Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A hypersurface jump is not W1,p

Statement refuted

Assume Countable Choice. Let Q=(−1,1)n with n≥2 and let u=1{xn>0} on Q, so that u(x)=H(xn) with H=1(0,1) on (−1,1). Then u∈Lp(Q) for every 1≤p≤∞, but its distributional normal derivative is surface integration against the coordinate hyperplane {xn=0}, ⟨∂nTu,φ⟩=∫(−1,1)n−1φ(y,0) dy(φ∈Cc∞(Q)). and this distribution has no representative in Lloc1(Q). Consequently u∉W1,p(Q) for every 1≤p≤∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, n≥2, Q=(−1,1)n, Y=(−1,1)n−1, I=(−1,1), and u=1{xn>0} on Q.

[F1]

Countable Choice is the assertion that every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F2]

For a measurable set A, the indicator 1A is measurable (An indicator function is measurable exactly when its set is measurable).

[F3]

Under Countable Choice every box in Rn is Lebesgue measurable with measure the product of its side lengths, so bounded boxes have finite measure (A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included).

[F4]

Under Countable Choice, every compact subset of Rn has finite Lebesgue measure (Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure).

[F5]

Under Countable Choice, Lebesgue measure on Rm+1 is the completion of the product of the factor Lebesgue measures (The Euclidean Lebesgue measure is the completion of the product of the factor Lebesgue measures).

[F6]

For a completed product of sigma-finite measures, sections of an integrable function are integrable outside null sets and the iterated integrals agree with the product integral (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability).

[F7]

For complex C1 functions on [a,b], Countable Choice gives ∫abu′=u(b)−u(a) (Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines).

[F8]

A weak α-derivative v satisfies ∫Ωu Dαφ=(−1)∣α∣∫Ωvφ for every test φ, and membership in Wk,p requires such an Lp class with a locally integrable representative for every ∣α∣≤k (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function, Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[F9]

There is a smooth function ψ:Rn−1→[0,1], equal to 1 on a neighbourhood of the origin and compactly supported in Y; its integral is a positive finite constant (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls).

[F11]

If f∈L1(μ), then for every ε>0 there is δ>0 such that μ(A)<δ implies ∫A∣f∣ dμ<ε (Absolute continuity of the integral).

Counterexample

technique · compute the normal distributional derivative by Fubini and expose the one-dimensional jump obstruction with shrinking slab tests
1.1F1F2F3F4given

The set Q+={xn>0}∩Q=Y×(0,1) is a box, so [F3] makes it measurable with finite measure 2n−1, and [F2] makes u=1Q+ measurable. For finite p, ∫Q∣u∣p=λn(Q+)=2n−1<∞; for p=∞, ∣u∣≤1, so u∈Lp(Q) for every 1≤p≤∞, and in particular u∈Lloc1(Q) by [F4].

1.2F5F6F7given

Let φ∈Cc∞(Q). Since supp⁡φ is compact in Q, [F5] and [F6] apply to the integrable function u ∂nφ and reduce the integral to the iterated integral over Y×I. For fixed y∈Y the function t↦φ(y,t) is C1 on the interval [0,1] and vanishes at t=1, so [F7] gives ∫01∂tφ(y,t) dt=φ(y,1)−φ(y,0)=−φ(y,0). Hence ∫Qu ∂nφ dx=∫Y(∫01∂tφ(y,t) dt)dy=−∫Yφ(y,0) dy, and by the distributional sign convention the normal derivative of Tu is the surface functional ⟨∂nTu,φ⟩=−∫Qu ∂nφ dx=∫Yφ(y,0) dy.

2.1F8step 1.2

Suppose v∈Lloc1(Q) represented that normal derivative, that is ∫Qu ∂nφ dx=−∫Qvφ dx for every test φ by [F8]. Combined with step 1.2 this means ∫Qvφ dx=∫Yφ(y,0) dyfor every φ∈Cc∞(Q).

3.1F3F4F10F11step 2.1choose

Fix ψ as in [F9] and let c=∫Yψ>0. Let η:R→[0,1] be smooth, equal to 1 on [−1/2,1/2] and supported in I; for 0<δ<1/2 put ηδ(t)=η(t/δ) and φδ=ψ⊗ηδ, which is a test by [F10]. Step 2.1 evaluated at φδ gives ∫Qv φδ dx=∫Yψ(y)ηδ(0) dy=c for every δ. On the other hand vψ∈L1(K) for the compact product K=supp⁡ψ×[−1/2,1/2] by [F4], and the supports of the φδ are contained in the slabs Aδ={−δ<t<δ}∩K with λn(Aδ)≤2δ⋅λn−1(supp⁡ψ)→0 by [F3]. Since ∣φδ∣≤1, [F11] applied to vψ on K yields ∣∫Qv φδ dx∣≤∫Aδ∣vψ∣ dx⟶0, contradicting the constant value c>0. Hence no locally integrable v represents ∂nTu.

4.1F1F3F5F6F7F8step 1.1step 3.1

It remains to note the tangential directions. For j<n and any test φ, the same Fubini reduction gives ∫Qu ∂jφ=∫IH(t)(∫Y∂jφ(y,t) dy)dt=0, because [F7] applied along the j-th coordinate of the compactly supported function y↦φ(y,t) makes the inner integral vanish; so the tangential distributional derivatives are represented by the zero function. That does not remove the obstruction of step 3.1: by [F8] membership of u in W1,p(Q) for any 1≤p≤∞ would require an Lp class with a locally integrable representative for the multi-index α=en, which step 3.1 rules out. Therefore u∉W1,p(Q) for every 1≤p≤∞, including both endpoints, although u∈Lp(Q) for every p by step 1.1. The assumption used is Countable Choice [F1], spent through the box-measure, product-completion, Fubini and one-dimensional fundamental-theorem interfaces; no full Axiom of Choice occurs. □

Sources

  • Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces, Chapters 1–2: the indicator of a half-space is the standard example of an Lp function whose normal distributional derivative is a surface measure and which therefore lies in no W1,p.
  • John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations, Chapter 3: the one-dimensional step calculation and the surface-functional description of the jump derivative.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

84 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources