How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A step has no locally integrable weak derivative
Statement
Assume Countable Choice. Let , let , and define by . Then for every . Its regular distribution satisfies but no represents this derivative. Consequently for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , the indicator , and .
Countable Choice, or , says that every sequence of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Countable Choice ())
The indicator of a measurable set is measurable. (An indicator function is measurable exactly when its set is measurable)
Under Countable Choice, intervals in are measurable with their length as measure, including open and closed endpoint conventions; degenerate intervals have measure zero. (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included)
Under Countable Choice, every compact subset of is measurable and has finite Lebesgue measure. (Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of has finite outer measure)
The complex conventions use for finite and the essential bound for . (Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions)
The simple integral of is , and the nonnegative Lebesgue integral agrees with that simple integral. (The integral of a nonnegative simple function, The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions)
If are nonnegative measurable functions, then . (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral)
For a measurable set , the integral over is the integral of the integrand multiplied by . (Integral over a measurable subset)
A complex measurable function is integrable when its modulus is integrable, and its integral is defined componentwise. (Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals)
A test function in is smooth and has compact support in ; its zero extension is smooth on . (Test function space d of an open set)
The regular distribution of a locally integrable function is . (Locally integrable functions as regular distributions)
The distributional derivative obeys . (Distributional derivative)
The Dirac distribution is . (Dirac delta and its derivatives)
A locally integrable weak derivative satisfies for every . (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function)
Membership in requires an class with a locally integrable representative satisfying the first-order weak test identity. (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms)
If , then for every there is such that implies . (Absolute continuity of the integral)
There is a smooth equal to on with support contained in . (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls)
Composing smooth functions with the affine map preserves smoothness by the chain rule. (The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with )
For complex functions on , Countable Choice gives the Lebesgue fundamental theorem . (Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines)
For an integrable complex function , . (The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus)
A nonnegative integral over a measurable null set is zero. (A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes)
Local integrability means finite integral of on each compact set. (Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions)
Counterexample
By [F3], , , and each compact has finite measure; hence [F2] makes measurable. For finite , , so [F6] gives ; for , gives a finite essential bound by [F5]. Also by [F4, F7, F8], so by [F22] and its regular distribution is defined by [F11].
For , [F8, F9, F10, F11, F12] and step 1.1 give . The indicator convention [F8] applies to nonnegative integrands; for signed or complex , apply it to the positive and negative parts of each real component and subtract, using the componentwise integral in [F9]. The endpoints are measurable and null by [F3]; [F21] gives zero integral of on them, so the difference between the and integrals is zero by [F20]. Let be the smooth zero extension from [F10]; the interval FTC [F19] gives by [F13]. Thus in .
Suppose were a weak derivative. Then [F14] and step 2.1 give for every test . Choose one as in [F17]. For , set ; [F18] makes it smooth and its support is compactly contained in , so it is a test by [F10], with and . For , [F22] gives . The measurable sets have by [F3]; [F16] on the restricted measure space gives . But [F20], [F7], and the support and bound of give , a contradiction. Hence no locally integrable function represents .
By [F15], membership of in any would require a locally integrable representative of its weak first derivative, which step 3.1 rules out for every , including both endpoints. The assumption is exactly Countable Choice by [F1]; it is used through the interval-measure and compact-measure facts [F3, F4] and the interval FTC [F19]. The regular-distribution injection is not used, and no full Axiom of Choice or sequence of selections occurs.
Depends on
- Weak derivative of a locally integrable function
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- Dirac delta and its derivatives
- Absolute continuity of the integral
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Locally integrable functions as regular distributions
- Distributional derivative
- Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
- An indicator function is measurable exactly when its set is measurable
- The integral of a nonnegative simple function
- The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ has finite outer measure
- Integral over a measurable subset
- Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals
- Test function space d of an open set
- A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
- The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if $g$ is differentiable at $c$ and $f$ is differentiable at $g(c)$, then $f \circ g$ is differentiable at $c$ with $(f \circ g)'(c) = f'(g(c))\,g'(c)$
- Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines
- The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus
- A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
98 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (2014), Chapter 3 §3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)