Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regular-value formula for compact-support degree

Statement

Let F:MnNn be a proper smooth map between nonempty connected oriented smooth manifolds without boundary. If yN is a regular value, then its fibre is finite and deg(F)=pF1(y)sgn(dFp)Z. An empty fibre gives the empty sum zero. In dimension zero the signs compare the supplied determinant-line rays. The formula is choice-free and presupposes only a given regular value, not a theorem asserting their existence.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Degree is well defined and independent of the normalized top form computes degree on any integral-one compactly supported top form.

[F2]

Local orientation sign of a regular preimage defines the intrinsic sign, including the separate zero-dimensional convention.

[F3]

Regular and critical points and values says every preimage of a regular value has surjective differential, including the vacuous empty-fibre case.

[F4]

The smooth inverse function theorem on manifolds gives a smooth inverse branch at an invertible differential. Its Euclidean proof uses only claim 2, the choice-free closed-subspace direction, of the currently published completeness theorem.

[F5]
[F8]

Compactly supported top cohomology propagates across overlapping oriented coordinate balls supplies an integral-one compact bump in any nonempty target open set.

[F9]

Finite chart localization gives choice-free integration and compact Stokes gives locality, finite linearity and signed single-chart integrals without global partitions.

[F10]

Pointwise orientation sign of a local diffeomorphism makes the sign locally constant on an inverse branch.

Proof

Given: The map, manifolds and specified regular value. First assume n1; dimension zero will be treated directly.

1.1

The singleton {y} is compact, so properness makes Ky=F1(y) compact. At pKy, [F3] makes dFp surjective, and equal finite dimensions make it invertible. By [F4] an inverse neighbourhood O of p meets Ky only at p. The set of all such neighbourhoods, over all p and all available branches, covers Ky without a choice of branch at each point. A finite subcover from [F5] shows that Ky is finite, since each member contains exactly one fibre point. Write its distinct points as p1,,pm, with m=0 allowed.

F3F4F5given
2.1

For the finitely many fibre points choose inverse branches and shrink their source domains to pairwise disjoint opens Oi. To do this, for every pair pipj choose disjoint Hausdorff neighbourhoods, and intersect the finitely many neighbourhoods belonging to each point with its original inverse domain. Each restriction is still a diffeomorphism onto an open set Wi containing y. Shrink further so its orientation sign is the constant εi=sgn(dFpi) using [F10]. All these domains can lie inside their original source coordinate charts. There are only finitely many restrictions and pairwise separations.

F2F4F10step 1.1
3.1

Choose a target chart about y and a closed coordinate ball K centred at its coordinate, contained in the chart image, and of positive radius. Its inverse image under the chart is compact by [F7] and the continuous-image criterion [F5]; denote this compact neighbourhood also by K. Properness makes F1(K) compact. Put C=F1(K)i=1mOi. This is a closed subset of the compact Hausdorff space F1(K), so compact by [F6]. Its continuous image F(C) is compact by [F5] and closed in N by [F6], and it misses y because all fibre points were in the Oi. Therefore intKi=1mWiF(C) is an open neighbourhood of y; for m=0 omit the intersection. Choose a smaller coordinate ball V about y inside it. For Ui=OiF1(V) we have diffeomorphisms FUi:UiV, disjoint Ui, and F1(V)=i=1mUi. Indeed any preimage of V lies in F1(K) and cannot lie in C, so it lies in an Oi; the reverse containment is immediate. This compact-neighbourhood argument excludes additional branches approaching y from far away.

F4F5F6F7step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

By [F8] choose ν compactly supported in V with integral one. For each i define βi to equal (FUi)(νV) on Ui and zero elsewhere. Its support is contained in the image of suppν under the continuous inverse branch, hence is compact in Ui by [F5] and closed in M by [F6]. Thus extension by zero is smooth: the formulas on Ui and on the open complement of that compact set agree where both apply. The disjoint-union identity in step 3.1 gives the global finite equality Fν=iβi. Outside F1(V) the pulled-back form is zero because ν vanishes outside V.

F4F5F6F8step 3.1
5.1

Choose a positive target chart ψ:VBRn. On Ui the map ϕi=ψF is a smooth coordinate chart, and its orientation sign is εi by [F2], [F10] and step 2.1. If ν has coefficient b in the ψ chart, then βi has exactly the same coefficient b in the ϕi chart, by the definition of pullback and ϕi=ψF. Both coefficients have compact support inside the common chart image B. Signed chart agreement and locality in [F9] therefore give Mβi=εiBb(x)dx=εiNν=εi. Finite linearity [F9], step 4.1 and [F1] now give deg(F)=MFν=i=1mεi. This is an integer because it is a finite sum of +1 and 1. No unsigned chart sign or compact-support change-of-variables hypothesis is omitted: those comparisons are already part of the proved signed-chart integral [F9].

F1F2F9F10step 2.1step 4.1
6.1

If m=0 in positive dimension, step 3.1 gives F1(V)=, so Fν=0 and step 5.1 gives degree zero. For n=0, connectedness and nonemptiness make both manifolds singletons: every singleton in a zero-manifold is open, so two distinct points would separate it by a singleton and its complement. Their unique map has one-point fibre and the derivative between zero spaces is invertible. A normalized function on N has value εN, and its pullback integrates on M to εMεN, precisely the sign [F2]. Thus the formula holds in dimension zero without using a positive-dimensional inverse function theorem. At n=1 the signs are those of the nonzero one-variable derivatives; compact supports stay inside the open branch intervals by step 4.1. Only the one fibre, finite branches and one bump are selected. The proof of [F4] uses its currently available choice-free completeness direction, and no AC, Sard theorem, or global partition is used.

F1F2F3F5F8F9step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources