulled back and extended by zero as in step 3.1, has integral εc by [F4], where c>0. To verify positivity without a global positivity theorem, enclose the support in a rectangle and choose a nondegenerate smaller rectangular cube inside the ball on which ρ=1. Split the large rectangle finitely at the small cube's coordinate faces; [F8] gives cvol(small cube)>0, all other summands being nonnegative. The coefficient integrals exist by the chart-integral clause [F4]. Divide the form by εc. The resulting ν is supported compactly in W and has integral one. For n=0, take one point pW and the function of value ε(p) there and zero elsewhere; its integral is ε(p)2=1, and its singleton support is compact and open.

F3F4F6F7F8step 3.1
5.1

Apply step 4.1 in UV to obtain ν. The differences μUν and μVν have integral zero by [F4], and their supports are compact subsets of U and V respectively: a finite union of compact sets is compact by taking and joining two finite subcovers in [F6]. Steps 2.1 and 3.1 give ambient compact primitives ηU,ηV of these differences. Therefore μUμV=d(ηUηV), and the difference primitive is compactly supported in the finite union of their supports. By [F2], the two ambient classes agree.

F2F4F6step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1
6.1

At n=0, overlapping coordinate balls are the same singleton, and normalized forms there both have the value ε(p). A zero-integral form supported in a singleton is zero, so its primitive is the zero negative-degree element as in [F1]. At n=1 the reparametrization is a diffeomorphism of an interval onto the line and the primitive from [F1] is a compactly supported function; the zero extension in step 3.1 covers both interval ends. Empty support gives the zero primitive; an empty manifold has no pair of overlapping balls and imposes no normalization obligation. No positivity of the two given forms was needed, only their two integrals. The construction makes finitely many choices of charts, bumps and primitives for the stated pair; it makes no simultaneous selection over all points or all balls.

F1F2F4step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

77 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources