Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular-value formula for compact-support degree

Statement

Let F:Mn→Nn be a proper smooth map between nonempty connected oriented smooth manifolds without boundary. If y∈N is a regular value, then its fibre is finite and deg⁡(F)=∑p∈F−1(y)sgn⁡(dFp)∈Z. An empty fibre gives the empty sum zero. In dimension zero the signs compare the supplied determinant-line rays. The formula is choice-free and presupposes only a given regular value, not a theorem asserting their existence.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Degree is well defined and independent of the normalized top form computes degree on any integral-one compactly supported top form.

[F2]

Local orientation sign of a regular preimage defines the intrinsic sign, including the separate zero-dimensional convention.

[F3]

Regular and critical points and values says every preimage of a regular value has surjective differential, including the vacuous empty-fibre case.

[F4]

The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds gives a smooth inverse branch at an invertible differential. Its Euclidean proof uses only claim 2, the choice-free closed-subspace direction, of the currently published completeness theorem.

[F5]
[F8]

Compactly supported top cohomology propagates across overlapping oriented coordinate balls supplies an integral-one compact bump in any nonempty target open set.

[F9]

Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes gives locality, finite linearity and signed single-chart integrals without global partitions.

[F10]

Pointwise orientation sign of a local diffeomorphism makes the sign locally constant on an inverse branch.

Proof

Given: The map, manifolds and specified regular value. First assume n≥1; dimension zero will be treated directly.

1.1F3F4F5given

The singleton {y} is compact, so properness makes Ky=F−1(y) compact. At p∈Ky, [F3] makes dFp surjective, and equal finite dimensions make it invertible. By [F4] an inverse neighbourhood O of p meets Ky only at p. The set of all such neighbourhoods, over all p and all available branches, covers Ky without a choice of branch at each point. A finite subcover from [F5] shows that Ky is finite, since each member contains exactly one fibre point. Write its distinct points as p1,…,pm, with m=0 allowed.

2.1F2F4F10step 1.1

For the finitely many fibre points choose inverse branches and shrink their source domains to pairwise disjoint opens Oi. To do this, for every pair pi≠pj choose disjoint Hausdorff neighbourhoods, and intersect the finitely many neighbourhoods belonging to each point with its original inverse domain. Each restriction is still a diffeomorphism onto an open set Wi containing y. Shrink further so its orientation sign is the constant εi=sgn⁡(dFpi) using [F10]. All these domains can lie inside their original source coordinate charts. There are only finitely many restrictions and pairwise separations.

3.1F4F5F6F7step 1.1step 2.1

Choose a target chart about y and a closed coordinate ball K centred at its coordinate, contained in the chart image, and of positive radius. Its inverse image under the chart is compact by [F7] and the continuous-image criterion [F5]; denote this compact neighbourhood also by K. Properness makes F−1(K) compact. Put C=F−1(K)∖⋃i=1mOi. This is a closed subset of the compact Hausdorff space F−1(K), so compact by [F6]. Its continuous image F(C) is compact by [F5] and closed in N by [F6], and it misses y because all fibre points were in the Oi. Therefore int⁡K∩⋂i=1mWi∖F(C) is an open neighbourhood of y; for m=0 omit the intersection. Choose a smaller coordinate ball V about y inside it. For Ui=Oi∩F−1(V) we have diffeomorphisms F∣Ui:Ui→V, disjoint Ui, and F−1(V)=∐i=1mUi. Indeed any preimage of V lies in F−1(K) and cannot lie in C, so it lies in an Oi; the reverse containment is immediate. This compact-neighbourhood argument excludes additional branches approaching y from far away.

4.1F4F5F6F8step 3.1

By [F8] choose ν compactly supported in V with integral one. For each i define βi to equal (F∣Ui)∗(ν∣V) on Ui and zero elsewhere. Its support is contained in the image of supp⁡ν under the continuous inverse branch, hence is compact in Ui by [F5] and closed in M by [F6]. Thus extension by zero is smooth: the formulas on Ui and on the open complement of that compact set agree where both apply. The disjoint-union identity in step 3.1 gives the global finite equality F∗ν=∑iβi. Outside F−1(V) the pulled-back form is zero because ν vanishes outside V.

5.1F1F2F9F10step 2.1step 4.1

Choose a positive target chart ψ:V→B⊂Rn. On Ui the map ϕi=ψ∘F is a smooth coordinate chart, and its orientation sign is εi by [F2], [F10] and step 2.1. If ν has coefficient b in the ψ chart, then βi has exactly the same coefficient b in the ϕi chart, by the definition of pullback and ϕi=ψF. Both coefficients have compact support inside the common chart image B. Signed chart agreement and locality in [F9] therefore give ∫Mβi=εi∫Bb(x) dx=εi∫Nν=εi. Finite linearity [F9], step 4.1 and [F1] now give deg⁡(F)=∫MF∗ν=∑i=1mεi. This is an integer because it is a finite sum of +1 and −1. No unsigned chart sign or compact-support change-of-variables hypothesis is omitted: those comparisons are already part of the proved signed-chart integral [F9].

6.1F1F2F3F5F8F9step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1∎

If m=0 in positive dimension, step 3.1 gives F−1(V)=∅, so F∗ν=0 and step 5.1 gives degree zero. For n=0, connectedness and nonemptiness make both manifolds singletons: every singleton in a zero-manifold is open, so two distinct points would separate it by a singleton and its complement. Their unique map has one-point fibre and the derivative between zero spaces is invertible. A normalized function on N has value εN, and its pullback integrates on M to εMεN, precisely the sign [F2]. Thus the formula holds in dimension zero without using a positive-dimensional inverse function theorem. At n=1 the signs are those of the nonzero one-variable derivatives; compact supports stay inside the open branch intervals by step 4.1. Only the one fibre, finite branches and one bump are selected. The proof of [F4] uses its currently available choice-free completeness direction, and no AC, Sard theorem, or global partition is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources