Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Peak functions at strongly pseudoconvex boundary points, by a dbar correction

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (AC). Let n≥1, let D⊆Cn be a bounded open set and let p∈∂D. Suppose that there are a neighbourhood U of D‾ and a function ρ∈C∞(U,R) such that ρ(p)=0,D={z∈U:ρ(z)<0}, and such that ρ is strictly plurisubharmonic on some neighbourhood of ∂D (The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity).

  1. Then there is a function h, holomorphic on a neighbourhood of D‾, with h(p)=1and∣h(z)∣<1for every z∈D∖{p}.

  2. (Strongly pseudoconvex boundaries.) The same conclusion holds when D is a bounded domain whose boundary is of class C∞ and strongly pseudoconvex at every point, that is: for every q∈∂D there are a neighbourhood V of q and ρ∈C∞(V,R) with D∩V={ρ<0}, dρ(q)≠0 and Lρ(q;v)>0 for every nonzero complex tangent vector v at q (Levi pseudoconvex domains); namely, there is then h holomorphic on a neighbourhood of D‾ with h(p)=1 and ∣h∣<1 on D∖{p}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; n≥1; a bounded open D⊂Cn; p∈∂D; and the smooth negative-set defining data (U,ρ) in branch 1. Branch 2 is reduced to this data in step 7.1. Coordinates are canonical z0,…,zn−1.

[F1]

Real second-order Taylor expansion, rewritten using Wirtinger derivatives, separates the real part of a holomorphic linear/quadratic polynomial from the Hermitian Levi quadratic form. Strict psh means the latter is positive definite (Second-order Taylor expansion f(a+h)=f(a)+∇f(a)⋅h+12hTHf(a)h+o(∥h∥2), Wirtinger operators in Cm, The Levi form and strict plurisubharmonicity).

[F2]

The negative set of smooth data strictly psh near its boundary has arbitrarily small outer neighborhoods consisting of finitely many bounded smooth strongly pseudoconvex domains, each with a continuous psh exhaustion; critical boundary points are allowed (Positive smooth collars for strictly plurisubharmonic negative sets).

[F3]

Smooth strongly pseudoconvex boundary data admit a global smooth defining function strictly psh near the boundary (Smooth global defining functions for strongly pseudoconvex boundaries), for the boundary convention of Levi pseudoconvex domains.

[F4]

Under AC and countable choice a continuous psh exhaustion has a smooth strictly psh exhaustive majorant (Smooth strict plurisubharmonic regularization of a psh exhaustion). On a bounded domain a smooth psh exhaustion implies Hartogs pseudoconvexity with the equal-radius polydisc convention (A smooth psh exhaustion gives Hartogs pseudoconvexity on bounded domains).

[F5]

On a Hartogs pseudoconvex domain, with smooth strictly psh weight φ, every smooth closed (0,1)-form of finite weighted energy has a smooth scalar solution v of ∂ˉv=α (Hörmander's weighted L2 existence theorem for the dbar equation, Statement, smooth-data branch).

[F6]

There is a smooth cutoff in [0,1], equal to 1 on a smaller closed ball and supported in a larger open ball (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls).

[F7]

Smooth forms satisfy ∂ˉ2=0 (The d, partial and dbar identities). A smooth function with all zˉ derivatives zero is holomorphic (For C1 functions, holomorphy, complex linearity of the real derivative, and the Cauchy–Riemann system agree); polynomial algebra and reciprocals of nonzero holomorphic functions are holomorphic (Sums, products and nonvanishing quotients of holomorphic functions are holomorphic).

Choice use. AC is inherited by the collar, regularization and Hörmander interfaces; it supplies countable choice for [F4]. Only finitely many outer components and corrections are selected. The polynomial, cutoff, corrected quotient and exponential below are explicit once those data are fixed.

Proof

1.1F1F7givenconstruct

Put w=z−p and define the holomorphic Levi polynomial f(z)=2∑j<nρzj(p)wj+∑j,k<nρzjzk(p)wjwk. By [F1], ρ(p+w)=Re⁡f(p+w)+∑j,k<nρzjzˉk(p)wjwˉk+o(∣w∣2). The Hermitian form is bounded below by λ∣w∣2 for some λ>0. Choose δ>0 with B(p,δ)⊂U and remainder at most λ∣w∣2/2. Since ρ≤0 on D‾, Re⁡f(z)≤−λ2∣z−p∣2(z∈D‾∩B(p,δ)). Thus f(p)=0 and f is zero-free on this part of D‾∖{p}. The argument includes dρ(p)=0: the linear term then vanishes and the same quadratic estimate applies.

