Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Zero-integral compactly supported top forms on Euclidean space have compactly supported primitives

Statement

Let n1 and let ωΩcn(Rn) satisfy Rnω=0, with the standard orientation and the finite-localization integral. There exists ηΩcn1(Rn) with dη=ω. For n=0, the integral of a form on the single point is its value, so zero integral means ω=0 and the zero element of Ωc1=0 is the only primitive. The construction in positive dimension is by explicit finite-dimensional induction and requires no choice axiom.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Integration descends to compactly supported top de Rham cohomology fixes the choice-free boundaryless integral convention and compact-primitive interpretation.

[F2]

A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls gives a smooth 0ρ1 on R that is one on [1/2,1/2] and supported in (1,1).

[F3]

Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm gives linearity, monotonicity, interval-slice additivity and the absolute integral bound.

[F6]

Fubini over a bounded Jordan set when all but a content-zero family of sections are integrable identifies the compact rectangular integral with the iterated integral over its last coordinate.

[F7]

The de Rham complex and pullback extend to manifolds with boundary supplies the local coefficient differential formula and its signed wedge rule.

[F10]

Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous gives uniform continuity of each continuous derivative on a compact rectangle.

[F11]

Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm is Riemann integrable gives integrability of all smooth coefficient and derivative restrictions on these rectangles.

[F12]

Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes identifies the integral of a Euclidean chart-supported top form with its coefficient integral and gives locality.

[F13]

Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set gives the invertible affine interval substitution, with the absolute determinant and oriented-interval sign treated separately.

Proof

Given: ω=fdx1dxn of compact support and integral zero. We construct its compact primitive by induction on positive n, with the separate dimension-zero convention in the statement.

1.1

By [F9], the increasing open cubes have a finite subfamily covering suppf; take R>1 larger than the largest radius in such a finite family. Thus f vanishes outside a compact box strictly inside [R,R]n. By [F11] and [F12], the given integral is the ordinary integral of f on that rectangle, and all sections used below are integrable. If n=1, put a(x)=Rxf(t)dt using oriented interval integrals. The fundamental theorem gives a=f; repeated differentiation makes a smooth. It vanishes for xR, because the integrand is zero there, and for xR, because the total integral is zero. Hence η=a has compact support by [F8] and dη=fdx.

F5F7F8F9F11F12given
1.2

Fix one bump ρ from [F2]. By [F3], 1c:=11ρ(t)dt2, since ρ=1 on the middle interval of length one and is between zero and one elsewhere. Integrability follows from [F11]. Put b=ρ/c. It is smooth, has compact support in (1,1) and has integral one. This normalization uses one bump and an explicit positive integral bound, not a global positivity theorem or an infinite choice.

F2F3F11
2.1

Let n2, write x=(x1,,xn1), t=xn, and define f0(x)=RRf(x,s)ds,g(x,t)=f(x,t)f0(x)b(t),h(x,t)=Rtg(x,s)ds. The function f0 is smooth: repeatedly apply [F4] in each one parameter coordinate on smaller closed parameter rectangles. Each resulting derivative is the integral of the corresponding derivative of f. Joint continuity follows from [F10] and [F3], since the change of that integral is bounded by 2R times the uniform change of the integrand. Hence g is smooth. For joint smoothness of h, use h(x,t)=(t+R)01g(x,R+u(t+R))du. This formula is valid also at t=R and for t<R, by [F13] for tR (reverse the interval when t<R); at t=R both sides are zero. On any compact parameter neighbourhood the integrand and all parameter derivatives are continuous on its product with [0,1]; repeated [F4], [F10] and the same bound prove all joint derivatives continuous. Finally [F5] gives th=g.

F3F4F5F10F11F13step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

The function f0 vanishes outside [R,R]n1 and has compact support by [F8]. For every x, RRg(x,s)ds=f0(x)f0(x)RRb(s)ds=0, since R>1 and b is supported in (1,1). Therefore h vanishes when tR or tR. It also vanishes outside the stated x box, because both f and f0 vanish there. Thus h has closed support inside [R,R]n and is compactly supported by [F8]. By [F6] with all smooth sections and by [F12], Rn1f0dx=Rnfdx=0.

F3F6F8F11F12step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1
4.1

Apply the induction hypothesis in dimension n1 to the compactly supported top form f0dx1dxn1. It gives a compactly supported (n2)-form γ with dγ=f0dx1dxn1. Let π:RnRn1 be projection and put η=(1)n1hdx1dxn1+πγb(t)dt. For the first summand, every x derivative repeats a differential and vanishes; moving dt past n1 factors cancels (1)n1, so its derivative is gdx1dxn. For the second, [F7] gives πdγbdt, since d(bdt)=bdtdt=0. Its coefficient is f0b. Thus dη=(g+f0b)dx1dxn=ω.

F7step 2.1step 3.1
5.1

The first summand of η is supported in [R,R]n by step 3.1. The second is supported in suppγ×[1,1]. By [F9] the first factor is bounded; the product support is closed and bounded, so [F8] makes it compact. Their finite union is bounded, and the closed support of the sum lies in it, again compact by [F8]. This completes the induction with an actual compact primitive; projection pullback by itself was not claimed to preserve compact support.

F8F9step 3.1step 4.1
6.1

At n=0, [F1] and [F12] identify the integral on the standard oriented point with its scalar value; zero integral forces zero, the derivative of the zero negative-degree element. For zero input the construction gives f0=g=h=0 and one may take γ=0, hence η=0. The interval endpoints, zero fibres and vanishing support were checked in steps 1.1 and 3.1. The induction chooses one normalized bump and, at each of finitely many dimensions for a given input, one previously established primitive. There is no choice of primitives over an infinite family and no AC.

F1F2F8F12step 1.1step 1.2step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

121 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources