How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Peak functions at strongly pseudoconvex boundary points, by a dbar correction
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). Let , let be a bounded open set and let . Suppose that there are a neighbourhood of and a function such that and such that is strictly plurisubharmonic on some neighbourhood of (The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity).
-
Then there is a function , holomorphic on a neighbourhood of , with
-
(Strongly pseudoconvex boundaries.) The same conclusion holds when is a bounded domain whose boundary is of class and strongly pseudoconvex at every point, that is: for every there are a neighbourhood of and with , and for every nonzero complex tangent vector at (Levi pseudoconvex domains); namely, there is then holomorphic on a neighbourhood of with and on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC; ; a bounded open ; ; and the smooth negative-set defining data in branch 1. Branch 2 is reduced to this data in step 7.1. Coordinates are canonical .
Real second-order Taylor expansion, rewritten using Wirtinger derivatives, separates the real part of a holomorphic linear/quadratic polynomial from the Hermitian Levi quadratic form. Strict psh means the latter is positive definite (Second-order Taylor expansion , Wirtinger operators in , The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity).
The negative set of smooth data strictly psh near its boundary has arbitrarily small outer neighborhoods consisting of finitely many bounded smooth strongly pseudoconvex domains, each with a continuous psh exhaustion; critical boundary points are allowed (Positive smooth collars for strictly plurisubharmonic negative sets).
Smooth strongly pseudoconvex boundary data admit a global smooth defining function strictly psh near the boundary (Smooth global defining functions for strongly pseudoconvex boundaries), for the boundary convention of Levi pseudoconvex domains.
Under AC and countable choice a continuous psh exhaustion has a smooth strictly psh exhaustive majorant (Smooth strict plurisubharmonic regularization of a psh exhaustion). On a bounded domain a smooth psh exhaustion implies Hartogs pseudoconvexity with the equal-radius polydisc convention (A smooth psh exhaustion gives Hartogs pseudoconvexity on bounded domains).
On a Hartogs pseudoconvex domain, with smooth strictly psh weight , every smooth closed -form of finite weighted energy has a smooth scalar solution of (Hörmander's weighted L2 existence theorem for the dbar equation, Statement, smooth-data branch).
There is a smooth cutoff in , equal to on a smaller closed ball and supported in a larger open ball (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls).
Smooth forms satisfy (The d, partial and dbar identities). A smooth function with all derivatives zero is holomorphic (For functions, holomorphy, complex linearity of the real derivative, and the Cauchy–Riemann system agree); polynomial algebra and reciprocals of nonzero holomorphic functions are holomorphic (Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic).
The complex exponential satisfies (, , and ).
AC implies countable choice (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (), AC implies DC implies countable choice).
Choice use. AC is inherited by the collar, regularization and Hörmander interfaces; it supplies countable choice for [F4]. Only finitely many outer components and corrections are selected. The polynomial, cutoff, corrected quotient and exponential below are explicit once those data are fixed.
Proof
Put and define the holomorphic Levi polynomial By [F1], The Hermitian form is bounded below by for some . Choose with and remainder at most . Since on , Thus and is zero-free on this part of . The argument includes : the linear term then vanishes and the same quadratic estimate applies.
Fix . By [F6] take equal to on a neighborhood of . Its derivative support lies in the compact annulus . The compact set is disjoint from by step 1.1. Apply [F2] with the prescribed open neighborhood to get , with . Hence is bounded away from zero on when this set is nonempty. On define in the annulus and zero outside it. More precisely, use the quotient on the open zero-free neighborhood of and zero wherever is locally constant. These definitions agree, so is smooth, bounded on , and by [F7]. It vanishes near and satisfies everywhere on . No sublevel of is asserted to lie in a ball.
Each has a continuous psh exhaustion by [F2]. Using [F9], apply [F4] to regularize it and then conclude that is Hartogs pseudoconvex in the actual polydisc-radius convention. Take : its Levi eigenvalues are all . The energy is finite because is bounded and is bounded. Thus [F5] gives a smooth scalar on with . Define on each of the finitely many disjoint components. Then solves , is holomorphic near , and is bounded on the compact set . The data need not have compact support in each : boundedness on the bounded domain proves the required finite energy.
Choose and put on . Since , so is holomorphic by [F7]. Where in a neighborhood, is holomorphic and the expression is holomorphic wherever . Where , the expression is holomorphic. The two expressions agree on their common domain where is locally zero: and there forces . They therefore glue on the union of these open sets.
This union contains . At a point of outside , is locally zero and . At a point other than , step 1.1 gives and , whence Thus . At one has , so is holomorphic on a full neighborhood of and . Every point of has : where this follows from , and where from the same displayed inequality and . Therefore is holomorphic on an open neighborhood of , vanishes at , and has positive real part on .
Set on this neighborhood. It is holomorphic, , and for every . This proves branch 1 under exactly its stated smooth negative-set hypotheses, including critical boundary points and disconnected .
Under the smooth strongly pseudoconvex boundary hypotheses of branch 2, [F3] constructs a defining function on a neighborhood of , strictly psh near . Its proof glues the given smooth local defining functions with a finite partition near the compact boundary, extends with a sign-constant interior/exterior term, and applies after a tangent/normal Levi estimate. Thus it supplies the smooth data required by branch 1 without upgrading a merely function. Step 6.1 now gives the same for branch 2.
Both branches of the Statement hold with all their original hypotheses, under the ambient AC.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- AC implies DC implies countable choice
- The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity
- Second-order Taylor expansion $f(a+h)=f(a)+\nabla f(a)\cdot h+\tfrac12h^TH_f(a)h+o(\|h\|^2)$
- Wirtinger operators in $\mathbb{C}^m$
- Positive smooth collars for strictly plurisubharmonic negative sets
- Smooth global defining functions for strongly pseudoconvex boundaries
- Smooth strict plurisubharmonic regularization of a psh exhaustion
- A smooth psh exhaustion gives Hartogs pseudoconvexity on bounded domains
- Hörmander's weighted L2 existence theorem for the dbar equation
- A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls
- The d, partial and dbar identities
- For $C^1$ functions, holomorphy, complex linearity of the real derivative, and the Cauchy–Riemann system agree
- Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic
- $\exp(x+iy)=e^x(\cos y+i\sin y)$, $|\exp(x+iy)|=e^x$, and $e^{i\pi}+1=0$
- Levi pseudoconvex domains
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
98 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Harold P. Boas, Lecture Notes on Several Complex Variables (standard reference, not scraped)
- Mohammad Jabbari, Several Complex Variables course notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jean-Pierre Demailly, Complex Analytic and Differential Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)