2.1F2F6F7step 1.1

Fix 0<r<R<δ. By [F6] take χ∈Cc∞(B(p,R),[0,1]) equal to 1 on a neighborhood of B‾(p,r). Its derivative support lies in the compact annulus A={r≤∣z−p∣≤R}. The compact set Z=A∩{f=0} is disjoint from D‾ by step 1.1. Apply [F2] with the prescribed open neighborhood O=U∖Z to get G=⋃i=1NGi⊃D‾, with G‾⊂O. Hence f is bounded away from zero on A∩G‾ when this set is nonempty. On G define α=(∂ˉχ)/f in the annulus and zero outside it. More precisely, use the quotient on the open zero-free neighborhood of supp⁡(∂ˉχ)∩G‾ and zero wherever χ is locally constant. These definitions agree, so α is smooth, bounded on G, and ∂ˉα=0 by [F7]. It vanishes near p and satisfies fα=∂ˉχ everywhere on G. No sublevel of ∣f∣ is asserted to lie in a ball.

3.1F2F4F5F7F9step 2.1

Each Gi has a continuous psh exhaustion by [F2]. Using [F9], apply [F4] to regularize it and then conclude that Gi is Hartogs pseudoconvex in the actual polydisc-radius convention. Take φ(z)=∣z∣2: its Levi eigenvalues are all 1. The energy ∫Gi∣α∣2e−∣z∣2 is finite because Gi is bounded and α is bounded. Thus [F5] gives a smooth scalar vi on Gi with ∂ˉvi=α. Define v=vi on each of the finitely many disjoint components. Then v∈C∞(G) solves ∂ˉv=α, is holomorphic near p, and is bounded on the compact set D‾⊂G. The data need not have compact support in each Gi: boundedness on the bounded domain proves the required finite energy.

4.1F7step 2.1step 3.1construct

Choose c>1+max⁡D‾∣v∣ and put Q=(c+v)f−χ on G. Since fα=∂ˉχ, ∂ˉQ=f∂ˉv−∂ˉχ=0, so Q is holomorphic by [F7]. Where χ=0 in a neighborhood, v is holomorphic and the expression g=1/(c+v) is holomorphic wherever c+v≠0. Where Q≠0, the expression g=f/Q is holomorphic. The two expressions agree on their common domain where χ is locally zero: Q=(c+v)f and Q≠0 there forces f≠0. They therefore glue on the union of these open sets.

5.1F7step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra

This union contains D‾. At a point of D‾ outside supp⁡χ, χ is locally zero and Re⁡(c+v)>0. At a point z∈D‾∩supp⁡χ other than p, step 1.1 gives f(z)≠0 and Re⁡(1/f(z))<0, whence Re⁡(c+v(z)−χ(z)f(z))≥c−∣v(z)∣>0. Thus Q(z)≠0. At p one has Q(p)=−1, so f/Q is holomorphic on a full neighborhood of p and g(p)=0. Every point of D has Re⁡g>0: where χ=0 this follows from g=1/(c+v), and where χ≠0 from the same displayed inequality and g=1/(c+v−χ/f). Therefore g is holomorphic on an open neighborhood of D‾, vanishes at p, and has positive real part on D.

6.1F7F8step 5.1

Set h=e−g on this neighborhood. It is holomorphic, h(p)=1, and ∣h(z)∣=e−Re⁡g(z)<1 for every z∈D. This proves branch 1 under exactly its stated smooth negative-set hypotheses, including critical boundary points and disconnected D.

7.1F3step 6.1given

Under the smooth strongly pseudoconvex boundary hypotheses of branch 2, [F3] constructs a C∞ defining function on a neighborhood of D‾, strictly psh near ∂D. Its proof glues the given smooth local defining functions with a finite partition near the compact boundary, extends with a sign-constant interior/exterior term, and applies eCr−1 after a tangent/normal Levi estimate. Thus it supplies the smooth data required by branch 1 without upgrading a merely C2 function. Step 6.1 now gives the same h for branch 2.

8.1F9step 6.1step 7.1∎

Both branches of the Statement hold with all their original hypotheses, under the ambient AC.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

98 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources