Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A step has no locally integrable weak derivative

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let I=(−1,1), let K∈{R,C}, and define H:I→K by H=1(0,1). Then H∈Lp(I;K) for every 1≤p≤∞. Its regular distribution satisfies ∂TH=δ0in D′(I), but no v∈Lloc1(I;K) represents this derivative. Consequently H∉W1,p(I;K) for every 1≤p≤∞.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, I=(−1,1), E=(0,1), the indicator H=1E, and K∈{R,C}.

[F1]

Countable Choice, or ACω, says that every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω))

[F2]

The indicator of a measurable set is measurable. (An indicator function is measurable exactly when its set is measurable)

[F3]

Under Countable Choice, intervals in R are measurable with their length as measure, including open and closed endpoint conventions; degenerate intervals have measure zero. (A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included)

[F4]

Under Countable Choice, every compact subset of R is measurable and has finite Lebesgue measure. (Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure)

[F5]

The complex Lp conventions use ∫∣f∣p for finite p and the essential bound for p=∞. (Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions)

[F6]

The simple integral of 1E is λ(E), and the nonnegative Lebesgue integral agrees with that simple integral. (The integral of a nonnegative simple function, The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions)

[F7]

If f≤g are nonnegative measurable functions, then ∫f≤∫g. (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral)

[F8]

For a measurable set A, the integral over A is the integral of the integrand multiplied by 1A. (Integral over a measurable subset)

[F9]

A complex measurable function is integrable when its modulus is integrable, and its integral is defined componentwise. (Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals)

[F10]

A test function in D(I)=Cc∞(I;C) is smooth and has compact support in I; its zero extension is smooth on R. (Test function space d of an open set)

[F11]

The regular distribution of a locally integrable function u is Tu(φ)=∫Iuφ. (Locally integrable functions as regular distributions)

[F12]

The distributional derivative obeys ⟨∂T,φ⟩=−⟨T,φ′⟩. (Distributional derivative)

[F13]

The Dirac distribution is δ0(φ)=φ(0). (Dirac delta and its derivatives)

[F14]

A locally integrable weak derivative v satisfies ∫IHφ′=−∫Ivφ for every φ∈Cc∞(I). (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function)

[F15]

Membership in W1,p requires an Lp class with a locally integrable representative satisfying the first-order weak test identity. (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)

[F16]

If f∈L1(μ), then for every ε>0 there is δ>0 such that μ(A)<δ implies ∫A∣f∣ dμ<ε. (Absolute continuity of the integral)

[F17]

There is a smooth η:R→[0,1] equal to 1 on [−1/2,1/2] with support contained in (−1,1). (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls)

[F19]

For complex C1 functions on [a,b], Countable Choice gives the Lebesgue fundamental theorem ∫abu′=u(b)−u(a). (Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines)

[F20]

For an integrable complex function f, ∣∫f∣≤∫∣f∣. (The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus)

[F21]

A nonnegative integral over a measurable null set is zero. (A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes)

[F22]

Local integrability means finite integral of ∣f∣ on each compact set. (Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions)

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F11F22

By [F3], λ(E)=1, λ(I)=2, and each compact K⊂I has finite measure; hence [F2] makes H measurable. For finite p, ∣H∣p=1E, so [F6] gives ∫I∣H∣p dx=λ(E)=1; for p=∞, ∣H∣≤1 gives a finite essential bound by [F5]. Also ∫K∣H∣ dx≤∫K1 dx=λ(K)<∞ by [F4, F7, F8], so H∈Lloc1(I) by [F22] and its regular distribution is defined by [F11].

2.1F3F8F9F10F11F12F13F19F20F21step 1.1

For φ∈D(I), [F8, F9, F10, F11, F12] and step 1.1 give ⟨∂TH,φ⟩=−∫IHφ′ dx=−∫I1(0,1)φ′ dx. The indicator convention [F8] applies to nonnegative integrands; for signed or complex φ′, apply it to the positive and negative parts of each real component and subtract, using the componentwise integral in [F9]. The endpoints {0,1} are measurable and null by [F3]; [F21] gives zero integral of ∣φ′∣ on them, so the difference between the 1(0,1)φ′ and 1[0,1]φ′ integrals is zero by [F20]. Let φ~ be the smooth zero extension from [F10]; the interval FTC [F19] gives −∫[0,1]φ~′ dx=−(φ~(1)−φ~(0))=φ(0)=δ0(φ) by [F13]. Thus ∂TH=δ0 in D′(I).

3.1F3F7F8F10F14F16F17F18F20F22step 2.1choose

Suppose v∈Lloc1(I;K) were a weak derivative. Then [F14] and step 2.1 give ∫Ivφ dx=φ(0) for every test φ. Choose one η as in [F17]. For 0<ϵ<1/2, set φϵ(x)=η(x/ϵ); [F18] makes it smooth and its support is compactly contained in (−ϵ,ϵ)⊂I, so it is a test by [F10], with φϵ(0)=1 and ∣φϵ∣≤1. For K=[−1/2,1/2], [F22] gives ∫K∣v∣<∞. The measurable sets Aϵ=[−ϵ,ϵ]⊂K have λ(Aϵ)=2ϵ→0 by [F3]; [F16] on the restricted measure space K gives ∫Aϵ∣v∣ dx→0. But [F20], [F7], and the support and bound of φϵ give 1=∣∫Ivφϵ dx∣≤∫I∣vφϵ∣ dx≤∫Aϵ∣v∣ dx→0, a contradiction. Hence no locally integrable function represents ∂TH.

4.1F1F3F4F15F19step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

By [F15], membership of H in any W1,p(I;K) would require a locally integrable representative of its weak first derivative, which step 3.1 rules out for every 1≤p≤∞, including both endpoints. The assumption is exactly Countable Choice ACω by [F1]; it is used through the interval-measure and compact-measure facts [F3, F4] and the interval FTC [F19]. The regular-distribution injection is not used, and no full Axiom of Choice or sequence of selections occurs.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

98 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources