How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Regular-value formula for compact-support degree
Statement
Let be a proper smooth map between nonempty connected oriented smooth manifolds without boundary. If is a regular value, then its fibre is finite and An empty fibre gives the empty sum zero. In dimension zero the signs compare the supplied determinant-line rays. The formula is choice-free and presupposes only a given regular value, not a theorem asserting their existence.
Facts & Assumptions
Degree is well defined and independent of the normalized top form computes degree on any integral-one compactly supported top form.
Local orientation sign of a regular preimage defines the intrinsic sign, including the separate zero-dimensional convention.
Regular and critical points and values says every preimage of a regular value has surjective differential, including the vacuous empty-fibre case.
The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds gives a smooth inverse branch at an invertible differential. Its Euclidean proof uses only claim 2, the choice-free closed-subspace direction, of the currently published completeness theorem.
A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it gives finite subcovers and compactness under continuous images by pulling a covering family back.
In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones gives closedness of compact images and compactness of closed subsets of compact Hausdorff spaces.
Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line gives a compact closed Euclidean ball inside a target chart.
Compactly supported top cohomology propagates across overlapping oriented coordinate balls supplies an integral-one compact bump in any nonempty target open set.
Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes gives locality, finite linearity and signed single-chart integrals without global partitions.
Pointwise orientation sign of a local diffeomorphism makes the sign locally constant on an inverse branch.
Proof
Given: The map, manifolds and specified regular value. First assume ; dimension zero will be treated directly.
The singleton is compact, so properness makes compact. At , [F3] makes surjective, and equal finite dimensions make it invertible. By [F4] an inverse neighbourhood of meets only at . The set of all such neighbourhoods, over all and all available branches, covers without a choice of branch at each point. A finite subcover from [F5] shows that is finite, since each member contains exactly one fibre point. Write its distinct points as , with allowed.
For the finitely many fibre points choose inverse branches and shrink their source domains to pairwise disjoint opens . To do this, for every pair choose disjoint Hausdorff neighbourhoods, and intersect the finitely many neighbourhoods belonging to each point with its original inverse domain. Each restriction is still a diffeomorphism onto an open set containing . Shrink further so its orientation sign is the constant using [F10]. All these domains can lie inside their original source coordinate charts. There are only finitely many restrictions and pairwise separations.
Choose a target chart about and a closed coordinate ball centred at its coordinate, contained in the chart image, and of positive radius. Its inverse image under the chart is compact by [F7] and the continuous-image criterion [F5]; denote this compact neighbourhood also by . Properness makes compact. Put This is a closed subset of the compact Hausdorff space , so compact by [F6]. Its continuous image is compact by [F5] and closed in by [F6], and it misses because all fibre points were in the . Therefore is an open neighbourhood of ; for omit the intersection. Choose a smaller coordinate ball about inside it. For we have diffeomorphisms , disjoint , and Indeed any preimage of lies in and cannot lie in , so it lies in an ; the reverse containment is immediate. This compact-neighbourhood argument excludes additional branches approaching from far away.
By [F8] choose compactly supported in with integral one. For each define to equal on and zero elsewhere. Its support is contained in the image of under the continuous inverse branch, hence is compact in by [F5] and closed in by [F6]. Thus extension by zero is smooth: the formulas on and on the open complement of that compact set agree where both apply. The disjoint-union identity in step 3.1 gives the global finite equality . Outside the pulled-back form is zero because vanishes outside .
Choose a positive target chart . On the map is a smooth coordinate chart, and its orientation sign is by [F2], [F10] and step 2.1. If has coefficient in the chart, then has exactly the same coefficient in the chart, by the definition of pullback and . Both coefficients have compact support inside the common chart image . Signed chart agreement and locality in [F9] therefore give Finite linearity [F9], step 4.1 and [F1] now give This is an integer because it is a finite sum of and . No unsigned chart sign or compact-support change-of-variables hypothesis is omitted: those comparisons are already part of the proved signed-chart integral [F9].
If in positive dimension, step 3.1 gives , so and step 5.1 gives degree zero. For , connectedness and nonemptiness make both manifolds singletons: every singleton in a zero-manifold is open, so two distinct points would separate it by a singleton and its complement. Their unique map has one-point fibre and the derivative between zero spaces is invertible. A normalized function on has value , and its pullback integrates on to , precisely the sign [F2]. Thus the formula holds in dimension zero without using a positive-dimensional inverse function theorem. At the signs are those of the nonzero one-variable derivatives; compact supports stay inside the open branch intervals by step 4.1. Only the one fibre, finite branches and one bump are selected. The proof of [F4] uses its currently available choice-free completeness direction, and no AC, Sard theorem, or global partition is used.
Depends on
- Degree is well defined and independent of the normalized top form
- Local orientation sign of a regular preimage
- Regular and critical points and values
- The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds
- A subspace is compact exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it
- In a Hausdorff space a point and a disjoint compact set, and two disjoint compact sets, have disjoint open neighbourhoods; hence every compact subset is closed, and in a compact Hausdorff space the compact subsets are exactly the closed ones
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
- Compactly supported top cohomology propagates across overlapping oriented coordinate balls
- Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes
- Pointwise orientation sign of a local diffeomorphism
Used by
- Degree is an integer and independent of the regular value Corollary
- A map with two preimages but degree zero Counterexample
- A displayed two-sheeted orientation-preserving covering has degree two Example
- Degree of z to the m on the circle from a regular value Example
- Degree is the unsigned number of points in a regular fibre False statement
- Regular-value formula for degree Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Robbin–Salamon, Introduction to Differential Topology (standard reference, not scraped)